search for: crc_args

Displaying 12 results from an estimated 12 matches for "crc_args".

2020 Jun 22
0
[RFC v5 10/10] drm/nouveau/kms/nvd9-: Add CRC support
...int or, + enum nv50_crc_source_type source, + struct nv50_crc_notifier_ctx *ctx, u32 wndw) +{ + struct drm_crtc *crtc = &head->base.base; + struct nv50_dmac *core = &nv50_disp(head->base.base.dev)->core->chan; + const u32 hoff = head->base.index * 0x300; + u32 *push; + u32 crc_args = 0xfff00000; + + switch (source) { + case NV50_CRC_SOURCE_TYPE_SOR: + crc_args |= (0x00000f0f + or * 16) << 8; + break; + case NV50_CRC_SOURCE_TYPE_PIOR: + crc_args |= (0x000000ff + or * 256) << 8; + break; + case NV50_CRC_SOURCE_TYPE_DAC: + crc_args |= (0x00000ff0 + or) <<...
2020 Mar 18
0
[PATCH 9/9] drm/nouveau/kms/nvd9-: Add CRC support
...int or, + enum nv50_crc_source_type source, + struct nv50_crc_notifier_ctx *ctx, u32 wndw) +{ + struct drm_crtc *crtc = &head->base.base; + struct nv50_dmac *core = &nv50_disp(head->base.base.dev)->core->chan; + const u32 hoff = head->base.index * 0x300; + u32 *push; + u32 crc_args = 0xfff00000; + + switch (source) { + case NV50_CRC_SOURCE_TYPE_SOR: + crc_args |= (0x00000f0f + or * 16) << 8; + break; + case NV50_CRC_SOURCE_TYPE_PIOR: + crc_args |= (0x000000ff + or * 256) << 8; + break; + case NV50_CRC_SOURCE_TYPE_DAC: + crc_args |= (0x00000ff0 + or) <<...
2020 Apr 17
0
[RFC v3 11/11] drm/nouveau/kms/nvd9-: Add CRC support
...int or, + enum nv50_crc_source_type source, + struct nv50_crc_notifier_ctx *ctx, u32 wndw) +{ + struct drm_crtc *crtc = &head->base.base; + struct nv50_dmac *core = &nv50_disp(head->base.base.dev)->core->chan; + const u32 hoff = head->base.index * 0x300; + u32 *push; + u32 crc_args = 0xfff00000; + + switch (source) { + case NV50_CRC_SOURCE_TYPE_SOR: + crc_args |= (0x00000f0f + or * 16) << 8; + break; + case NV50_CRC_SOURCE_TYPE_PIOR: + crc_args |= (0x000000ff + or * 256) << 8; + break; + case NV50_CRC_SOURCE_TYPE_DAC: + crc_args |= (0x00000ff0 + or) <<...
2020 May 08
0
[RFC v4 12/12] drm/nouveau/kms/nvd9-: Add CRC support
...int or, + enum nv50_crc_source_type source, + struct nv50_crc_notifier_ctx *ctx, u32 wndw) +{ + struct drm_crtc *crtc = &head->base.base; + struct nv50_dmac *core = &nv50_disp(head->base.base.dev)->core->chan; + const u32 hoff = head->base.index * 0x300; + u32 *push; + u32 crc_args = 0xfff00000; + + switch (source) { + case NV50_CRC_SOURCE_TYPE_SOR: + crc_args |= (0x00000f0f + or * 16) << 8; + break; + case NV50_CRC_SOURCE_TYPE_PIOR: + crc_args |= (0x000000ff + or * 256) << 8; + break; + case NV50_CRC_SOURCE_TYPE_DAC: + crc_args |= (0x00000ff0 + or) <<...
2020 Mar 18
12
[PATCH 0/9] drm/nouveau: Introduce CRC support for gf119+
Nvidia released some documentation on how CRC support works on their GPUs, hooray! So: this patch series implements said CRC support in nouveau, along with adding some special debugfs interfaces for some relevant igt-gpu-tools tests that we'll be sending in just a short bit. This additionally adds a feature that Ville Syrj?l? came up with: vblank works. Basically, this is just a generic DRM
2020 Jun 22
13
[RFC v5 00/10] drm/nouveau: Introduce CRC support for gf119+
Nvidia released some documentation on how CRC support works on their GPUs, hooray! So: this patch series implements said CRC support in nouveau, along with adding some special debugfs interfaces for some relevant igt-gpu-tools tests (already on the ML). First - we add some new functionality to kthread_work in the kernel, and then use this to add a new feature to DRM that Ville Syrj?l? came up
2020 Apr 17
9
[RFC v3 00/11] drm/nouveau: Introduce CRC support for gf119+
Nvidia released some documentation on how CRC support works on their GPUs, hooray! So: this patch series implements said CRC support in nouveau, along with adding some special debugfs interfaces for some relevant igt-gpu-tools tests that we'll be sending in just a short bit. This additionally adds a feature that Ville Syrj?l? came up with: vblank works. Basically, this is just a generic DRM
2020 Jun 27
9
[RFC v8 0/9] drm/nouveau: Introduce CRC support for gf119+
Nvidia released some documentation on how CRC support works on their GPUs, hooray! So: this patch series implements said CRC support in nouveau, along with adding some special debugfs interfaces for some relevant igt-gpu-tools tests (already on the ML). First - we add some new functionality to kthread_work in the kernel, and then use this to add a new feature to DRM that Ville Syrj?l? came up
2020 May 08
16
[RFC v4 00/12] drm/nouveau: Introduce CRC support for gf119+
Nvidia released some documentation on how CRC support works on their GPUs, hooray! So: this patch series implements said CRC support in nouveau, along with adding some special debugfs interfaces for some relevant igt-gpu-tools tests (already on the ML). First - we add some new functionality to kthread_work in the kernel, and then use this to add a new feature to DRM that Ville Syrj?l? came up
2020 Jun 24
13
[RFC v7 00/11] drm/nouveau: Introduce CRC support for gf119+
Nvidia released some documentation on how CRC support works on their GPUs, hooray! So: this patch series implements said CRC support in nouveau, along with adding some special debugfs interfaces for some relevant igt-gpu-tools tests (already on the ML). First - we add some new functionality to kthread_work in the kernel, and then use this to add a new feature to DRM that Ville Syrj?l? came up
2023 Jul 12
8
[PATCH RFC v1 00/52] drm/crtc: Rename struct drm_crtc::dev to drm_dev
Hello, while I debugged an issue in the imx-lcdc driver I was constantly irritated about struct drm_device pointer variables being named "dev" because with that name I usually expect a struct device pointer. I think there is a big benefit when these are all renamed to "drm_dev". I have no strong preference here though, so "drmdev" or "drm" are fine for me,
2023 Jul 12
8
[PATCH RFC v1 00/52] drm/crtc: Rename struct drm_crtc::dev to drm_dev
Hello, while I debugged an issue in the imx-lcdc driver I was constantly irritated about struct drm_device pointer variables being named "dev" because with that name I usually expect a struct device pointer. I think there is a big benefit when these are all renamed to "drm_dev". I have no strong preference here though, so "drmdev" or "drm" are fine for me,