search for: contunue

Rajesh M wrote: > i wish to improve the performance further by caching the logins. > current the same is kept disable because when user's change passwords > then they are not able to immediately login with the new password for > some time. How to solve this issue. Dovecot shouldn't be doing that. According to https://wiki2.dovecot.org/Authentication/Caching Data is

...do get the new contents. For users running Windows 7, they may well get the old contents as Windows 7 will cache recently accessed files and not re-transfer them if the date has not changed. I have tried touching the containing directory and touching the file to update the dates again, but the PCs contunue to see the old dates. If I delete the file and then copy it back in again then the PCs finally see the new file correctly. Am I correct in thinking that nmbd is sometimes caching old information and refusing to update it's view of things? Are there any settings that affect how nmbd may cache d...

Hi all. Is it possible to change DC administrator name from 'Administrator' to something else, for example, to 'DomaAdministr' ? If it is, is it possible via command-line or via LDAP browsers only ? If it do via LDAP browser (of course cn will be changed) , will Samba4 contunue to work correctly ? Also, I offer to add new switch to Samba4 DC provision such as 'adminname' , that is: Set DC Administrator name during provision, for example: ./samba-tool domain provision --host-name=Main --realm=dom.net --domain=Dom --host-ip=192.168.0.1 --adminname="MainDomAdm...

On Tue, May 10, 2016 3:57 pm, Liam O'Toole wrote: > On 2016-05-10, Valeri Galtsev > <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu> wrote: >> >> 1. Debian (and clones): you keep the components of the system pretty >> much on the level of latest release of each of components. Therefore >> "upgrade" to new release of the system is pretty close to just a >>

On Tue, May 10, 2016 2:19 am, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 05/10/2016 02:08 AM, Venkateswara Rao Dokku wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I would like to know whether the valid upgrade path will be present from >> CentOS 7 to future versions like we get for Ubuntu or some other >> operating >> systems. >> >> Right now, I am sure that we do not have proper update

On 2016-05-10, Valeri Galtsev <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu> wrote: > > 1. Debian (and clones): you keep the components of the system pretty > much on the level of latest release of each of components. Therefore > "upgrade" to new release of the system is pretty close to just a > regular routine update. You are describing Debian sid/unstable, which is contunuously

On 11/05/2016 8:12 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > On Tue, May 10, 2016 3:57 pm, Liam O'Toole wrote: >> On 2016-05-10, Valeri Galtsev >> <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu> wrote: >>> >>> 1. Debian (and clones): you keep the components of the system pretty >>> much on the level of latest release of each of components. Therefore >>>

> On Feb 14, 2017, at 5:50 PM, Joseph Tam <jtam.home at gmail.com> wrote: > > Another related security situation I've encountered is when a fraudster > has phished a user's password. A user/admin changes the password, > but forgets to invalidate dovecot's cached entry, allowing the fraudster > contunuing access to the mail account until the TTL expires or user

...7, they may well get the old contents as Windows 7 > > will cache recently accessed files and not re-transfer them if the date > > has not changed. > > > > I have tried touching the containing directory and touching the file to > > update the dates again, but the PCs contunue to see the old dates. If > > I delete the file and then copy it back in again then the PCs finally > > see the new file correctly. > > > > Am I correct in thinking that nmbd is sometimes caching old information > > and refusing to update it's view of things? Are t...

Ok, I've gone through the list archives, and there's a bunch of questions, but no answers. I'm referring to the Error: Network is busy when logging in from both Win95 (a and b versions) and Win98. It seems to never give this message unless the Windoze machine has been rebooted forcefully - it seems as if the samba server hasn't realized that the client has left, and is locking

On May 10, 2016, at 4:12 PM, Valeri Galtsev <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu> wrote: > > On Tue, May 10, 2016 3:57 pm, Liam O'Toole wrote: >> On 2016-05-10, Valeri Galtsev >> <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu> wrote: >>> >>> 1. Debian (and clones): you keep the components of the system pretty >>> much on the level of latest release of each of

.../05/18 18:21:31, 2] smbd/server.c:exit_server(406) Closing connections I have decided to post this message again in hopes that someone might have a clue as to what is going on. Since the original post, we have also tried Samba 2.0.4 on the production machine with the same result. Samba 2.0.3 contunues to run on the identically configured test system with no problems at all. <From last post...> I have done a great deal of reading regarding the network is busy error, but haven't come up with an answer for one particular problem. Here is the situation. Two identical DGUX machines are...

...assword) check_ntlm_password: Authentication for user [schulz] -> [schulz] FAILED with error NT_STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER [2015/02/11 15:53:38.527941, 2] ../auth/gensec/spnego.c:746(gensec_spnego_server_negTokenTarg) SPNEGO login failed: NT_STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER ----------------- Logging contunues with a different file name -------------- [2015/02/11 15:53:38.202215, 2] ../source3/smbd/sesssetup.c:551(setup_new_vc_session) setup_new_vc_session: New VC == 0, if NT4.x compatible we would close all old resources. [2015/02/11 15:53:38.207809, 2] ../source3/smbd/sesssetup.c:551(setup_new_vc_...

...k_ntlm_password: Authentication for user [schulz] -> [schulz] FAILED with error NT_STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER > [2015/02/11 15:53:38.527941, 2] ../auth/gensec/spnego.c:746(gensec_spnego_server_negTokenTarg) > SPNEGO login failed: NT_STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER > ----------------- Logging contunues with a different file name -------------- > [2015/02/11 15:53:38.202215, 2] ../source3/smbd/sesssetup.c:551(setup_new_vc_session) > setup_new_vc_session: New VC == 0, if NT4.x compatible we would close all old resources. > [2015/02/11 15:53:38.207809, 2] ../source3/smbd/sesssetup.c:55...

I have done a great deal of reading regarding the network is busy error, but haven't come up with an answer for one particular problem. Here is the situation. Two identical DGUX machines are sitting on a network. Both machines are running Samba 1.9.10 with no problems other than performance. Upon several recommendations about improving performance, they decided to upgrade to 2.0.3.