search for: copy_buffer_len

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "copy_buffer_len".

2020 May 04
3
Parallel transfers with sftp (call for testing / advice)
Le 10/04/2020 ? 01:55, Darren Tucker a ?crit?: > On Thu, 9 Apr 2020 at 01:34, Cyril Servant <cyril.servant at gmail.com> wrote: > [...] >> Each of our front >> nodes has an outgoing bandwidth limit (let's say 1Gb/s each, generally more >> limited by the CPU than by the network bandwidth), > You might also want to experiment with the Ciphers and MACs since >
2006 Apr 01
0
sftp tab completion patch (First release - NOT FOR INCLUDING YET)
...el, EL_SIGNAL, 1); el_source(el, NULL); + + /* Tab Completion */ + el_set(el, EL_ADDFN, "ftp-complete", + "Context senstive argument completion", complete); + el_set(el, EL_BIND, "^I", "ftp-complete", NULL); } conn = do_init(fd_in, fd_out, copy_buffer_len, num_requests);
2007 Dec 12
0
Revisiting sftp tab completion patch
...el, EL_SIGNAL, 1); el_source(el, NULL); + + /* Tab Completion */ + el_set(el, EL_ADDFN, "ftp-complete", + "Context senstive argument completion", complete); + el_set(el, EL_BIND, "^I", "ftp-complete", NULL); } conn = do_init(fd_in, fd_out, copy_buffer_len, num_requests); if (conn == NULL) fatal("Couldn't initialise connection to server"); - pwd = do_realpath(conn, "."); - if (pwd == NULL) + remote_path = do_realpath(conn, "."); + if (remote_path == NULL) fatal("Need cwd"); if (file1 != NULL...
2020 May 05
7
Parallel transfers with sftp (call for testing / advice)
...course this value can be discussed and easily changed (it's the base_chunk_size variable). In order to be more exact, a chunk size will be a multiple of base_chunk_size, so a 4GB file transferred with 4 channels will be cut in 4 1GB chunks. The main source of errors during reassembly is if the copy_buffer_len (-B option) is set to a "non power of 2" value. This will lead to writes sitting partially on 2 blocks, and probably corrupt the file. Writing simultaneously the start and the end of a block on 2 different NFS clients is a really bad idea. That's why I issue a warning if -n > 0 and...