search for: controversi

I booted into X11 and have networking working and a kernel compile = running. SMP and PAE should be less than a day away. This completes = the proof of concept, I believe ;) I didn't cc LKML since I didn't want to spam them with graphics. Very = controversial graphics. Hopefully you appreciate the humor. Zach -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: parvirt-ops-success.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 125274 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/virtualization/attachment= s/2...

When one is doing simple regression and needs to force a zero intercept ( for whatever reason. I realize it's a controversial issue ), then subtracting the means of the left hand side and the right hand side from themselves does the trick. Does anyone know if there is a similar trick when the RHS has two variables ? Thanks. -------------------------------------------------------- This is not an offer (or solicitation...

HI, theres a lot of controversy related to this topic, my company is thinking on me to take the astricon bootcamp, but want to know if it is really whorty, 3000 USD is a huge amount of money to spend, plus the hotel, food and transportation, ive already deployed some asterisk?s pbx and have experience with it using analog tdm cards and E1/T1, queues, conference rooms, IVR, ACD, inbound and

...ption exists to give users the choice. Adding configuration option(s) for users who wish to bypass these checks could allow experienced users to do what they need to, and less experienced users could still benefit form the protection by default. Generally, giving users the choice should not be controversial, but I will note that there is the mild fear of a user googling the error and finding misguided advice to simply disable the check. Charlie

...fixed in r17039. As far as where changes are made? we have _releases_ for the purpose of providing stable code, though because the norm around here is to have a mostly working trunk I never would have committed a change which could reasonably have been expect to cause any real breakage. As far as controversial goes, I probably should have put it in scare quotes. The kind of controversial I'm talking about is the name of the function I added (I don't like _fill() much myself, but nothing better seemed obvious) or the decision to add a somewhat kludgey additional input function rather than break...

...------------------------------------------------ Lucio Chiappetti - IASF/CNR - via Bassini 15 - I-20133 Milano (Italy) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- L'Italia ripudia la guerra [...] come Italy repudiates war {...] as a mezzo di risoluzione delle controversie way of resolution of international internazionali controversies [Art. 11 Constitution of the Italian Republic] ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- For more info : http://www.mi.iasf.cnr.it/~lucio/personal.html ---...

...would be particularly appreciated as I would love to contribute this to libc++ when the time is right. Does the enclosed implementation implement this part of N3333: http://www.open-std.org/Jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2012/n3333.html#per.process.seed ? That to me seems like potentially the most controversial part. I scanned Hashing.h but did not immediately see that support (I could've easily missed it). Howard

...9;t build out of the box on Cygwin, because Cygwin defines uint32_t as "unsigned long" rather than "unsigned int". The attached patch allows me to build head of svn (rev 62510) on Cygwin using GCC 4. Can this be committed please? I realise that the DataTypes.h.in part might be controversial. Also, there's probably a better place to put it, but I'm not sure where. Thanks, Jay. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: cygwin.patch Type: application/octet-stream Size: 2939 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/piper...

...moving parts", complicated by the fact that it interacts with SELinux. And so on. So I'm kind of starting to hate it. But recently Freshmeat reminded me of DBMail: http://www.dbmail.org/ And today I noticed that DBMail uses Sieve. Very nice! Now, storing email in a database might be a controversial idea. I can definitely see at the same time some advantages, but also some disadvantages. However, for an IMAP server that essentially is used only by two people, I don't think the database per se can be a problem. So, what I'm asking is: Anybody here using DBMail? Any success storie...

I don't see any controversy for the preliminary requirement of removing BinaryOperator::isFNeg() and friends, so start with that? That work may reveal other potential regressions that we can patch in advance too. Other than that, I think there's really only a question of do we want 1 or both of fneg and fneg_constrained (and if we choose both, then I assume we'd also add

...condary issue as much of the code in LLVM already is excessively wrapped and, to my eyes, borderline unreadable. At the risk of starting a major thread that has surely been covered many times before: Is there a reason to still cling to the 80 column limit and not consider expanding it to a controversial 100 columns? Dominic

To avoid angry replies, let me first say that I know that the use of Type III sums of squares is controversial, and that some statisticians recommend instead that significance be judged using the non-marginal terms in the ANOVA. However, given that type III SS is also demanded by some… is there a function (equivalent to drop1 for lm) to obtain type III sums of squares for mixed models using the lme func...

