search for: cpu64_to_l

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "cpu64_to_l".

Did you mean: cpu64_to_le
2018 Mar 27
2
murmurhash3 test failures on big-endian systems
...le32_to_cpu, although it should be the same in the end. > } > > //----------------------------------------------------------------------------- > @@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ > > static inline uint64_t getblock64(const uint64_t *p, int i) > { > - return p[i]; > + return cpu64_to_le(p[i]); > } > > Regards, > Apollon
2018 Mar 27
2
murmurhash3 test failures on big-endian systems
Hi, On 12:55 Mon 26 Mar , Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote: > On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 15:57:01 +0300, Apollon Oikonomopoulos wrote: > ... > > I'd be happy to test the patch, thanks! > > Ok, try the attached patch. (It is a first pass at the issue, so it may not > be the final diff that'll end up getting committed. It'd be good to know if > it actually
2018 Mar 27
0
murmurhash3 test failures on big-endian systems
...ic inline uint32_t getblock32(const uint32_t *p, int i) { - return p[i]; + return cpu32_to_le(p[i]); } //----------------------------------------------------------------------------- @@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ static inline uint64_t getblock64(const uint64_t *p, int i) { - return p[i]; + return cpu64_to_le(p[i]); } Regards, Apollon
2018 Mar 27
0
murmurhash3 test failures on big-endian systems
...anks, Jeff. > > } > > > > //----------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > @@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ > > > > static inline uint64_t getblock64(const uint64_t *p, int i) > > { > > - return p[i]; > > + return cpu64_to_le(p[i]); > > } > > > > Regards, > > Apollon -- *NOTE: This message is ROT-13 encrypted twice for extra protection*