search for: createfunct

...when passing this node !{i32 786454, metadata <badref>, metadata <badref>, metadata !"fn_t", i32 5, i64 0, i64 0, i64 0, i32 0, metadata <badref>} ; [ DW_TAG_typedef ] [fn_t] [line 5, size 0, align 0, offset 0] [from ] as the function type parameter to DIBuilder::createFunction, due to this check in DebugInfo.cpp: 486 DICompositeType Ty = getType(); 487 if (!Ty.Verify()) 488 return false; Is it in fact wrong to pass a typedef here? Thanks, Duncan.

...gt; > !{i32 786454, metadata <badref>, metadata <badref>, metadata !"fn_t", i32 > 5, i64 0, i64 0, i64 0, i32 0, metadata <badref>} ; [ DW_TAG_typedef ] > [fn_t] [line 5, size 0, align 0, offset 0] [from ] > > as the function type parameter to DIBuilder::createFunction, due to this > check > in DebugInfo.cpp: > > 486 DICompositeType Ty = getType(); > 487 if (!Ty.Verify()) > 488 return false; > > Is it in fact wrong to pass a typedef here? > I can't come up with a way that'd be correct, no. You should be u...

...786454, metadata <badref>, metadata <badref>, metadata !"fn_t", i32 >> 5, i64 0, i64 0, i64 0, i32 0, metadata <badref>} ; [ DW_TAG_typedef ] >> [fn_t] [line 5, size 0, align 0, offset 0] [from ] >> >> as the function type parameter to DIBuilder::createFunction, due to this >> check >> in DebugInfo.cpp: >> >> 486 DICompositeType Ty = getType(); >> 487 if (!Ty.Verify()) >> 488 return false; >> >> Is it in fact wrong to pass a typedef here? >> > > I can't come up with a w...

...gt;, metadata <badref>, metadata !"fn_t", >>> i32 >>> 5, i64 0, i64 0, i64 0, i32 0, metadata <badref>} ; [ DW_TAG_typedef ] >>> [fn_t] [line 5, size 0, align 0, offset 0] [from ] >>> >>> as the function type parameter to DIBuilder::createFunction, due to this >>> check >>> in DebugInfo.cpp: >>> >>> 486 DICompositeType Ty = getType(); >>> 487 if (!Ty.Verify()) >>> 488 return false; >>> >>> Is it in fact wrong to pass a typedef here? >>> &g...

Hi Eric, >> But then we still don't emit anything about the function (& neither does GCC). >> So make it a member function (so we are forced to emit the declaration >> even without complicating the example by having to add a definition >> (which by necessity cannot use the typedef))... and then we see that >> the subprogram description doesn't refer to a

..."fn_t", >>>>> i32 >>>>> 5, i64 0, i64 0, i64 0, i32 0, metadata <badref>} ; [ DW_TAG_typedef ] >>>>> [fn_t] [line 5, size 0, align 0, offset 0] [from ] >>>>> >>>>> as the function type parameter to DIBuilder::createFunction, due to this >>>>> check >>>>> in DebugInfo.cpp: >>>>> >>>>> 486 DICompositeType Ty = getType(); >>>>> 487 if (!Ty.Verify()) >>>>> 488 return false; >>>>> >>>>...

...dref>, metadata !"fn_t", >>>> i32 >>>> 5, i64 0, i64 0, i64 0, i32 0, metadata <badref>} ; [ DW_TAG_typedef ] >>>> [fn_t] [line 5, size 0, align 0, offset 0] [from ] >>>> >>>> as the function type parameter to DIBuilder::createFunction, due to this >>>> check >>>> in DebugInfo.cpp: >>>> >>>> 486 DICompositeType Ty = getType(); >>>> 487 if (!Ty.Verify()) >>>> 488 return false; >>>> >>>> Is it in fact wrong to pass...

...t;>>>>> i32 >>>>>> 5, i64 0, i64 0, i64 0, i32 0, metadata <badref>} ; [ DW_TAG_typedef ] >>>>>> [fn_t] [line 5, size 0, align 0, offset 0] [from ] >>>>>> >>>>>> as the function type parameter to DIBuilder::createFunction, due to this >>>>>> check >>>>>> in DebugInfo.cpp: >>>>>> >>>>>> 486 DICompositeType Ty = getType(); >>>>>> 487 if (!Ty.Verify()) >>>>>> 488 return false; >>>&...

...false /*isOptimized*/, StringRef("") /*Flags*/, 0 /*RV: Runtime Version?*/); DIFile file = dibuilder->createFile(StringRef("foo.x"), StringRef(".")); DICompileUnit compile_unit = DICompileUnit(file); dibuilder->createFunction(compile_unit /*Scope*/, StringRef(function_name), StringRef(function_name), file, 42 /* line number*/, di_func_type, false /*isLocalToUnit*/, true /*isDefinition*/, 42 /*ScopeLine*/...

