Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "cow_can_writ".
Did you mean:
cow_can_write
2019 Mar 26
0
[PATCH nbdkit v4 05/15] cow: Disable extents information in this filter.
.../cow/cow.c
+++ b/filters/cow/cow.c
@@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ cow_prepare (struct nbdkit_next_ops *next_ops, void *nxdata,
}
/* Whatever the underlying plugin can or can't do, we can write, we
- * cannot trim, and we can flush.
+ * cannot trim or detect extents, and we can flush.
*/
static int
cow_can_write (struct nbdkit_next_ops *next_ops, void *nxdata, void *handle)
@@ -128,6 +128,12 @@ cow_can_trim (struct nbdkit_next_ops *next_ops, void *nxdata, void *handle)
return 0;
}
+static int
+cow_can_extents (struct nbdkit_next_ops *next_ops, void *nxdata, void *handle)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
static...
2018 Jan 20
0
[PATCH nbdkit] filters: Add copy-on-write filter.
...ct nbdkit_next_ops *next_ops, void *nxdata,
+ void *handle)
+{
+ int64_t r;
+
+ r = cow_get_size (next_ops, nxdata, handle);
+ return r >= 0 ? 0 : -1;
+}
+
+/* Whatever the underlying plugin can or can't do, we can write, we
+ * cannot trim, and we can flush.
+ */
+static int
+cow_can_write (struct nbdkit_next_ops *next_ops, void *nxdata, void *handle)
+{
+ return 1;
+}
+
+static int
+cow_can_trim (struct nbdkit_next_ops *next_ops, void *nxdata, void *handle)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int
+cow_can_flush (struct nbdkit_next_ops *next_ops, void *nxdata, void *handle)
+{
+ return 1...
2018 Jan 20
4
[PATCH nbdkit] filters: Add copy-on-write filter.
Eric, you'll probably find the design "interesting" ...
It does work, for me at least.
Rich.
2019 Mar 26
21
[PATCH nbdkit v4 00/15] Implement Block Status.
I'm not sure exactly which version we're up to, but let's say it's
version 4.
I'm a lot happier with this version:
- all filters have been reviewed and changed where I think that's necessary
- can_extents is properly defined and implemented now
- NBD protocol is followed
- I believe it addresses all previous review points where possible
The "only" thing
2019 Mar 28
32
[PATCH nbdkit v5 FINAL 00/19] Implement extents.
This has already been pushed upstream. I am simply posting these here
so we have a reference in the mailing list in case we find bugs later
(as I'm sure we will - it's a complex patch series).
Great thanks to Eric Blake for tireless review on this one. It also
seems to have identified a few minor bugs in qemu along the way.
Rich.
2019 May 16
27
[nbdkit PATCH v2 00/24] implement NBD_CMD_CACHE
Since v1:
- rework .can_cache to be tri-state, with default of no advertisement
(ripple effect through other patches)
- add a lot more patches in order to round out filter support
And in the meantime, Rich pushed NBD_CMD_CACHE support into libnbd, so
in theory we now have a way to test cache commands through the entire
stack.
Eric Blake (24):
server: Internal hooks for implementing
2018 Mar 08
19
[nbdkit PATCH v3 00/15] Add FUA support to nbdkit
After more than a month since v2 [1], I've finally got my FUA
support series polished. This is all of my outstanding patches,
even though some of them were originally posted in separate
threads from the original FUA post [2], [3]
[1] https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2018-January/msg00113.html
[2] https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2018-January/msg00219.html
[3]