search for: copy0mbb

...true/false values to select between, and a branch opcode to use. const BasicBlock *LLVM_BB = BB->getBasicBlock(); MachineFunction::iterator It = BB; ++It; // thisMBB: // ... // TrueVal = ... // setcc r1, r2, r3 // bNE r1, r0, copy1MBB // fallthrough --> copy0MBB MachineBasicBlock *thisMBB = BB; MachineFunction *F = BB->getParent(); MachineBasicBlock *copy0MBB = F->CreateMachineBasicBlock(LLVM_BB); MachineBasicBlock *sinkMBB = F->CreateMachineBasicBlock(LLVM_BB); F->insert(It, copy0MBB); F->insert(It, sinkMBB); // Tran...

...true/false values to select between, and a branch opcode to use. const BasicBlock *LLVM_BB = BB->getBasicBlock(); MachineFunction::iterator It = BB; ++It; // thisMBB: // ... // TrueVal = ... // setcc r1, r2, r3 // bNE r1, r0, copy1MBB // fallthrough --> copy0MBB MachineBasicBlock *thisMBB = BB; MachineFunction *F = BB->getParent(); MachineBasicBlock *copy0MBB = F->CreateMachineBasicBlock(LLVM_BB); MachineBasicBlock *sinkMBB = F->CreateMachineBasicBlock(LLVM_BB); F->insert(It, copy0MBB); F->insert(It, sinkMBB); // Tran...

After discussions last night, I'm leaning towards going legit with all my pseudo expansions in Mips 16. Some I think I can clearly do by just putting in the proper side effects of implicit registers (T8 the condition code register as used by mips 16). But I'm still left with some pseudos that have jmp .+4 type instructions in them. The original Mips port was to Mips I and Mips I,

...ually have to insert their + // control-flow patterns. const BasicBlock *LLVM_BB = BB->getBasicBlock(); ilist<MachineBasicBlock>::iterator It = BB; ++It; - - // thisMBB: - // ... - // TrueVal = ... - // cmpTY ccX, r1, r2 - // bCC copy1MBB - // fallthrough --> copy0MBB - MachineBasicBlock *thisMBB = BB; - MachineBasicBlock *copy0MBB = new MachineBasicBlock(LLVM_BB); - MachineBasicBlock *sinkMBB = new MachineBasicBlock(LLVM_BB); - unsigned SelectPred = MI->getOperand(4).getImm(); - BuildMI(BB, TII->get(PPC::BCC)) - .addImm(SelectPred).addReg(MI->g...

PPCTargetLowering::EmitInstrWithCustomInserter has a reference to the current MachineFunction for other purposes. Can you use MachineFunction::getRegInfo instead? Dan On Jul 8, 2008, at 1:56 PM, Gary Benson wrote: > Would it be acceptable to change MachineInstr::getRegInfo from private > to public so I can use it from > PPCTargetLowering::EmitInstrWithCustomInserter? > >

...ructions we actually have to insert their + // control-flow patterns. const BasicBlock *LLVM_BB = BB->getBasicBlock(); MachineFunction::iterator It = BB; ++It; - - // thisMBB: - // ... - // TrueVal = ... - // cmpTY ccX, r1, r2 - // bCC copy1MBB - // fallthrough --> copy0MBB - MachineBasicBlock *thisMBB = BB; + MachineFunction *F = BB->getParent(); - MachineBasicBlock *copy0MBB = F->CreateMachineBasicBlock(LLVM_BB); - MachineBasicBlock *sinkMBB = F->CreateMachineBasicBlock(LLVM_BB); - unsigned SelectPred = MI->getOperand(4).getImm(); - BuildMI(BB, T...