...into verifier). I can run llc manually on my IR without complaint. However, I am not able to ascertain whether llc runs the debug info verifier by default. One of the changes I had to make to get my code to compile was to remove the function argument (of Function* type) from the call to DIBuilder::createFunction(). This appears to be my problem, as my functions do not appear to have debug info: >From my 3.7.1 code: define void @func(%artype*) #4 !dbg !5 { !5 = distinct !DISubprogram(n...) >From 3.9.0: define void @func(%artype*) #4 { What must I do to attach the DISubprogram metadata node to...

...seindia.com/, http://marathi.bseindia.com/, http://gujarati.bseindia.com/, Select Language, Hindi, Marathi, Gujarati txtscrip: [ Scrip Name / Code ] ................................................................................................................................................. g = createFunction(ff[[1]]) here after how to call the function like this and getting the table out of it. xx = g("10/09/2012 ", "15/10/2012") expecting your reply. thanks veepsirtt On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 12:10 PM, <veepsirtt@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Duncan > > How to pass the...

...st&, llvm::Instruction*)", referenced from: llvm::IRBuilder<true, llvm::ConstantFolder, llvm::IRBuilderDefaultInserter<true> >::CreateFCmp(llvm::CmpInst::Predicate, llvm::Value*, llvm::Value*, llvm::Twine const&, llvm::MDNode*) in toy-1f302b.o "llvm::DIBuilder::createFunction(llvm::DIScope*, llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef, llvm::DIFile*, unsigned int, llvm::DISubroutineType*, bool, bool, unsigned int, unsigned int, bool, llvm::MDTupleTypedArrayWrapper<llvm::DITemplateParameter>, llvm::DISubprogram*)", referenced from: (anonymous namespace)::Functio...

Hi - attached is a patch to enable building DragonEgg (x86_64) for LLVM3.3 and LLVM3.4. That is, add these changes to the 3.3 release, and it becomes possible to build DragonEgg against a llvm3.4 compiler. Regards, Richard Gorton Cognitive Electronics rcgorton at cog-e.com ---------- -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name:

...ier). I can run llc manually on my IR without complaint. However, I am not able to ascertain whether llc runs the debug info verifier by default. > > One of the changes I had to make to get my code to compile was to remove the function argument (of Function* type) from the call to DIBuilder::createFunction(). This appears to be my problem, as my functions do not appear to have debug info: > > From my 3.7.1 code: > > define void @func(%artype*) #4 !dbg !5 { > !5 = distinct !DISubprogram(n...) > > From 3.9.0: > > define void @func(%artype*) #4 { > > What must I...

...clude "llvm/Module.h" #include "llvm/Intrinsics.h" #include "llvm/Instructions.h" #include "llvm/ModuleProvider.h" #include "llvm/ExecutionEngine/JIT.h" #include "llvm/Support/LLVMBuilder.h" using namespace llvm; static Function *createFunction(Module *module) { VectorType *float4Type = VectorType::get(Type::FloatTy, 4); PointerType *float4PointerType = PointerType::get(float4Type, 0); std::vector<const Type*> functionArguments; functionArguments.push_back(float4PointerType); functionArgumen...

...actual function at all. To build corresponding debug info, I must: 6. Build a llvm::DIArray, using llvm::getOrCreateArray, from the results of 4. 7. Build a llvm::DIComposite type for the function, using llvm::createSubroutineType, from the result of 6. 8. Build a llvm::DIFunction using llvm::createFunction, from the result of 7. Here, I need the formal values, with names, first, before building the function type. This appears to imply that, in debug info, the formal names are also part of the function type, which thus cannot be reused for a different function with different formal names. Can I...

If I have a set of basic blocks and edges and I need to create for them a new function with new entry and end points. Could I create this directly in LLVM , just like createFunction(F) then F.insert(bb, edges) which bb is a basic block and edges is the new edges for the new function. Thanks -- *Rasha Salah Omar Msc Student at E-JUST Demonestrator at Faculty of Computers and Informatics Benha University * -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was sc...

...get forwarded to a new page. Which selections are being made in the forms does not really matter, I get quite far, pls see the code: library(RCurl) library(RHTMLForms) library(XML) pageForms = getHTMLFormDescription("http://toast.gasunie.de/gud/search.aspx?soid=GUD&lang=de") fun = createFunction(pageForms[[1]]) retSubmit = fun('ctl00$MainContent$GasQuality' = "H", 'ctl00$MainContent$PointList' = "H071", 'ctl00$MainContent$PointType' = "EN", 'ctl00$MainContent$Publishers' = "HourValues", 'ctl00$MainContent$ListH...

...eindia.com/, http://marathi.bseindia.com/, http://gujarati.bseindia.com/, Select Language, Hindi, Marathi, Gujarati txtscrip: [ Scrip Name / Code ] ................................................................................................................................................. g = createFunction(ff[[1]]) here after how to call the function like this and getting the table out of it. xx = g("10/09/2012 ", "15/10/2012") expecting your reply. thanks veepsirtt -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Passing-the-parameters-for-web-form-using-...

Hi, I am starting coding in r and one of the things that i want to do is to scrape some data from the web. The problem that I am having is that I cannot get passed the disclaimer page (which produces a session cookie). I have been able to collect some ideas and combine them in the code below but I dont get passed the disclaimer page. I am trying to agree the disclaimer with the postForm and write