Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "counterti".
Did you mean:
counterty
2014 Feb 21
12
[LLVMdev] asan coverage
>
>
>
> We may need some additional info.
What kind of additional info?
> I haven't put a ton of thought into
> this, but I'm hoping we can either (a) use debug info as is or add some
> extra (valid) debug info to support this, or (b) add an extra
> debug-info-like section to instrumented binaries with the information we
> need.
>
I'd try this data
2014 Feb 19
2
[LLVMdev] asan coverage
I've built chromium with " -fprofile-instr-generate -fsanitize=address" --
the performance looks good!
The file format from r198638 is indeed rudimentary.
Do you already know how the real output format will look like?
Just to summarize what I think is important:
- minimal size on disk, minimal amount of files
- minimal i/o while writing to disk, no lockf or some such
-