search for: coreplus

...g SWAT # from linux (192.168.123.179) # Date: 2002/09/03 22:49:37 # Global parameters [global] workgroup = FIREMUN netbios name = SERVER map to guest = Bad User null passwords = Yes username map = /etc/samba/user.map log level = 10 protocol = COREPLUS max protocol = COREPLUS socket options = SO_KEEPALIVE TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_LOWDELAY character set = ISO8859-15 os level = 2 wins support = Yes default service = global comment = Rootverzeichnis path = / username = onewaypub,root...

...lock directory = /usr/local/samba/var/locks locking = yes mangled names = yes max log size = 64 message command = /usr/local/samba/bin/procmessage %s %f & oplocks = yes os level = 65 password level = 5 preferred master = yes preserve case = yes ; protocol = CORE ; protocol = COREPLUS ; protocol = LANMAN1 ; protocol = NT1 read prediction = yes read raw = yes ; security = user security = share server string = CompAs Software Samba Server share modes = yes short preserve case = no smbrun = /usr/local/samba/bin/smbrun socket options = TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_LOWDELAY S...

...he "max protocol" section) correlate to the Microsoft jargon for the different logon protocols. Here is what I've determined. Could some please verify this for me? Samba Microsoft CORE ??? (Something really old that I don't care about) COREPLUS ??? (Something really old that I don't care about) LANMAN LAN Manager (LM) LANMAN2 LAN Manager (LM) NT1 NTLMv1 ** Not Supported NTLMv2 Microsoft does not seem to differentiate between a LANMAN and a LANMAN2 on their website, I usu...

Greetings all, I'm running a RedHat 5.0 (kernel 2.0.32) Linux box with samba 1.9.18p7 and I'm having a problem with my netlogon share. NT domain logons are working just fine, but I keep getting the following message in /var/log/messages, repeated every day for every user logging in: May 26 09:08:09 gromit PAM_pwdb[23002]: 1 authentication failure; (uid=0) -> [username] for samba

...d to use the -i <scope> option to nmbd, smbd, and smbclient. All your PCs will need to have the same setting for this to work. I do not recommend scope IDs. CHOOSING THE PROTOCOL LEVEL =========================== The SMB protocol has many dialects. Currently Samba supports 5, called CORE, COREPLUS, LANMAN1, LANMAN2 and NT1. You can choose what maximum protocol to support in the smb.conf file. The default is NT1 and that is the best for the vast majority of sites. In older versions of Samba you may have found it necessary to use COREPLUS. The limitations that led to this have mostly been fi...

...tomounted volume. What may be the cause of this behaviour? I'll appreciate your help. Included is our smb.conf: ;---------------------------------------- [global] printing = bsd printcap name = /usr/local/samba/lib/printcap load printers = no guest account = nobody ; protocol = COREPLUS ; browseable = yes ; getwd cache = Yes log file = /usr/local/samba/log.%m dead time = 15 ; Put a capping on the size of the log files (in Kb) max log size = 20 ; Options for handling file name case sensitivity and / or preservation ; Case Sensitivity breaks many WfW and Win95 apps...

...asswd %u passwd chat = *Enter\snew\sUNIX\spassword:* %n\n *Retype\snew\sUNIX\spas sword:* %n\n . username map = /etc/samba/smbusers log level = 2 syslog = 0 max log size = 0 debug pid = Yes large readwrite = Yes min protocol = COREPLUS deadtime = 5 socket options = IPTOS_LOWDELAY TCP_NODELAY SO_SNDBUF=4096 SO_RCVBUF=409 6 load printers = No dns proxy = No wins server = 172.16.0.11 invalid users = root hosts deny = 172.16.16.16 hide unreadable = Yes [homes]...

...uot;-s smb.conf" I also captured some packets. I found the client claims that it can support SMB1 (neither smb2002 nor smb2???). then got message "unrecognized protocol dialect", but I check the source code in negprot.c (not exact) and find "SMB2" is an option (like CORE or COREPLUS). My question is: why smbclient does not recognized "SMB2". Do I miss some configuration parameters? Could you please tell me? Thanks a lot 2:--------------------------------------- I installed both samba master (that may be the newest version, samba-4.1.0) at client: smbclient4 -m SMB2...

I don't have any lines in my configuration file for any of the servers, how can I tell what the default protocols are? Are the defaults controlled by samba or the kernel? Chris On 6/15/2020 2:13 PM, Fred Smith wrote: > On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 11:23:54AM -0500, Christopher Wensink wrote: >> I have a handful of Linux Servers, running Centos 6.10, and 6.8 with the >> main host

...ooks a bit like the infamous "DIR ..\" bug in NT (which Microsoft first blamed on Samba!). If you have Warp 4 or Connect I would very much appreciate it if you could try and see if you get the same problem. One final note: when smbclient is forced to use one of the older SMB protocols (-m COREPLUS or smaller), the problem is gone. Of course, you'll lose support for long file names then, and many other things. > > Technical information: (you may skip this if you just want to use the patch!) > At first I thought that this may be a buffer overflow problem in IBM Peer. That's b...

