Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "cpms".
Did you mean:
cms
2005 Mar 09
1
second time post please help samba =ads
...ebody clicks on samba server all the
folders which i have explicitly mentioned in the smb.conf are shown
.Whereas what i want is that only those folders should come when the
user access the samba server on which he has the right to access it.
Suppose james is a user having access rights on folders cpms, manager.
Now when he clicks on the samba server he sees his home directory
where he can put his data, a cpms folder which is shared among the
other development team members(have set it with suid) and manager(have
set it this also with suid) and all other folders (specified in
smb.conf) on which he...
2005 Mar 08
0
security = ads or domain
...ebody clicks on samba server all the
folders which i have explicitly mentioned in the smb.conf are shown
.Whereas what i want is that only those folders should come when the
user access the samba server on which he has the right to access it.
Suppose james is a user having access rights on folders cpms, manager.
Now when he clicks on the samba server he sees his home directory
where he can put his data, a cpms folder which is shared among the
other development team members(have set it with suid) and manager(have
set it this also with suid) and all other folders (specified in
smb.conf) on which he...
2009 Aug 27
1
Problems using chan_sebi and Huawei E169G
...huawei1) [OK]
[Aug 27 13:22:27] DEBUG[560]: chan_sebi.c:1011 do_monitor_phone: data_read() (huawei1) [^CVOICE:(0)]
[Aug 27 13:22:27] DEBUG[560]: chan_sebi.c:1011 do_monitor_phone: data_read() (huawei1) [OK]
]Aug 27 13:22:27] DEBUG[560]: chan_sebi.c:853 data_write: data_write() (huawei1) [AT+CMGF=1;+CPMS="ME","ME","ME";+CNMI=1,1,0,1,0
[Aug 27 13:22:27] DEBUG[560]: chan_sebi.c:1011 do_monitor_phone: data_read() (huawei1) [+CPMS: 1,23,1,23,1,23]
[Aug 27 13:22:27] DEBUG[560]: chan_sebi.c:1011 do_monitor_phone: data_read() (huawei1) [OK]
]Aug 27 13:22:27] DEBUG[560]: chan_...
2005 Jun 02
28
One Remaining Issue Regarding 2.4.0
I believe that 2.4.0 is about ready to be sent out the door. I''ve made a
couple of small changes since RC2 but I don''t believe that they warrant
another RC.
There remains the issue of what to do about support for Shorewall 2.0 given
that 2.2 has only been available since March.
It would be my recommendation to make 2.4 the new "stable" release but
continue to