...return 0 (and no output), and now returns 1 (and no output). Is the non-zero return code really helpful here? Much infrastructure will have to support the old API for the foreseeable future, and I'm not sure it's really an error condition for a host to not be in the known_hosts file. Less controversially, could the return values of ssh-keygen and their meanings be documented (and flagged when they change), please? Regards, Matthew [0] https://anongit.mindrot.org/openssh.git/commit/?id=660854859cad31d234edb9353fb7ca2780df8128

...fixes a typo in bitmath.h and adds FLAC__bitwriter_write_zeroes to the external declarations in bitwriter.c. - The Ogg patch replaces the check for FLAC_API_SUPPORTS_OGG_FLAC in stream_decoder.c with FLAC__HAS_OGG to fix compilation with Ogg support. The _lseeki64 patch probably is a little more controversial. The problem is that fseeki64 and ftelli64 are not available in Windows XP - at least not without installing extra MSVC runtime libraries. I changed compat.h and replaced them with calls to _lseeki64, which was available at least back to Windows 98 and thus doesn't impose such compatibili...

...t next to the llvm::IRBuilder, but it would soon introduce a dependence on other libraries (first TransformUtils) [2]. There are more things (especially parts of Clang) that could arguably be shared across frontends and therefore be moved into a such a dedicated location. If it turns out this is a controversial RFC, we will provide examples and reasons. I hope this is fairly straightforward as this does not introduce any drawbacks (I know of). Please let me know if you have an opinion on this. Thanks, Johannes [0] https://reviews.llvm.org/D69853 [1] https://reviews.llvm.org/D69785 [2] https://r...

Here''s a question for those well-versed in rforum or engines -- or both, ideally :) I''ve spent some time today turning RForum into an engine, using rails 1.0, engines trunk, and rforum 0.1 (as rforum trunk didn''t appear to work out of the box). My rforum engine works, but only when I do two things that I found by trial and error: 1) All rforum controllers subclass

...es, it would > be very useful. If you're just trying to *reduce* the endianness > assumptions that leak through, I don't think it's a good approach. > There is just no way to solve this problem with C. Yes, I can see that the llvm part of this is more straightforward and less controversial than the llvm-gcc part. Maybe I should submit the llvm part (since it applies to all source languages) and keep the llvm-gcc part as a local hack. > How do you propose to handle things like: > > struct foo { > #ifdef __LITTLE_ENDIAN__ > int x, y; > #else > int y, x; >...

Attached is a plot with a time series. If I have a time series object in R. How do I get the plot in the attached format of time axis?. When I issue plot(ts) I get a time series plot with tic only for years. -- with best regards Sudheer ********************************************************************************** Dr. Sudheer Joseph Scientist INDIAN NATIONAL CENTRE FOR OCEAN INFORMATION

On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 8:33 PM, James Molloy <james at jamesmolloy.co.uk> wrote: > But you're surely not suggesting that lld will segfault as an error > handling mode in production? > The document clearly states that (a) it is user's responsibility to give sane object files, and (b) a corrupted file may cause a fatal error or SEGV. > You say this was decided in a

If I am not mistaken, there are two things that are becoming clear: 1. For email, nobody seems to be against Discourse as long as the mailing lists are still a supported way to participate. So this seems non-controversial. 2. For IRC, people seem to be happy with switching to a more modern solution, but Discord is largely disliked by a significant portion of respondents. So perhaps we can focus the discussion on "if not Discord, what else?" Slack appears to be problematic due to lack of moderation capa...