search for: conversione

...r/053277.html Uhm... I read the discussion, probably I've not understood the problem well: the conclusion (it has been committed?) is that to handle address space conversion that imply a change in the size of pointers must be expressed as a pair ptrtoint/inttoptr. What if the address space conversione logically change also the value of the pointer? Indeed, trying to port that solution in the context of in-progress proposal: how to handle the fact that the addrspace information is logical? Is the frontend that need to produce the correct address space conversion? Why having an opaque instruct...

Buenas, Sigo aprobechando par aaprender en las vacaciones de alumnos y nuevamente recurro a Uds. Sé que la perspectiva puede ser erronea, o sea que les pido que entiendan lo que quiero decir, más que lo que digo. Tengo una lista de matrices todas de idénticas dimensiones, y necesito hacer operaciones entre ellas. Ocurrencia: creí que podría hacer un array, de tal manera que , así como puedo

...no lo más práctico, matemáticamente es muy lindo utilizar matrices y > se ve bien al correr en la computadora, pero lleva mucho tiempo y esfuerzo. > Piense que en el código que usted envía hay tres renglones, y en dos > utiliza as.matrix, as.array, as.list, usted está forzando muchas > conversiones, no digo que no se pueda, pero si estandariza a un tipo de > datos esas tres conversiones son menos trabajo para la computadora. > > Javier Rubén Marcuzzi > > El mié., 4 jul. 2018 a las 8:29, Juan Abasolo (<juan.abasolo en ehu.eus>) > escribió: > >> Buenas, >&gt...

...gt; Uhm... I read the discussion, probably I've not understood the problem > well: the conclusion (it has been committed?) is that to handle address space > conversion that imply a change in the size of pointers must be expressed as a > pair ptrtoint/inttoptr. What if the address space conversione logically change > also the value of the pointer? > > Indeed, trying to port that solution in the context of in-progress > proposal: how to handle the fact that the addrspace information is logical? Is > the frontend that need to produce the correct address space conversion? > Wh...

...77.html > > Uhm... I read the discussion, probably I've not understood the problem well: the conclusion (it has been committed?) is that to handle address space conversion that imply a change in the size of pointers must be expressed as a pair ptrtoint/inttoptr. What if the address space conversione logically change also the value of the pointer? I recently committed patches to reject bitcasts if the address space pointers are different sizes, and accept them if they are the same size as was concluded in the thread. I would like to reject all cross address space bitcasts since it would make s...

This is something I proposed last year, so you might want to read up on that discussion first. You can find it here: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2012-September/053277.html micah > -----Original Message----- > From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] > On Behalf Of Michele Scandale > Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2013 5:39 AM > To:

Hola, tengo un script para usar la función POSIXct y lo corro en otras computadoras con otras versiones de R y no tengo problemas ahora cuando lo corro en mi maquina donde tengo la versión 3.1.3 no me da ningun error pero genera una nueva columna con NA puede ser sólo problema de la versión de R? gracias ana -- Ana Marina Srur Departamento de Dendrocronología e Historia Ambiental

Se ha borrado un adjunto en formato HTML... URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help-es/attachments/20200417/11369880/attachment.html>

Hola lista, tengo una base de datos muy grande de un datalogger. Consiste en un vector con 0's y 1's, y tengo que ver cuando hay 600 o más unos seguidos. Se me ocurrió hacerlo con un loop for. Pero tarda demasiado. También intente usar which para que seleccione solo los 1 para empezar a sumar pero no hay gran diferencia. A alguien se le ocurre alguna solución para hacerlo más rápido? Acá

Hi Alex, This has been very recently fixed by Hal. See http://reviews.llvm.org/rL270771 Adam > On Jun 4, 2016, at 3:13 AM, Alex Susu via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Hello. > Mikhail, I come back to this older thread. > I need to do a few changes to LoopVectorize.cpp. > > One of them is related to figuring out the exact C source line

On 08/08/2013 02:16 PM, Justin Holewinski wrote: > Why should SelectionDAGBuilder generate an explicit bitcast for a no-op > bitcast? The bitcast operation isn't just the reinterpretation (change in the semantic) of the bits without any change in the value of the bits itself? If the size and value do not change should be fine. > By definition, no bits are changed; so if the EVTs

...; doing parameter comment = test doing parameter read only = no doing parameter path = /tmp/xlsResults [2020/08/26 09:53:02.430626, 2, pid=2553, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0)] ../source3/param/loadparm.c:2685(lp_do_section) Processing section "[mailPDF]" doing parameter comment = Conversione in PDF: consegna via email doing parameter printing = bsd doing parameter path = /tmp doing parameter printable = yes doing parameter guest ok = no doing parameter print command = /opt/scripts/bin/sendPDF.sh %s %H %U "%J" %p %m %S [2020/08/26 09:53:02.430734, 2, pid=2553, effec...

Mandi! Rowland penny via samba In chel di` si favelave... > Even though your users may have the same username in AD as in the NT4-style > domain, they are different users, so a few thoughts. You have 'map to guest > = bad user', so I take it you must have 'guest ok = yes' set in the shares > (you haven't shown us the shares), so try changing 'bad user' to