search for: cplus_include_path

Hi, I’m trying to set the includes search path in clang, but I can’t figure out how to do it? I’m working on OSX and every time I compile a C/C++ code, I have to specify it with -isysroot (and I don’t want an alias, or a symlink to /usr/include) since the includes are not in a really standard path on OSX (e.g.:

Solaris 11 include samba 3.6.25. I compiled samba 4.5.1 using GCC 4.8 and gmake. Had set following env variables to make sure krb5.conf was found # CPLUS_INCLUDE_PATH=/usr/include:/usr/include/kerberosv5/ # C_INCLUDE_PATH=/usr/include:/usr/include/kerberosv5/ After setting "client ldap sasl wrapping = plain" I was able to join to a Windows 2008 domain with samba 4. The samba 4.5.1 "wbinfo -m" showed the domain. However "wb...

...7/lib -L/usr/lib" CFLAGS="-I /usr/local/samba-4.4.7/include -I/usr/include" CPPFLAGS="-I /usr/local/samba-4.4.4/include -I/usr/include" export LDFLAGS CFLAGS CPPFLAGS C_INCLUDE_PATH=/usr/local/samba-4.4.7/include:/usr/include:/usr/include/kerberosv5 CPLUS_INCLUDE_PATH=/usr/local/samba-4.4.7/include:/usr/include:/usr/include/kerberosv5 export C_INCLUDE_PATH CPLUS_INCLUDE_PATH Path is set as follows to ensure that gnu version of make and ld are found/ /usr/gcc/4.8/bin:/usr/gnu/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/sbin I only need samba to be a client, not server....

Is there a way to install devtoolset packages without the bloat of eclipse? I just want the new compiler and toolchain, not a big IDE. BTW devtoolset-3 dependencies are broken in yum with C6 yum install devtoolset-3 ... ---> Package devtoolset-3-perftools.x86_64 0:3.1-12.el6 will be installed --> Processing Dependency: devtoolset-3-dyninst for package:

...OPATH=$GCCX_ROOT/share/info:$INFOPATH export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$GCCX_ROOT/lib64:$GCCX_ROOT/lib:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH export LD_RUN_PATH=$GCCX_ROOT/lib64:$GCCX_ROOT/lib:$LD_RUN_PATH export LIBRARY_PATH=$GCCX_ROOT/lib64:$GCCX_ROOT/lib:$LIBRARY_PATH export INCLUDE_PATH=$GCCX_ROOT/include:$INCLUDE_PATH export CPLUS_INCLUDE_PATH=$GCCX_ROOT/include:$CPLUS_INCLUDE_PATH export C_INCLUDE_PATH=$GCCX_ROOT/include:$C_INCLUDE_PATH ############################################################# The above assumes a 64-bit install. If you're running a 32-bit install, change all occurences of "lib64" to "lib"...

Just in case someone is having similar problems and/or following this thread, here's my final "solution" (at least, for now). In my bash build script, prior to configure, I set the C_INCLUDE_PATH and CPLUS_INCLUDE_PATH to empty strings, and then set some other environment variables instead: export C_INCLUDE_PATH= export CPLUS_INCLUDE_PATH= SYSTEM_INCLUDE_PATH="/usr/include/i386-linux-gnu" export CC=gcc export CXX=g++ export CFLAGS="-isystem ""${SYSTEM_INCLUDE_PATH}""" ex...

...uild. I also set create krb5 conf = No to prevent samba recreating /usr/local/samba/var/lock/smb_krb5/krb5.conf each time it restarted, since it would enable DES encryption by default. Maybe I need to compile latest openldap and add to the C_INCLUDE_PATH and CPLUS_INCLUDE_PATH variables. From: Gaiseric Vandal [mailto:gaiseric.vandal at gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2016 9:33 PM To: 'Samba' <samba at lists.samba.org> Subject: Samba 4.51 Solaris 11 AD client Solaris 11 include samba 3.6.25. I compiled samba 4.5.1 using GCC 4.8...

...nd behold, there is a #include <features.h> at line 23, just at the location reported with the error. And why is clang looking in "/usr/include/i386-linux-gnu"? Because I had defined the C_INCLUDE_PATH environment variable with this directory. When I reset this (and LIBRARY_PATH and CPLUS_INCLUDE_PATH) to empty, I can proceed with the make. Here's the problem - I have to have these environment variables defined to allow gcc to work (without them, I can't even get through configure). Ubuntu 11.10, 12.04, and perhaps later versions, put things in "non-standard" locations, and t...

I'm attempting to build a native build of clang from the 3.2 source distribution tarballs, but I ran into this build error that's got me really puzzled. My platform is Linux - 32-bit Ubuntu (12.04) running on a PC. Here's the (abbreviated) output from make: *************************************** ... make[3]: Entering directory

...So I decided to recompile. When recompiling samba 4.4.7 on solaris 11 I saw the following warning Checking for header krb5.h : no The fix for this in Solaris 11 with gcc 4.8.x is export C_INCLUDE_PATH=/usr/include:/usr/include/kerberosv5 export CPLUS_INCLUDE_PATH=/usr/include:/usr/include/kerberosv5 When compling samba 3, if memory serves, I would get a little summary of which features were enabled and which were not. I don't think kerberos is requires for domain trusts? I know that Active Directory does use kerberos but , when trusts are involved...

...flags: -g -O2 -Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wno-uninitialized Preprocessor flags: -I/vapp/include Linker flags: -L/vapp/lib Libraries: -lutil -lz -lnsl -lcrypto -lcrypt # GCC Variables (works with all programs, except OpenSSH. export C_INCLUDE_PATH=/vapp/include:/usr/X11R6/include export CPLUS_INCLUDE_PATH=/vapp/include:/usr/X11R6/include export LIBRARY_PATH=/vapp/lib # So, also included these: export LDFLAGS=-L/vapp/lib export CPPFLAGS=-I/vapp/include # Also tried this option. --without-rpath Disable auto-added -R linker paths # Yet, with every one of these, I get this error with SCP ONLY...

I am not sure if this is relevant root at sambaPDC:~# /usr/local/samba/bin/net rpc trustdom establish DomainB Enter DOMAINA$'s password: Could not connect to server DomainB_DC Trust to domain DomainB established root at sambaPDC:~# root at sambaPDC:~# /usr/local/samba/bin/net rpc trustdom establish DomainC Enter DOMAINA$'s password: Could not connect to

...recompiling samba 4.4.7 on solaris 11 I saw the following warning > > Checking for header krb5.h : no > > > The fix for this in Solaris 11 with gcc 4.8.x is > > export C_INCLUDE_PATH=/usr/include:/usr/include/kerberosv5 > export CPLUS_INCLUDE_PATH=/usr/include:/usr/include/kerberosv5 > > > When compling samba 3, if memory serves, I would get a little summary > of which features were enabled and which were not. > > I don't think kerberos is requires for domain trusts? I know that > Active Directory does use kerbero...