search for: creator_id

...s suggested adding multiple habtm associatings in the Issue object. Here''s how they look: class Issue < ActiveRecord::Base has_and_belongs_to_many :creators has_and_belongs_to_many :writers, :class_name=>''Creator'', :association_foreign_key=>''creator_id'', :conditions=>''creator_job_id=1'' has_and_belongs_to_many :pencillers, :class_name=>''Creator'', :association_foreign_key=>''creator_id'', :conditions=>''creator_job_id=2'' has_and_belongs_to_many :inker...

i am working on a task manager with ruby on rails. it is my first major project, so i''m still gettng my feet wet as i learn. i''ve been trying to use the built in relationships to link my tables together, but i''m not able to use the same naming conventions. for each task, it has a field for the creator, and another field for the assignee. both of these fields

Hi all My visitors can create party organisator profiles, and I want assign them as the creators (the field creator_id in the organisators table references a member in the members table). To do that I tried it with before_validation: def before_validation creator = Member.find 1 end Sadly, this does not work. The validation validates_presence_of :creator_id Still tells me, that creator needs a value....

...in that is automatically update the backlog_items_count on the way through the script, so in my console I tried the following >> pro = Product.find_all => [#<Product:0x409a6c34 @attributes={"name"=>"Product 1", "sprints_count"=>"0", "creator_id"=>"0", "id"=>"1", "backlog_items_count"=>"0", "update_user_id"=>"0", "owner"=>"0", "created"=>"2006-07-13 12:21:12", "updated"=>nil, "due"=>...

...ss Task < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :assignee, :class_name => ''User'', :foreign_key => ''assignee_id'' belongs_to :creator, :class_name => ''User'', :foreign_key => ''creator_id'' has_many :comments, :dependent => destroy validates_presence_of :title, :description, :date_due acts_as_list :scope => :assignee end and this is what i have in my User model: class User < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :assigned, :class_name => ''T...

I''m pleased to announce a new plugin for Rails: Userstamp. You can read my blog post at http://www.delynnberry.com/articles/2006/01/20/userstamp-plugin and/or read all about it at the perminant page http://www.delynnberry.com/pages/userstamp. Any comments or suggestions for improvement are much appreciated. -- DeLynn Berry delynn@gmail.com http://www.delynnberry.com A dump of the Readme

...) AMD-Vi: Found MSI capability block at 0x54 (XEN) AMD-Vi: ACPI Table: (XEN) AMD-Vi: Signature IVRS (XEN) AMD-Vi: Length 0xd0 (XEN) AMD-Vi: Revision 0x1 (XEN) AMD-Vi: CheckSum 0x9b (XEN) AMD-Vi: OEM_Id AMD (XEN) AMD-Vi: OEM_Table_Id RD890S (XEN) AMD-Vi: OEM_Revision 0x202031 (XEN) AMD-Vi: Creator_Id AMD (XEN) AMD-Vi: Creator_Revision 0x0 (XEN) AMD-Vi: IVRS Block: type 0x10 flags 0x3e len 0xa0 id 0x2 (XEN) AMD-Vi: IVHD Device Entry: type 0x3 id 0x0 flags 0x0 (XEN) AMD-Vi: Dev_Id Range: 0x0 -> 0x2 (XEN) AMD-Vi: IVHD Device Entry: type 0x2 id 0x10 flags 0x0 (XEN) AMD-Vi: IVHD Device Entry:...

...ssign rights etc.) guests the same way as any other user + All dynamic finder stuff etc. in Rails can be fully used, e.g. one can create statistics for the guest user + Foreign keys can be set e.g. for comments that can be written by guests AND members (no need to allow NULL in database fields like creator_id) Alternative 3: - One can''t read statistics for the guest user out of the database as one can in Alternative 2 - Foreign keys can''t be set as it is possible in Alternative 2 + The view code does not have to know anything about the difference between guests and logged in members +...

Hi! From other people posting to this list, I know that there has been a bug related to the issue described in Xen Security Advisory 36 that disables iommu for some AMD users like me. However, even when passing "iommu=no-amd-iommu-perdev-intremap" it still disables i/o virtualisatoin. Related Xen dmesg output: (XEN) IVHD Error: Invalid IO-APIC 0 (XEN) AMD-Vi: Error initialization

...__u32 signature_end; /* must be CPER_SIG_END */ + __u16 section_count; + __u32 error_severity; + __u32 validation_bits; + __u32 record_length; + __u64 timestamp; + uuid_le platform_id; + uuid_le partition_id; + uuid_le creator_id; + uuid_le notification_type; + __u64 record_id; + __u32 flags; + __u64 persistence_information; + __u8 reserved[12]; /* must be zero */ +}; + +struct cper_section_descriptor { + __u32 section_offset; /* Offset in bytes of the...

...) AMD-Vi: Found MSI capability block at 0x54 (XEN) AMD-Vi: ACPI Table: (XEN) AMD-Vi: Signature IVRS (XEN) AMD-Vi: Length 0xc0 (XEN) AMD-Vi: Revision 0x1 (XEN) AMD-Vi: CheckSum 0x23 (XEN) AMD-Vi: OEM_Id AMD (XEN) AMD-Vi: OEM_Table_Id RD890S (XEN) AMD-Vi: OEM_Revision 0x202031 (XEN) AMD-Vi: Creator_Id AMD (XEN) AMD-Vi: Creator_Revision 0 (XEN) AMD-Vi: IVRS Block: type 0x10 flags 0x3e len 0x90 id 0x2 (XEN) AMD-Vi: IVHD Device Entry: type 0x3 id 0 flags 0 (XEN) AMD-Vi: Dev_Id Range: 0 -> 0x2 (XEN) AMD-Vi: IVHD Device Entry: type 0x2 id 0x10 flags 0 (XEN) AMD-Vi: IVHD Device Entry: type 0x2 i...

...) AMD-Vi: Found MSI capability block at 0x54 (XEN) AMD-Vi: ACPI Table: (XEN) AMD-Vi: Signature IVRS (XEN) AMD-Vi: Length 0xd0 (XEN) AMD-Vi: Revision 0x1 (XEN) AMD-Vi: CheckSum 0x40 (XEN) AMD-Vi: OEM_Id AMD (XEN) AMD-Vi: OEM_Table_Id RD890S (XEN) AMD-Vi: OEM_Revision 0x202031 (XEN) AMD-Vi: Creator_Id AMD (XEN) AMD-Vi: Creator_Revision 0 (XEN) AMD-Vi: IVRS Block: type 0x10 flags 0x3e len 0xa0 id 0x2 (XEN) AMD-Vi: IVHD Device Entry: type 0x3 id 0 flags 0 (XEN) AMD-Vi: Dev_Id Range: 0 -> 0x2 (XEN) AMD-Vi: IVHD Device Entry: type 0x2 id 0x10 flags 0 (XEN) AMD-Vi: IVHD Device Entry: type 0x3 i...

Hi Konrad, Today i tried linuses tree of today (last commit is 4c4d285ad5665bfbd983b95fde8d7a477d24a361). It boots dom0 fine, but it fails to start any domU with: "Error: Failed to query current memory allocation of dom0." With my previous 3.1.5 kernel everything is fine, nothing else changed in config in between. dmesg and xm dmesg attached -- Sander Dom0 shows: total