search for: createmcasmparser

Resending, any pointers are much appreciated. On 5/7/2012 11:16 PM, Ashok Nalkund wrote: > > > On 5/7/2012 10:17 PM, Bendersky, Eli wrote: > <snip> >>>> $lli -entry-function="ISimEngine_GetVersion" -use-mcjit libengine.bc >>>> LLVM ERROR: Inline asm not supported by this streamer because we don't >>>> have an asm parser for this

On 5/7/2012 10:17 PM, Bendersky, Eli wrote: <snip> >>> $lli -entry-function="ISimEngine_GetVersion" -use-mcjit libengine.bc >>> LLVM ERROR: Inline asm not supported by this streamer because we don't >>> have an asm parser for this target >> >> I also tried other variations of the call with the same result: >>> $lli

...4 objects. This information comes from MipsAsmBackend and ultimately comes from Triple::mips/mipsel vs Triple::mips64/mips64el. This is incorrect for N32 (which should be ELF32 but has Triple::mips64/mips64el) and for mips-linux-gnu –mips64 (which should be ELF32 since it should target O32). * Call createMCAsmParser() * Call a different createMCAsmParser(). Other places that get ABI information wrong: * AddressSanitizer: Uses Triple::mips64/mips64el to mean the N64 ABI. N32 is a Triple::mips64/mips64el that should behave as the Triple::mips/mipsel cases do. * DataFlowSanitizer: Is heading down the same road b...

...4 objects. This information comes from MipsAsmBackend and ultimately comes from Triple::mips/mipsel vs Triple::mips64/mips64el. This is incorrect for N32 (which should be ELF32 but has Triple::mips64/mips64el) and for mips-linux-gnu –mips64 (which should be ELF32 since it should target O32). * Call createMCAsmParser() * Call a different createMCAsmParser(). Other places that get ABI information wrong: * AddressSanitizer: Uses Triple::mips64/mips64el to mean the N64 ABI. N32 is a Triple::mips64/mips64el that should behave as the Triple::mips/mipsel cases do. * DataFlowSanitizer: Is heading down the same road...

...4 objects. This information comes from MipsAsmBackend and ultimately comes from Triple::mips/mipsel vs Triple::mips64/mips64el. This is incorrect for N32 (which should be ELF32 but has Triple::mips64/mips64el) and for mips-linux-gnu –mips64 (which should be ELF32 since it should target O32). * Call createMCAsmParser() * Call a different createMCAsmParser(). Other places that get ABI information wrong: * AddressSanitizer: Uses Triple::mips64/mips64el to mean the N64 ABI. N32 is a Triple::mips64/mips64el that should behave as the Triple::mips/mipsel cases do. * DataFlowSanitizer: Is heading down the same road...

...4 objects. This information comes from MipsAsmBackend and ultimately comes from Triple::mips/mipsel vs Triple::mips64/mips64el. This is incorrect for N32 (which should be ELF32 but has Triple::mips64/mips64el) and for mips-linux-gnu –mips64 (which should be ELF32 since it should target O32). * Call createMCAsmParser() * Call a different createMCAsmParser(). Other places that get ABI information wrong: * AddressSanitizer: Uses Triple::mips64/mips64el to mean the N64 ABI. N32 is a Triple::mips64/mips64el that should behave as the Triple::mips/mipsel cases do. * DataFlowSanitizer: Is heading down the same road...

...formation comes from MipsAsmBackend and ultimately comes from Triple::mips/mipsel vs Triple::mips64/mips64el. This is incorrect for N32 (which should be ELF32 but has Triple::mips64/mips64el) and for mips-linux-gnu –mips64 (which should be ELF32 since it should target O32). · If assembling createMCAsmParser · If disassembling: o createMCRegInfo() (again) o createMCAsmInfo() (again) § This has the same issues as the first call. o createMCDisassembler() Clang does pretty much the same thing as this but additionally has to deal with using the correct default ABI for the given triple....

...formation comes from MipsAsmBackend and ultimately comes from Triple::mips/mipsel vs Triple::mips64/mips64el. This is incorrect for N32 (which should be ELF32 but has Triple::mips64/mips64el) and for mips-linux-gnu –mips64 (which should be ELF32 since it should target O32). • If assembling createMCAsmParser • If disassembling: o createMCRegInfo() (again) o createMCAsmInfo() (again) • This has the same issues as the first call. o createMCDisassembler() Clang does pretty much the same thing as this but additionally has to deal with using the correct default ABI for the given triple....

>> Here's the line of thought that I'd like people to start with: >> * Triples don't describe the target. They look like they should, but they >> don't. They're really just arbitrary strings. > >Triples are used as a starting point, but no more. I disagree with this but for now let's assume it's true. The starting point is incorrect because