search for: coulter

I was trying, on a Linux system, to get a .Rbuildignore file to work. After far too long, I found the problem was the <CR><NL> line endings in the .Rbuildignore file -- I had originally created it on a Windows system, and emacs in Ubuntu was politely hiding that fact from me. The patterns didn't work to exclude files because it was trying to match filenames to patterns like

...The patch also does away with extraneous curly brackets around variables. This probably trounces someone's shell-scripting style, but functionally, they're useless, and visually, they don't accomplish anything that a syntax-colorizing editor won't already make obvious. -- Nathan Coulter

Full_Name: Nathan Coulter Version: R-2.3.1 OS: Linux Submission from: (NULL) (148.168.40.4) On page 827 of the Reference Index, "intention" is spelled as "intension": Another variety of extension starts with one of the built-in data types, perhaps with the intension of modifying R?s standard behavior...

...g fixes include: - Parsing of arguments for graphics devices - Misc issues with bulleted lists There is also a 30 page manual in the examples sub-directory that describes the various style element and their values, with almost 50 code chunks for illustration. Thanks to Steve Weston, Nathan Coulter, Sarah Goslee and Ralf Herold. Send me any questions or comments, Max ---------------------------------------------------------------------- LEGAL NOTICE\ Unless expressly stated otherwise, this messag...{{dropped}} _______________________________________________ R-packages mailing list R-packa...

attempting to install rJava on R-2.7.0, x86_64 platform, config.log shows the following error: configure:3880: checking whether JNI programs can be compiled configure:3898: gcc -m64 -std=gnu99 -o conftest -g -O2 -I/path/to/x86-64-linux/jdk-1.6.0_06/jre/../include conftest.c -L/path/to/x86-64-linux/jdk-1.6.0_06/jre/lib/amd64/server -L/path/to/x86-64-linux/jdk-1.6.0_06/jre/lib/amd64

I am in a situation where I have to fit a distrution, such as cauchy or normal, to an empirical dataset. Well and good, that is easy. But I wanted to assess just how good the fit is, using ks.test. I am concerned about the following note in the docs (about the example provided): "Note that the distribution theory is not valid here as we have estimated the parameters of the normal

I have run a t.test in R, and received these results: Two Sample t-test data: rsa and umple t = 0.9819, df = 10, p-value = 0.3493 alternative hypothesis: true difference in means is not equal to 0 95 percent confidence interval: -76.1541 196.1541 sample estimates: mean of x mean of y 508.3333 448.3333 Can someone give me a detailed interpretation of the above results? Specifically,

Following up to some extent on Friday's discussion regarding the 'validation' of R, could I ask the list group's opinion on possible advantages of R over Splus from a pharma/devices perspective? I wish to exclude the obvious price difference, which doesn’t seem to carry as much weight as I would have thought. Besides, I have noticed many former Splus users gravitating towards R,

I noticed that it seems there are plans to make ssh-agent setgid. What sort of benefits/drawbacks come from this sort of change ?