Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "cppapi".
Did you mean:
ppapi
2016 May 22
0
Is the CppBackend still supported?
...)
cpp - C++ backend
x86 - 32-bit X86: Pentium-Pro and above
x86-64 - 64-bit X86: EM64T and AMD64
...
* If not delete it, then at least adjust the description? E.g. "LLVM C++
API code" following http://ellcc.org/demo/ ? Could also the name change
to "cppapi"?
* Has there ever been an attempt to implement a real C++ Backend?
Without having done research in that direction - shouldn't that be quite
straightforward? Anyone aware of technical difficulties?
Cheers,
Stefan
--
https://about.me/stefan.graenitz
Am 03.05.16 um 22:23 schrieb James...
2016 May 03
5
Is the CppBackend still supported?
Yes, it's quite obviously dead and should be deleted.
When I brought this up last time -- after realizing that it wasn't actually
a backend that targetted c++ (which might be useful), but rather just
something that emitted IR by calling llvm C++ functions (which really isn't
IMO) -- someone also pointed out that it also really ought to be using
IRBuilder...if anyone cared about it.
2016 May 23
2
Is the CppBackend still supported?
...; x86 - 32-bit X86: Pentium-Pro and above
> x86-64 - 64-bit X86: EM64T and AMD64
> ...
>
> * If not delete it, then at least adjust the description? E.g. "LLVM C++
> API code" following http://ellcc.org/demo/ ? Could also the name change
> to "cppapi"?
>
> * Has there ever been an attempt to implement a real C++ Backend? Without
> having done research in that direction - shouldn't that be quite
> straightforward? Anyone aware of technical difficulties?
>
> Cheers,
> Stefan
>
> -- https://about.me/stefan.graen...