search for: cospi

Displaying 14 results from an estimated 14 matches for "cospi".

Did you mean: compi
2009 May 14
2
How to do a pretty panel plot?
...---------------------------------------------------------- M <- structure(list(date = structure(c(13634, 13665, 13695, 13726, 13757, 13787, 13818, 13848, 13879, 13910, 13939, 13970, 14000, 14031, 14061, 14092, 14123, 14153, 14184, 14214, 14245, 14276, 14304, 14335), class = "Date"), cospi = c(1987.31, 2033.37, 2140.13, 2120.66, 2427.09, 2917.7, 2915.28, 3262.06, 2616.26, 2617.75, 2277.69, 2538.13, 2374.09, 1911.22, 2063.73, 2081.28, 1813.58, 1304.96, 1219.73, 1361.74, 1299.2, 1242.74, 1339.18, 1557.29), cospi.PE = c(19.2, 19.69, 20.13, 24.08, 27.61, 30.9, 30.69, 34.92,...
2016 Dec 01
1
Different results for cos,sin,tan and cospi,sinpi,tanpi
...TION=C attached base packages: [1] stats graphics grDevices utils datasets methods base It's not a very good example... f0<-function(x,y)exp(complex(real=x,imag=y)) f1<-function(x,y)complex(real=exp(1)^x*cos(y),imag=exp(1)^x*sin(y)) f2<-function(x,y)complex(real=exp(1)^x*cospi(y/pi),imag=exp(1)^x*sinpi(y/pi)) f0(700,1.23) f1(700,1.23) f2(700,1.23) f0(700,1.23e23) f1(700,1.23e23) f2(700,1.23e23) Garbage number is required. Thank you! 2016-12-01 18:31 GMT+09:00 Prof Brian Ripley <ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk>: > Please note that you need to report your platforms...
2016 Dec 01
2
Different results for cos,sin,tan and cospi,sinpi,tanpi
Hi, i try sin, cos, and tan. > sapply(c(cos,sin,tan),function(x,y)x(y),1.23e45*pi) [1] 0.5444181 0.8388140 1.5407532 However, *pi results the following > sapply(c(cospi,sinpi,tanpi),function(x,y)x(y),1.23e45) [1] 1 0 0 Please try whether the following becomes all right. diff -ruN R-3.3.2.orig/src/nmath/cospi.c R-3.3.2/src/nmath/cospi.c --- R-3.3.2.orig/src/nmath/cospi.c 2016-09-15 07:15:31.000000000 +0900 +++ R-3.3.2/src/nmath/cospi.c 2016-12-01 13:54:38....
2016 Dec 01
0
Different results for cos,sin,tan and cospi,sinpi,tanpi
Please note that you need to report your platforms (as per the posting guide), as the C function starts #ifdef HAVE_COSPI #elif defined HAVE___COSPI double cospi(double x) { return __cospi(x); } And AFAICS the system versions on Solaris and OS X behave the same way as R's substitute. On 01/12/2016 09:12, Martin Maechler wrote: >>>>>> Martin Maechler <maechler at stat.math.ethz.ch>...
2016 Sep 09
3
Different results for tan(pi/2) and tanpi(1/2)
As the subject line says, we get different results for tan(pi/2) and tanpi(1/2), though this should not be the case: > tan(pi/2) [1] 1.633124e+16 > tanpi(1/2) [1] NaN Warning message: In tanpi(1/2) : NaNs produced By redefining tanpi with sinpi and cospi, we can get closer: > tanpi <- function(x) sinpi(x) / cospi(x) > tanpi(c(0, 1/2, 1, 3/2, 2)) [1] 0 Inf 0 -Inf 0 Hans Werner
2016 Dec 01
2
Different results for cos,sin,tan and cospi,sinpi,tanpi
...> on Thu, 1 Dec 2016 14:39:55 +0900 writes: >> Hi, >> i try sin, cos, and tan. >>> sapply(c(cos,sin,tan),function(x,y)x(y),1.23e45*pi) >> [1] 0.5444181 0.8388140 1.5407532 >> However, *pi results the following >>> sapply(c(cospi,sinpi,tanpi),function(x,y)x(y),1.23e45) >> [1] 1 0 0 >> Please try whether the following becomes all right. > [..............................] > Yes, it does -- the fix will be in all future versions of R. oops.... not so quickly, Martin! Of course, the resul...
