search for: coveritscan

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "coveritscan".

Did you mean: coverityscan
2018 Nov 25
1
[PATCH] drm/nouveau/bios/ramcfg: fix missing parentheses when calculating RON
...ys going to result in zero no matter the value of ram->mr[1] because the ! operator has higher precedence than the shift >> operator. I believe the missing parentheses around the expression before appying the ! operator will result in the desired result. [ Note, not tested ] Detected by CoveritScan, CID#1324005 ("Operands don't affect result") Fixes: c25bf7b6155c ("drm/nouveau/bios/ramcfg: Separate out RON pull value") Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king at canonical.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/gddr3.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 inserti...
2020 Jan 16
0
[PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 202/671] drm/nouveau/bios/ramcfg: fix missing parentheses when calculating RON
...ys going to result in zero no matter the value of ram->mr[1] because the ! operator has higher precedence than the shift >> operator. I believe the missing parentheses around the expression before appying the ! operator will result in the desired result. [ Note, not tested ] Detected by CoveritScan, CID#1324005 ("Operands don't affect result") Fixes: c25bf7b6155c ("drm/nouveau/bios/ramcfg: Separate out RON pull value") Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king at canonical.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &l...
2020 Jan 16
0
[PATCH AUTOSEL 4.14 111/371] drm/nouveau/bios/ramcfg: fix missing parentheses when calculating RON
...ys going to result in zero no matter the value of ram->mr[1] because the ! operator has higher precedence than the shift >> operator. I believe the missing parentheses around the expression before appying the ! operator will result in the desired result. [ Note, not tested ] Detected by CoveritScan, CID#1324005 ("Operands don't affect result") Fixes: c25bf7b6155c ("drm/nouveau/bios/ramcfg: Separate out RON pull value") Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king at canonical.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &l...
2020 Jan 16
0
[PATCH AUTOSEL 4.9 080/251] drm/nouveau/bios/ramcfg: fix missing parentheses when calculating RON
...ys going to result in zero no matter the value of ram->mr[1] because the ! operator has higher precedence than the shift >> operator. I believe the missing parentheses around the expression before appying the ! operator will result in the desired result. [ Note, not tested ] Detected by CoveritScan, CID#1324005 ("Operands don't affect result") Fixes: c25bf7b6155c ("drm/nouveau/bios/ramcfg: Separate out RON pull value") Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king at canonical.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &l...
2020 Jan 16
0
[PATCH AUTOSEL 4.4 048/174] drm/nouveau/bios/ramcfg: fix missing parentheses when calculating RON
...ys going to result in zero no matter the value of ram->mr[1] because the ! operator has higher precedence than the shift >> operator. I believe the missing parentheses around the expression before appying the ! operator will result in the desired result. [ Note, not tested ] Detected by CoveritScan, CID#1324005 ("Operands don't affect result") Fixes: c25bf7b6155c ("drm/nouveau/bios/ramcfg: Separate out RON pull value") Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king at canonical.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &l...