Hi Gary, This does not patch cleanly for me (PPCISelLowering.cpp). Can you prepare a updated patch? Thanks, Evan On Jul 10, 2008, at 11:45 AM, Gary Benson wrote: > Cool, that worked. New patch attached... > > Cheers, > Gary > > Evan Cheng wrote: >> Just cast both values to const TargetRegisterClass*. >> >> Evan >> >> On Jul 10, 2008, at 7:36

Just cast both values to const TargetRegisterClass*. Evan On Jul 10, 2008, at 7:36 AM, Gary Benson wrote: > Evan Cheng wrote: >> How about? >> >> const TargetRegisterClass *RC = is64Bit ? &PPC:GPRCRegClass : >> &PPC:G8RCRegClass; >> unsigned TmpReg = RegInfo.createVirtualRegister(RC); > > I tried something like that yesterday: > > const

Evan Cheng wrote: > How about? > > const TargetRegisterClass *RC = is64Bit ? &PPC:GPRCRegClass : > &PPC:G8RCRegClass; > unsigned TmpReg = RegInfo.createVirtualRegister(RC); I tried something like that yesterday: const TargetRegisterClass *RC = is64bit ? &PPC::GPRCRegClass : &PPC::G8RCRegClass; but I kept getting this error no matter how I arranged it:

You need to insert new basic blocks and update CFG to accomplish this. There is a hackish way to do this right now. Add a pseudo instruction to represent this operation and mark it usesCustomDAGSchedInserter. This means the intrinsic is mapped to a single (pseudo) node. But it is then expanded into instructions that can span multiple basic blocks. See

...ually have to insert their + // control-flow patterns. const BasicBlock *LLVM_BB = BB->getBasicBlock(); ilist<MachineBasicBlock>::iterator It = BB; ++It; - - // thisMBB: - // ... - // TrueVal = ... - // cmpTY ccX, r1, r2 - // bCC copy1MBB - // fallthrough --> copy0MBB - MachineBasicBlock *thisMBB = BB; - MachineBasicBlock *copy0MBB = new MachineBasicBlock(LLVM_BB); - MachineBasicBlock *sinkMBB = new MachineBasicBlock(LLVM_BB); - unsigned SelectPred = MI->getOperand(4).getImm(); - BuildMI(BB, TII->get(PPC::BCC)) - .addImm(SelectPred).addReg(MI->g...

Would it be acceptable to change MachineInstr::getRegInfo from private to public so I can use it from PPCTargetLowering::EmitInstrWithCustomInserter? Cheers, Gary Evan Cheng wrote: > Look for createVirtualRegister. These are examples in > PPCISelLowering.cpp. > > Evan > On Jul 8, 2008, at 8:24 AM, Gary Benson wrote: > > > Hi Evan, > > > > Evan Cheng wrote:

Chris Lattner wrote: > On Jun 27, 2008, at 8:27 AM, Gary Benson wrote: > > def CMP_UNRESw : Pseudo<(outs), (ins GPRC:$rA, GPRC:$rB, i32imm: > > $label), > > "cmpw $rA, $rB\n\tbne- La${label}_exit", > > [(PPCcmp_unres GPRC:$rA, GPRC:$rB, imm: > > $label)]>; > > } > > > > ...and

...ually have to insert their + // control-flow patterns. const BasicBlock *LLVM_BB = BB->getBasicBlock(); ilist<MachineBasicBlock>::iterator It = BB; ++It; - - // thisMBB: - // ... - // TrueVal = ... - // cmpTY ccX, r1, r2 - // bCC copy1MBB - // fallthrough --> copy0MBB - MachineBasicBlock *thisMBB = BB; - MachineBasicBlock *copy0MBB = new MachineBasicBlock(LLVM_BB); - MachineBasicBlock *sinkMBB = new MachineBasicBlock(LLVM_BB); - unsigned SelectPred = MI->getOperand(4).getImm(); - BuildMI(BB, TII->get(PPC::BCC)) - .addImm(SelectPred).addReg(MI->g...

...// sanity check before we build J*_ri instruction. > + assert (isInt<32>(imm32)); > BuildMI(BB, DL, TII.get(NewCC)) > .addReg(LHS) > - .addImm(MI.getOperand(2).getImm()) > + .addImm(imm32) > .addMBB(Copy1MBB); > + } > > // Copy0MBB: > // %FalseValue = ... > diff --git a/lib/Target/BPF/BPFInstrInfo.td b/lib/Target/BPF/BPFInstrInfo.td > index f683578..56f0f9c 100644 > --- a/lib/Target/BPF/BPFInstrInfo.td > +++ b/lib/Target/BPF/BPFInstrInfo.td > @@ -464,7 +464,7 @@ let usesCustomInserter = 1 in { >...

Hi, I've tagged the 5.0.1-rc2 release, go ahead and start testing and report your results. -Tom