search for: craigs

Hi all, I''ve upgraded my system to Rails 1.1.1 successfully. After much looking I haven''t found out how to migrate an existing application to a new rails version though. What is the procedure, if any, for upgrading the application I''ve developed in 1.0? Is there a script I need to run? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Hi Craig, thanks for digging into this. So InstCombine is the wrong place for fixing PR34474. Can you give me a hint where such an optimization should go into CodeGen? I am not really familiar with stuff that happens after the MidLevel. Cheers, Michael Am 13.09.2017 um 19:21 schrieb Craig Topper: > And that is less instructions. So from InstCombine's perspective the > multiply is

This conversation has (partially) moved on to D37896 now, but if possible I was hoping that we could perform this in DAGCombiner and remove the various target specific combines that we still have. At least ARM/AARCH64 and X86 have cases that can hopefully be generalised and removed, but there will probably be a few legality/perf issues that will occur. Simon. > On 14 Sep 2017, at 06:23,

I am ''raking'' my brain to fix this problem - I have searched, googled, looked through rake documentation, wiki.rubyonrails and I can''t fix... This works $ rake plugindoc (in /home/craig/ruby-db/th-db) rdoc -o doc/plugins/ez_where --title ''Ez Where Plugin Documentation'' -- line-numbers --inline-source -T html

Hi Sanjay, thanks for enlighten me on terms of tests. I assume I have to run the test-suite benchmarks to check for regressions? Is there a guide to get the metrics from the benchmarks? Cheers, Michael BTW the beginner tag for bugs was really a good idea to get started with contributing to llvm. On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 3:58 PM +0200, "Sanjay Patel" <spatel at

I am currently improving the D37896 to include the suggestions from Chad. However, running the lit checks for the x86 backend I observe some changes in the generated MC, e.g.: llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/lea-3.ll:13:10: error: expected string not found in input ; CHECK: leal ([[A0]],[[A0]],2), %eax ^ <stdin>:10:2: note: scanning from here orq %rdi, %rax ^ <stdin>:10:2:

On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 3:47 PM, Craig Topper <craig.topper at gmail.com> wrote: > virtual bar *foo() = 0; > > where foo() also exists as pure in the base class. Clang-modernize has a > FIXME that says it can't find the "=0" to do the insert of override. > Does that mean we have a pure virtual function with implementation in Clang/LLVM? If so, I feel it's a

I was getting same error when i keep both EVEX/EVEX_4V and TA. So, i restored my original instructions and for that i have to include bool HasTA = TSFlags & X86II::TA; in x86MCCodeEmitter.cpp then used this condition; if(HasTA) ++SrcRegNum; in order to emit binary correctly. Is it right? On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 5:45 AM, Craig Topper <craig.topper at gmail.com> wrote: >

I''ve seen that Rails 1.1 is not reliable with Ruby 1.8.2 so you should upgrade to 1.8.4 I''m running ruby 1.8.3. What''s the story with it? Do I need to upgrade before I try Rails 1.1? Thanks Greg -- Greg Freemyer The Norcross Group Forensics for the 21st Century

Thank You, I changed TA to EVEX or EVEX_4V. But now i am getting following error: Invalid prefix! UNREACHABLE executed at /lib/Target/X86/MCTargetDesc/X86MCCodeEmitter.cpp:647! On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 4:36 AM, Craig Topper <craig.topper at gmail.com> wrote: > Not all instructions can use EVEX_4V. Move instructions in particular > cannot because they don't have 2 sources. >

System: I am running RedHat 8.0 (2.4.18-14smp) with SAMBA 2.7 and user authentication against OpenLDAP 2.1.22. Problem: On RedHat, Put over (I think 70 or so) users within a secondary group. Got to Konqueror or Nautilus and try to change a directory's permissions to that group with over 70 or so users in it, (it may be 80 or 90 users), YOU CAN NOT assign that group to have ownership of that

+Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> +tstellar at redhat.com <tstellar at redhat.com> for release thoughts.... On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 6:03 PM Craig Topper <craig.topper at gmail.com> wrote: > As far as I could tell, the only non-Intel contributions were from > mechanical API updates or fixing include paths when files moved to other > libraries for layering. > >

I am playing around with this and reference this wiki from RonR site... http://wiki.rubyonrails.org/rails/pages/CalendarHelper The error I am getting is: NameError in Placements#list undefined local variable or method `date_format'' for #<PlacementsController:0xb78f9ef4> RAILS_ROOT: script/../config/.. Application Trace | Framework Trace | Full Trace

Thank You. I used EVEX_4V with all the instructions. I replaced TA and EVEX both with EVEX_4V. Now, I am getting following error: llvm-tblgen: /utils/TableGen/X86RecognizableInstr.cpp:687: void llvm::X86Disassembler::RecognizableInstr::emitInstructionSpecifier(): Assertion `numPhysicalOperands >= 2 + additionalOperands && numPhysicalOperands <= 4 + additionalOperands &&

Yep. Makes sense to me. There's nothing to simplify or constant-fold about an alloca. -Hal On 04/12/2017 04:23 PM, Craig Topper wrote: > Ping > > ~Craig > > On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 1:25 PM, Craig Topper <craig.topper at gmail.com > <mailto:craig.topper at gmail.com>> wrote: > > I notice that GetUnderlyingObject has a few checks, but alloca >

Just adding a bit more info: Running wbinfo -t on the file server results in a successful trust secret check via RPC Running wbinfo -u on the file server returns all my AD users Running wbinfo -g on the file server returns all my AD groups Running wbinfo -p on the file server results in a successful ping to winbindd I have used the basic smb.conf on the wiki page for the file/member

Hi, I''m just learning Ruby on Rails and ran into something where I know I''m either doing something very stupid or I''m missing something. My model as a boolean attribute called active_flag. In my Sql Server database this is stored as a bit value. I then setup a method in my controller called "deactivate". This is very simple, it does: def deactivate

On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 2:21 PM, Craig Topper <craig.topper at gmail.com> wrote: > It also doesn't do pure methods either. I think I don't quite understand what that means. Can you give me an example? > On Thursday, March 6, 2014, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote: > >> After running the tool aginst LLD, I realized that clang-modernize do not >> add

FWIW, I support this especially as it doesn't build. If someone wants to revive it, removing it won't actually make that much harder (if at all) given that they'd need to clean up the build as well. Are there any other (non-Intel) devs who contributed significantly or might have specific opinions about this? Does it make more sense to this before or after the branch? On Mon, Jan

I don't ever do this... Shouldn't this be enough to set up a virtual server in apache? I did create an entry in /etc/hosts and in dns for this fqdn it still gives me the contents of /var/www/html and not /home/craig/ruby-db/th-db/public <VirtualHost *> DocumentRoot "/home/craig/ruby-db/th-db/public" ServerName app-server.tobyhouse.com <Directory