Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "coveritscan".
Did you mean:
coverityscan
2018 Nov 25
1
[PATCH] drm/nouveau/bios/ramcfg: fix missing parentheses when calculating RON
...ys going to result
in zero no matter the value of ram->mr[1] because the ! operator has
higher precedence than the shift >> operator. I believe the missing
parentheses around the expression before appying the ! operator will
result in the desired result.
[ Note, not tested ]
Detected by CoveritScan, CID#1324005 ("Operands don't affect result")
Fixes: c25bf7b6155c ("drm/nouveau/bios/ramcfg: Separate out RON pull value")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king at canonical.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/gddr3.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 inserti...
2020 Jan 16
0
[PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 202/671] drm/nouveau/bios/ramcfg: fix missing parentheses when calculating RON
...ys going to result
in zero no matter the value of ram->mr[1] because the ! operator has
higher precedence than the shift >> operator. I believe the missing
parentheses around the expression before appying the ! operator will
result in the desired result.
[ Note, not tested ]
Detected by CoveritScan, CID#1324005 ("Operands don't affect result")
Fixes: c25bf7b6155c ("drm/nouveau/bios/ramcfg: Separate out RON pull value")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king at canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &l...
2020 Jan 16
0
[PATCH AUTOSEL 4.14 111/371] drm/nouveau/bios/ramcfg: fix missing parentheses when calculating RON
...ys going to result
in zero no matter the value of ram->mr[1] because the ! operator has
higher precedence than the shift >> operator. I believe the missing
parentheses around the expression before appying the ! operator will
result in the desired result.
[ Note, not tested ]
Detected by CoveritScan, CID#1324005 ("Operands don't affect result")
Fixes: c25bf7b6155c ("drm/nouveau/bios/ramcfg: Separate out RON pull value")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king at canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &l...
2020 Jan 16
0
[PATCH AUTOSEL 4.9 080/251] drm/nouveau/bios/ramcfg: fix missing parentheses when calculating RON
...ys going to result
in zero no matter the value of ram->mr[1] because the ! operator has
higher precedence than the shift >> operator. I believe the missing
parentheses around the expression before appying the ! operator will
result in the desired result.
[ Note, not tested ]
Detected by CoveritScan, CID#1324005 ("Operands don't affect result")
Fixes: c25bf7b6155c ("drm/nouveau/bios/ramcfg: Separate out RON pull value")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king at canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &l...
2020 Jan 16
0
[PATCH AUTOSEL 4.4 048/174] drm/nouveau/bios/ramcfg: fix missing parentheses when calculating RON
...ys going to result
in zero no matter the value of ram->mr[1] because the ! operator has
higher precedence than the shift >> operator. I believe the missing
parentheses around the expression before appying the ! operator will
result in the desired result.
[ Note, not tested ]
Detected by CoveritScan, CID#1324005 ("Operands don't affect result")
Fixes: c25bf7b6155c ("drm/nouveau/bios/ramcfg: Separate out RON pull value")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king at canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &l...