Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "coulkd".
Did you mean:
could
2020 Mar 26
4
Multi-Threading Compilers
...er idea of the benefit and turn up other issues.
> It also doesn't solve the problem of Functions themselves -- those are
> also GlobalValues…
I am not sure why not. Function passes should only rely on the information at the callsite & from the declaration IIRC. For functions, we coulkd add extra declarations and update the call sites. But I might be missing something.
Cheers,
Florian
2020 Mar 26
5
Multi-Threading Compilers
...ple.com> wrote:
>>> It also doesn't solve the problem of Functions themselves -- those are
>>> also GlobalValues…
>>
>> I am not sure why not. Function passes should only rely on the information at the callsite & from the declaration IIRC. For functions, we coulkd add extra declarations and update the call sites. But I might be missing something.
>
> Function passes can remove, duplicate, or just plain introduce call
> sites (e.g. recognize a memset pattern), which means the use lists of
> Functions can be changed during a function pass…
Sure,...
2020 Mar 26
2
Multi-Threading Compilers
...n wrote:
>>> It also doesn't solve the problem of Functions themselves -- those are
>>> also GlobalValues…
>>
>>
>> I am not sure why not. Function passes should only rely on the information at the callsite & from the declaration IIRC. For functions, we coulkd add extra declarations and update the call sites. But I might be missing something.
>
> FWIW, I think deleting and creating functions (or globals in general)
> should be hidden behind an API that would allow us to synchronize things
> in parallel runs.
>
> I don't believe...
2006 Jun 30
0
Accessing View methods from Model?
Hey. I have Menu model which recursively renders a menu. Now I want to
use link_to and link_to_unless_current methods from View helpers inside
my Model. Any ideas how I coulkd do that?
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
2020 Mar 25
6
Multi-Threading Compilers
On Mar 25, 2020, at 4:14 PM, Doerfert, Johannes <jdoerfert at anl.gov> wrote:
>
>> Today, you can walk the use-list of any operand to an instruction.
>> This would be broken by this change,
>
> First, you would be able to walk the use-list of any operand. So nothing
> breaks just yet.
If I understand correctly, you are suggesting that you can walk it, but you don’t