2017 Feb 17
1
Wish List: Extensions to the derivatives table
...ll("/", D(expr[[2]], name), make.call("+", 1., expr[[2]])), log2 = make.call("/", make.call("/", D(expr[[2]], name), expr[[2]]), quote(log(2)) ), log10 = make.call("/", make.call("/", D(expr[[2]], name), expr[[2]]), quote(log(10)) ), cospi = make.call("*", make.call("*", make.call("sinpi", expr[[2]]), make.call("-", D(expr[[2]], name))), quote(pi)), sinpi = make.call("*", make.call("*", make.call("cospi", expr[[2]]), D(expr[[2]], name)), quote(pi)), tanpi = mak...
2017 Feb 17
4
Wish List: Extensions to the derivatives table
...anguage. R is faster but less flexible, since that table is programmed in C. It would be useful if R provided a mechanism for extending the derivative table, or barring that, provided a broader table. Currently unsupported mathematical functions of one argument include expm1, log1p, log2, log10, cospi, sinpi, and tanpi. While manual differentiation of these proposed additions is straight-forward, their absence complicates what otherwise could be much simpler, such as using deriv() or deriv3() to generate functions, for example to use as an nls model. Thanks, [[alternative HTML version delete...
2016 Sep 09
3
Different results for tan(pi/2) and tanpi(1/2)
...tanpi(1/2), though this should not be the case: >> >> > tan(pi/2) >> [1] 1.633124e+16 >> >> > tanpi(1/2) >> [1] NaN >> Warning message: >> In tanpi(1/2) : NaNs produced >> >> By redefining tanpi with sinpi and cospi, we can get closer: >> >> > tanpi <- function(x) sinpi(x) / cospi(x) >> >> > tanpi(c(0, 1/2, 1, 3/2, 2)) >> [1] 0 Inf 0 -Inf 0 >> >> Hans Werner >> >> ______________________________________________ >> R-devel...
2016 Sep 09
0
Different results for tan(pi/2) and tanpi(1/2)
...e case: >>> >>> > tan(pi/2) >>> [1] 1.633124e+16 >>> >>> > tanpi(1/2) >>> [1] NaN >>> Warning message: >>> In tanpi(1/2) : NaNs produced >>> >>> By redefining tanpi with sinpi and cospi, we can get closer: >>> >>> > tanpi <- function(x) sinpi(x) / cospi(x) >>> >>> > tanpi(c(0, 1/2, 1, 3/2, 2)) >>> [1] 0 Inf 0 -Inf 0 >>> >>> Hans Werner >>> >>> ___________________________...
2017 Feb 17
0
Wish List: Extensions to the derivatives table
...r but less > flexible, since that table is programmed in C. It would be useful if R > provided a mechanism for extending the derivative table, or barring that, > provided a broader table. Currently unsupported mathematical functions of > one argument include expm1, log1p, log2, log10, cospi, sinpi, and tanpi. > > While manual differentiation of these proposed additions is > straight-forward, their absence complicates what otherwise could be much > simpler, such as using deriv() or deriv3() to generate functions, for > example to use as an nls model. > > Thanks, &g...
2003 May 25
3
Vorbis vs Speex
Hi, I have downloaded Vorbis and played with it, and I have downloaded Speex but not yet played with it. My understanding is that Vorbis is targetted at high-quality audio (music) while Speex is targetted at speech quality audio (telephoney and such). So I have two questions to ask the group: 1. Which would your experiences show is the better codec for recording high quality speech such
2017 Aug 18
4
No rule to make target all.R, needed by compiler.rdb building R 3.4.1 from source, Scientific Linux release 6.9 (Carbon)
...library not generating libtre.a: *rm -rf libnmath.a* *ar -cr libnmath.a mlutils.o d1mach.o i1mach.o fmax2.o fmin2.o fprec.o fround.o ftrunc.o sign.o fsign.o imax2.o imin2.o chebyshev.o log1p.o expm1.o lgammacor.o gammalims.o stirlerr.o bd0.o gamma.o lgamma.o gamma_cody.o beta.o lbeta.o polygamma.o cospi.o bessel_i.o bessel_j.o bessel_k.o bessel_y.o choose.o snorm.o sexp.o dgamma.o pgamma.o qgamma.o rgamma.o dbeta.o pbeta.o qbeta.o rbeta.o dunif.o punif.o qunif.o runif.o dnorm.o pnorm.o qnorm.o rnorm.o dlnorm.o plnorm.o qlnorm.o rlnorm.o df.o pf.o qf.o rf.o dnf.o dt.o pt.o qt.o rt.o dnt.o dchisq.o...
2018 Feb 09
1
R Compilation gets stuck on Windows 64
Please note that building R on Windows is documented in "R Installation and Administration", including links to external software. Particularly there is a link to texinfo which is part of Rtools. The documentation is maintained and it is a sufficient source of information for building R on Windows. https://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/r-release/R-admin.html