search for: costlier

...;. The R was 2.8.0 and the matlab was 2008a. Here's the performance (time taken in seconds): Matlab R Times Vector version 0.0446 0.067 1.5x For loop version 0.0992 42.209 425.5x So the R is 1.5x costlier for the vector version and 425.5x costlier with matlab. I wonder what we're doing wrong! -- Ajay Shah http://www.mayin.org/ajayshah ajayshah at mayin.org http://ajayshahblog.blogspot.com <*(:-? - wizard who doesn't kno...

...re not strictly needed. An example: mean(apply(t(matrix(as.vector(x) - x0 / h, , nrow=nrow(x), ncol=ncol(x))), c(2) epakern, dim)) / h^dim It would be more _readable_ if I defined the object inside the apply(), stick it there and rm() after, but my feeling is that creating it and than removing is costlier. (If the above structure is too simple, imagine something more complicated) Am I right, it does not matter, since it is created inside anyway? Another question is if apply() could feed the data into the nonfirst argument of the function applied. I have clue just for the first. Thank you, Zsombor...

...nguage Modelling and Diversified Search in information retrieval. Brief Summary of idea: Language Modelling for Information retrieval approach focus on building probabilistic language models for documents and rank document based on probability of model generating the query.Technique is heavy and costlier than the traditional information retrieval technique but has proved to preform better in literature than traditional methods. Language modelling approach performs better as it tries to capture word and phrase association to capture user context. Diversified search is key ways for user satisfactio...

...er with money (and I did purchase and do annually renew my RHEL subscription) or with time (and I have done that, too, both as a Red Hat beta tester (prior to the Enterprise Linux / Fedora Core 'split') and by maintaining the PostgreSQL RPMs as a volunteer for five years, which is a far costlier thing to do!). IMHO, of course. So who wants to be the CentOS-Users to Fedora liaison, likely to be one of the most thankless jobs on the planet?

...them. My second question in similar lines is, is it better to implement - 2 single slot ISDN Card or - 1 multiple slot ISDN Card. While option 1 gives us card level redundancy, option 2 only gives us slot level redundancy. With regards to responsivenes/performance (memory usage et al) is option 1 costlier? Has anyone experienced malfunctioning of some slots an ISDN Card, but other slots in the same card functioning normally? Thanks for sharing your thoughts. -r

...local machine (hence the result > might not run on different machines). > > but, again, does it make a distinction between the three CPUs cited at > top (and yet others)? If the code produced for all three CPUs is the > identical, then there isn't much point in spending for the costlier CPUs. > > And does using "native" give better or worse results than specifying one > of the core* options? > > Also, when compiling a kernel to run on a VM, should some other gcc > option(s) be used? > > > At this point I'd just be making wild guesses about...

> On Sep 9, 2016, at 3:27 PM, Steve Canon via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Sep 9, 2016, at 6:21 PM, Abe Skolnik <a.skolnik at samsung.com <mailto:a.skolnik at samsung.com>> wrote: > >> On 09/09/2016 04:31 PM, Stephen Canon wrote: >> >>> Gating this on -Owhatever is dangerous, .

On 20/04/2020 17:49, Andrea Cucciarre' via samba wrote: > Does the "password server" setting in the smb.conf achieve it? No, you shouldn't use this, you should allow Samba to choose the best DC to use. > > On 4/20/2020 6:40 PM, Andrea Cucciarre' wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Is there a way to provide a list of DC that Samba should try to join? >> I

On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 3:52 AM, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 10:33 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> > wrote: > >> >> >> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 1:29 PM, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 9:19 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> >>>

On Tue, December 8, 2015 11:05, Matthew Miller wrote: > >> I have been bitten by things done in Fedora that only have any use >> on >> a laptop and that should never have been allowed into a server >> distribution. But I cannot see how I would have been aware of them >> until they manifested themselves on equipment under my care. By >> which > > ^

On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 10:33 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 1:29 PM, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote: > >> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 9:19 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 1:15 PM, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at

...her tools, and their subtle interactions. > This is actually a drawback of integration testing - we don't actually want to test those products. And we don't want to make our testing dependent on them, generally - it makes the tests more expensive in a number of ways (more work to setup, costlier to run, more likely to break for non-product reasons, more work to debug because they involve more moving parts). This is one of the tradeoffs of broader testing strategies. > For instance latest darwin i386 profile-rt bug exposed by the improved > profile runtime test coverage will be hard...

...interactions. >> > > This is actually a drawback of integration testing - we don't actually > want to test those products. And we don't want to make our testing > dependent on them, generally - it makes the tests more expensive in a > number of ways (more work to setup, costlier to run, more likely to break > for non-product reasons, more work to debug because they involve more > moving parts). This is one of the tradeoffs of broader testing strategies. > > >> For instance latest darwin i386 profile-rt bug exposed by the improved >> profile runtime...

...uff drives you crazy, they even have listed reasonable, flat rates on doing the dirty setup work for you. HostingRails implements fastcgi differently than other host providers and performance is truly fast. In fact it''s fast enough for running many real-world projects without resorting to costlier Mongrel servers or other long running process solutions if that''s an issue for you. I know it sounds like a commercial and I can''t really help that. I just think that if you are new to Rails, you''ll be hard pressed to match, let alone beat the exceptional blend of price,...

...interactions. >> > > This is actually a drawback of integration testing - we don't actually > want to test those products. And we don't want to make our testing > dependent on them, generally - it makes the tests more expensive in a > number of ways (more work to setup, costlier to run, more likely to break > for non-product reasons, more work to debug because they involve more > moving parts). This is one of the tradeoffs of broader testing strategies. > So you think it is ok to make assumption that everything will just work and release it to the customer? >...

...t; >> >> This is actually a drawback of integration testing - we don't actually >> want to test those products. And we don't want to make our testing >> dependent on them, generally - it makes the tests more expensive in a >> number of ways (more work to setup, costlier to run, more likely to break >> for non-product reasons, more work to debug because they involve more >> moving parts). This is one of the tradeoffs of broader testing strategies. >> > > So you think it is ok to make assumption that everything will just work > and release...

...>> This is actually a drawback of integration testing - we don't actually >>> want to test those products. And we don't want to make our testing >>> dependent on them, generally - it makes the tests more expensive in a >>> number of ways (more work to setup, costlier to run, more likely to break >>> for non-product reasons, more work to debug because they involve more >>> moving parts). This is one of the tradeoffs of broader testing strategies. >>> >> >> So you think it is ok to make assumption that everything will just w...

Sean and Alexey have said a lot on this topic. Here is my version of explanation that LLVM testing is not suitable to replace end to end testing. - The most important reason being that LLVM tests tend to test 'implementation details'. This has many drawbacks: a) by only writing test cases like this, it is hard to expose bugs inherited in the implementation itself; b) the connection

On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 2:10 PM, Alexey Samsonov <vonosmas at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 1:34 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 1:31 PM, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 1:11 PM, David Blaikie