Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "createinvok".
Did you mean:
createinvoke
2008 Apr 23
2
[LLVMdev] templates vs code to generate IR
...ta structure:
InstructionHandle start =
il.append(factory.createFieldAccess("java.lang.System", "out",
p_stream,
Constants.GETSTATIC));
il.append(new PUSH(cp, "Hello"));
il.append(factory.createInvoke("java.io.PrintStream", "print",
Type.VOID,
new Type[] { Type.STRING },
Constants.INVOKEVIRTUAL));
Templates differ from code snippets in that templates specify exactly
what the outp...
2012 Apr 05
0
[LLVMdev] Catching C++ exceptions, cleaning up, rethrowing
...t; ctor_args.insert( ctor_args.begin(), void_obj_ptr );
>
> // Call object's constructor.
> BasicBlock *const normal_blk = BasicBlock::Create( ctx, "normal", fn );
> BasicBlock *const unwind_blk = BasicBlock::Create( ctx, "unwind", fn );
> builder.CreateInvoke( ctor, normal_blk, unwind_blk, ctor_args );
>
> // Call object's destructor.
> BasicBlock *const dtor_blk = BasicBlock::Create( ctx, "dtor", fn );
> builder.SetInsertPoint( dtor_blk );
> builder.CreateCall( dtor, void_obj_ptr );
> builder.CreateBr( unwi...
2008 Apr 24
0
[LLVMdev] templates vs code to generate IR
...tionHandle start =
> il.append(factory.createFieldAccess("java.lang.System", "out",
> p_stream,
> Constants.GETSTATIC));
> il.append(new PUSH(cp, "Hello"));
> il.append(factory.createInvoke("java.io.PrintStream", "print",
> Type.VOID,
> new Type[] { Type.STRING },
> Constants.INVOKEVIRTUAL));
>
> Templates differ from code snippets in that templates specify...
2012 Mar 23
2
[LLVMdev] Catching C++ exceptions, cleaning up, rethrowing
On Mar 23, 2012, at 4:29 PM, Paul J. Lucas wrote:
> On Mar 23, 2012, at 3:25 PM, Bill Wendling wrote:
>
>> Let's take your example. You will have code that looks like this:
>>
>> extern "C" void thunk_item_M_delete( void *v_that ) {
>> item *that = 0;
>> try {
>> that = static_cast<item*>( v_that );
>>
2016 Oct 28
4
What was the IR made for precisely?
> On Oct 28, 2016, at 1:21 AM, David Chisnall <David.Chisnall at cl.cam.ac.uk> wrote:
>
> On 28 Oct 2016, at 02:43, ジョウェットジェームス <b3i4zz1gu1 at docomo.ne.jp> wrote:
>>
>> I would need to sum up all the rules and ABIs and sizes for all the targets I need and generate different IR for each, am I correct?
>
> This is a long-known limitation of LLVM IR and