search for: cosmat

...ing there still are some non significant coefficients. I'd like to try the command "leap". However, I don't quite understand how it returns the spared predicting variables. Can please, someone help ? Tank you in advance. Mara EM > summary(stepmod) Call: lm(formula = yy ~ cosmat[, 1] + cosmat[, 2] + cosmat[, 3] + cosmat[, 4] + cosmat[, 5] + cosmat[, 6] + cosmat[, 7] + cosmat[, 8] + cosmat[, 9] + cosmat[, 11] + cosmat[, 12] + cosmat[, 15] + cosmat[, 16] + cosmat[, 17] + cosmat[, 22] + cosmat[, 25] + cosmat[, 29] + cosmat[, 30] + cosmat[, 31] + cosmat[, 38] +...

...egards, Maura ******************************************************************** T <- xx$timestamp[end] - xx$timestamp[start] nsamples <- end +1 - start nfr <- ceiling(nsamples/2) yy <- xx[start:end,"amplitude"] tt <- xx[start:end,"timestamp"] cosmat <- matrix(nrow=nsamples,ncol=nfr) coscol <- NULL sinmat <- matrix(nrow=nsamples,ncol=nfr) sincol <- NULL for(i in 1:nfr){ cosmat[,i] <- cos(tt*2*pi*i/T) coscol <- c(coscol,paste("cos",i,sep="")) sinmat[,i] <- sin(tt*2*pi*i/T)...

On 16/04/16 21:09, L.P.H. van Belle wrote: > New update. > > > > I now have done about 6 machines. > > 2 with samba 4.2.10 work fine, 2 not. > > 1 with samba 4.3.7 works fine, 1 not. > > > > I saw Jelmer updated the samba to 4.3.8 in sid, so i recompiled these to jessie. > > I upgraded the 4.3.7 to 4.3.8 Hi Louis, debian 4.2.10 is the same as

.... > > > If I remember correctly, you use your own certificates, I don't, I > > wonder if this could be a problem ? > No, i checked that to, that was the first i checked. > > And strangly > wbinfo --user-info username , works also fine. > Maybe its a "cosmatic" bug since everything works but like a bug in how > the out is done,.. now im just bit guessing..  its really strange. > > .. I'm done for today... > I'll make a good log tomorror for debugging and post it, maybe someone > will see something.. > > >...