Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "createunspecifiedparamet".
Did you mean:
createunspecifiedparameter
2014 Jun 24
2
[LLVMdev] Issues with clang-llvm debug info validity
...+ EltTys.push_back(getOrCreateType(Ty->getReturnType(), Unit).getRef());
// Set up remainder of arguments if there is a prototype.
// otherwise emit it as a variadic function.
@@ -779,7 +779,7 @@ llvm::DIType CGDebugInfo::CreateType(const FunctionType *Ty,
EltTys.push_back(DBuilder.createUnspecifiedParameter());
else if (const FunctionProtoType *FPT = dyn_cast<FunctionProtoType>(Ty)) {
for (unsigned i = 0, e = FPT->getNumParams(); i != e; ++i)
- EltTys.push_back(getOrCreateType(FPT->getParamType(i), Unit));
+ EltTys.push_back(getOrCreateType(FPT->getParamType(i), Unit...
2014 Jun 24
2
[LLVMdev] Issues with clang-llvm debug info validity
+Adrian & Manman,
Looks like this is a case of non-DIRef references ending up in the IR,
and thus the references not being deduplicated. This could lead to
some of the IR bloat that you guys implemented the DIRef stuff to
reduce/avoid.
The specific issue is that the type is slightly different in the two
TUs (since the namespace scope it's contained within is different in
the two TUs -