Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "createclasstype".
2019 Feb 05
2
[DebugInfo][DIBuilder] Good way to pass arguments to createClassType/createMemberType
Hi,
I'm trying to use DIBuilder to build my debug info and export it into a
PDB, but I don't understand the way some DIBuilder method work.
My question might have a straightforward answer but I don't see it ... (and
I can't find any example code using these methods anywhere).
Indeed createClassType takes an "Elements" argument, and createMemberType
takes a "Scope" argument. Like the "who's first, egg or hen", I don't know
If I need to create my members first using le compilation unit as the
scope, put them in an array and give them to createClassType Elem...
2019 Feb 06
2
[DebugInfo][DIBuilder] Good way to pass arguments to createClassType/createMemberType
...m trying to use DIBuilder to build my debug info and export it into a PDB, but I don't understand the way some DIBuilder method work.
> My question might have a straightforward answer but I don't see it ... (and I can't find any example code using these methods anywhere).
> Indeed createClassType takes an "Elements" argument, and createMemberType takes a "Scope" argument. Like the "who's first, egg or hen", I don't know If I need to create my members first using le compilation unit as the scope, put them in an array and give them to createClassType Elem...
2012 Jun 28
0
[LLVMdev] llvm dwarf emission
On 28/06/12 11:29, Renato Golin wrote:
> On 28 June 2012 10:15, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote:
>>> I wanted to check that I'm headed in the right direction before I work more on
>>> LLVM debug info. What I'd like to do is update DIBuilder to expose exactly the
>>> facilities represented in modern DWARF,
>>
>> wouldn't it be
2012 Jun 28
2
[LLVMdev] llvm dwarf emission
On 28 June 2012 10:15, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote:
>> I wanted to check that I'm headed in the right direction before I work more on
>> LLVM debug info. What I'd like to do is update DIBuilder to expose exactly the
>> facilities represented in modern DWARF,
>
> wouldn't it be better in the long term to make the debug info layer more
>