search for: coulkd

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "coulkd".

Did you mean: could
2020 Mar 26
4
Multi-Threading Compilers
...er idea of the benefit and turn up other issues. > It also doesn't solve the problem of Functions themselves -- those are > also GlobalValues… I am not sure why not. Function passes should only rely on the information at the callsite & from the declaration IIRC. For functions, we coulkd add extra declarations and update the call sites. But I might be missing something. Cheers, Florian
2020 Mar 26
5
Multi-Threading Compilers
...ple.com> wrote: >>> It also doesn't solve the problem of Functions themselves -- those are >>> also GlobalValues… >> >> I am not sure why not. Function passes should only rely on the information at the callsite & from the declaration IIRC. For functions, we coulkd add extra declarations and update the call sites. But I might be missing something. > > Function passes can remove, duplicate, or just plain introduce call > sites (e.g. recognize a memset pattern), which means the use lists of > Functions can be changed during a function pass… Sure,...
2020 Mar 26
2
Multi-Threading Compilers
...n wrote: >>> It also doesn't solve the problem of Functions themselves -- those are >>> also GlobalValues… >> >> >> I am not sure why not. Function passes should only rely on the information at the callsite & from the declaration IIRC. For functions, we coulkd add extra declarations and update the call sites. But I might be missing something. > > FWIW, I think deleting and creating functions (or globals in general) > should be hidden behind an API that would allow us to synchronize things > in parallel runs. > > I don't believe...
2006 Jun 30
0
Accessing View methods from Model?
Hey. I have Menu model which recursively renders a menu. Now I want to use link_to and link_to_unless_current methods from View helpers inside my Model. Any ideas how I coulkd do that? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
2020 Mar 25
6
Multi-Threading Compilers
On Mar 25, 2020, at 4:14 PM, Doerfert, Johannes <jdoerfert at anl.gov> wrote: > >> Today, you can walk the use-list of any operand to an instruction. >> This would be broken by this change, > > First, you would be able to walk the use-list of any operand. So nothing > breaks just yet. If I understand correctly, you are suggesting that you can walk it, but you don’t