The "valid users" parameter already existed in version 3 of the SAMBA and indicated which users were allowed to access the share. The "username" parameter indicated which user should be used when it was not defined at the time of mapping. SMB.CONF [folder] ... username = userX valid users = userX, userY, ... To map the "folder" share, only the following line was

...ty = DOMAIN encrypt passwords = Yes password server = de0-dc01.eu.airbus.corp, de0-dc02.eu.airbus.corp, de0-dc03.eu.airbus.corp, fr0-dc01.eu.airbus.corp password level = 6 username level = 6 lanman auth = No # ntlm auth = No log level = 3 max log size = 500 syslog = 0 debug uid = Yes min protocol = COREPLUS lm announce = No preferred master = No local master = No domain master = No browse list = no enhanced browsing = No dns proxy = No wins server = 44.191.123.130 44.191.124.130 wins support = No create mask = 0660 directory mask = 0770 case sensitive = No default case = lower preserve case = Yes shor...

...client uses an appropriate protocol but still fails with similar messages. So, I'm a bit stumped. Is this an encryption issue? - I noticed some mention of 'challenge' in the logs. I have since compiled the DES stuff in, but not yet tried it, I assumed using a lower protocol (even tried COREPLUS) would fall back to using its authentication method..... Anyone have any suggestions? I'll append some log extracts in the hope it helps (the Samba host is zeppo, the Win95 PC is chico and the DOS client is shagnasty). Thanks, Simon ----- 8<-=-=-=-=-=- smb.conf -=-=-=-=-=- [global] p...

...should not be set as the automatic negotiation phase in the SMB protocol takes care of choosing the appropriate protocol. The value default refers to the latest supported protocol, currently SMB3_11. See client max protocol for a full list of available protocols. The values CORE, COREPLUS, LANMAN1, LANMAN2 are silently upgraded to NT1. Default: client ipc max protocol = default Example: client ipc max protocol = SMB2_10 client ipc min protocol (G) This setting controls the minimum protocol version that the will be attempted to use for IPC$ connections as DCERPC...

...should not be set as the automatic negotiation phase in the SMB protocol takes care of choosing the appropriate protocol. The value default refers to the latest supported protocol, currently SMB3_11. See client max protocol for a full list of available protocols. The values CORE, COREPLUS, LANMAN1, LANMAN2 are silently upgraded to NT1. Default: client ipc max protocol = default Example: client ipc max protocol = SMB2_10 client ipc min protocol (G) This setting controls the minimum protocol version that the will be attempted to use for IPC$ connections as DCERPC...

...ans client tools like smbclient and other, as well as applications making use of libsmbclient are no longer able to connect to servers without SMB2 or SMB3 support (by default). It's still possible to allow SMB1 dialects, e.g. NT1, LANMAN2 and LANMAN1 for client and server, as well as CORE and COREPLUS on the client. Note that most commandline tools e.g. smbclient, smbcacls and others also support the --option argument to overwrite smb.conf options, e.g. --option='client min protocol=NT1' might be useful. As Microsoft no longer installs SMB1 support in recent releases or uninstalls it a...

...ans client tools like smbclient and other, as well as applications making use of libsmbclient are no longer able to connect to servers without SMB2 or SMB3 support (by default). It's still possible to allow SMB1 dialects, e.g. NT1, LANMAN2 and LANMAN1 for client and server, as well as CORE and COREPLUS on the client. Note that most commandline tools e.g. smbclient, smbcacls and others also support the --option argument to overwrite smb.conf options, e.g. --option='client min protocol=NT1' might be useful. As Microsoft no longer installs SMB1 support in recent releases or uninstalls it a...

...his allows you to # change your config based on what the client calls # you. Your server can have a ``dual personality''. # %M the Internet name of the client machine. # %R the selected protocol level after protocol negotia- # tion. It can be one of CORE, COREPLUS, LANMAN1, # LANMAN2 or NT1. # %d The process id of the current server process. # %a the architecture of the remote machine. Only some # are recognized, and those may not be 100% reliable. # It currently recognizes Samba, Windows for Work- # groups, Windows...

...ans client tools like smbclient and other, as well as applications making use of libsmbclient are no longer able to connect to servers without SMB2 or SMB3 support (by default). It's still possible to allow SMB1 dialects, e.g. NT1, LANMAN2 and LANMAN1 for client and server, as well as CORE and COREPLUS on the client. Note that most commandline tools e.g. smbclient, smbcacls and others also support the '--option' argument to overwrite smb.conf options, e.g. --option='client min protocol=NT1' might be useful. As Microsoft no longer installs SMB1 support in recent releases or unins...

...ans client tools like smbclient and other, as well as applications making use of libsmbclient are no longer able to connect to servers without SMB2 or SMB3 support (by default). It's still possible to allow SMB1 dialects, e.g. NT1, LANMAN2 and LANMAN1 for client and server, as well as CORE and COREPLUS on the client. Note that most commandline tools e.g. smbclient, smbcacls and others also support the '--option' argument to overwrite smb.conf options, e.g. --option='client min protocol=NT1' might be useful. As Microsoft no longer installs SMB1 support in recent releases or unins...