search for: controlnod

Dear, I encountered some problems when I used the virsh to start my virtual machines. I had tried some ways but I still couldn't solve it. Please help me, thanks. error messages : virsh # start controlnode error: Failed to start domain controlnode error: internal error process exited while connecting to monitor: bind(unix:/var/lib/libvirt/qemu/controlnode.monitor): Permission denied chardev: opening backend "socket" failed -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scru...

...inputGraph now, lld models command line options, input files as > nodes in the InputGraph called InputElements. > > > > In the current approach, each InputElement is converted to a > LinkerInput, which works if all lld deals with individual files. > > > > Dealing with ControlNodes (Groups), have a problem with it, on how to > model that as a LinkerInput. > > > > Joerg/Me were chatting on the IRC about this and we came up with the > following approach. > > > > - LinkerInput will contain a single file(lld::File), if the node that > its pointi...

..., > > With the inputGraph now, lld models command line options, input files as > nodes in the InputGraph called InputElements. > > In the current approach, each InputElement is converted to a LinkerInput, > which works if all lld deals with individual files. > > Dealing with ControlNodes (Groups), have a problem with it, on how to > model that as a LinkerInput. > > Joerg/Me were chatting on the IRC about this and we came up with the > following approach. > > - LinkerInput will contain a single file(lld::File), if the node that its > pointing to appears to be...

...> Hi, > > With the inputGraph now, lld models command line options, input files as nodes in the InputGraph called InputElements. > > In the current approach, each InputElement is converted to a LinkerInput, which works if all lld deals with individual files. > > Dealing with ControlNodes (Groups), have a problem with it, on how to model that as a LinkerInput. > > Joerg/Me were chatting on the IRC about this and we came up with the following approach. > > - LinkerInput will contain a single file(lld::File), if the node that its pointing to appears to be a FileNode &g...

...command line options, input files as >>> nodes in the InputGraph called InputElements. >>> >>> In the current approach, each InputElement is converted to a LinkerInput, >>> which works if all lld deals with individual files. >>> >>> Dealing with ControlNodes (Groups), have a problem with it, on how to >>> model that as a LinkerInput. >>> >>> Joerg/Me were chatting on the IRC about this and we came up with the >>> following approach. >>> >>> - LinkerInput will contain a single file(lld::File), if t...

Hi, With the inputGraph now, lld models command line options, input files as nodes in the InputGraph called InputElements. In the current approach, each InputElement is converted to a LinkerInput, which works if all lld deals with individual files. Dealing with ControlNodes (Groups), have a problem with it, on how to model that as a LinkerInput. Joerg/Me were chatting on the IRC about this and we came up with the following approach. - LinkerInput will contain a single file(lld::File), if the node that its pointing to appears to be a FileNode - LinkerInput will...

...utGraph now, lld models command line options, input files as >> nodes in the InputGraph called InputElements. >> >> In the current approach, each InputElement is converted to a LinkerInput, >> which works if all lld deals with individual files. >> >> Dealing with ControlNodes (Groups), have a problem with it, on how to >> model that as a LinkerInput. >> >> Joerg/Me were chatting on the IRC about this and we came up with the >> following approach. >> >> - LinkerInput will contain a single file(lld::File), if the node that its >&gt...

...put files as >>>> nodes in the InputGraph called InputElements. >>>> >>>> In the current approach, each InputElement is converted to a LinkerInput, >>>> which works if all lld deals with individual files. >>>> >>>> Dealing with ControlNodes (Groups), have a problem with it, on how to >>>> model that as a LinkerInput. >>>> >>>> Joerg/Me were chatting on the IRC about this and we came up with the >>>> following approach. >>>> >>>> - LinkerInput will contain a sing...

...utGraph now, lld models command line options, input files as nodes in the InputGraph called InputElements. >>> >>> In the current approach, each InputElement is converted to a LinkerInput, which works if all lld deals with individual files. >>> >>> Dealing with ControlNodes (Groups), have a problem with it, on how to model that as a LinkerInput. >>> >>> Joerg/Me were chatting on the IRC about this and we came up with the following approach. >>> >>> - LinkerInput will contain a single file(lld::File), if the node that its pointin...

On 9/5/2013 1:40 PM, Nick Kledzik wrote: > The way darwin works with the current scheme is that the files are added to InputFiles in command line order, then forEachInitialAtom() walks the whole list but only operates on the non-library (i.e. object files) and searchLibraries() only operates on library files. > > If we have the Resolver walk the graph, then either: > 1) We need some

...;> With the inputGraph now, lld models command line options, input files as nodes in the InputGraph called InputElements. >> >> In the current approach, each InputElement is converted to a LinkerInput, which works if all lld deals with individual files. >> >> Dealing with ControlNodes (Groups), have a problem with it, on how to model that as a LinkerInput. >> >> Joerg/Me were chatting on the IRC about this and we came up with the following approach. >> >> - LinkerInput will contain a single file(lld::File), if the node that its pointing to appears to be...

...- getPath > > 2) The driver will process the vector of InputElements and call process on each of them. > process() would create a lld::File object within the InputElement if its a FileNode > process() would create a vector of lld::File objects within the InputElement if its a ControlNode > > 3) The resolver will not process each file but it would process InputElements and would do the following :- > 3.1 ) if the InputElement corresponds to a fileNode, the resolver will call in > inputElement->processAtoms(*this) and marks the InputElement as already...

On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 02:04:14PM -0700, Nick Kledzik wrote: > I do think we have too many classes. I thought InputGraph was going > to replace InputFiles. It seems link LinkerInput could be merged into > FileNode. I both agree and disagree. Logically we have two different views, the command line and the resulting input tree on the side and the groups of object files as seen by the

...ffer - getPath 2) The driver will process the vector of InputElements and call /*process */on each of them. process() would create a lld::File object within the InputElement if its a FileNode process() would create a vector of lld::File objects within the InputElement if its a ControlNode 3) The resolver will not process each file but it would process InputElements and would do the following :- 3.1 ) if the InputElement corresponds to a fileNode, the resolver will call in inputElement->processAtoms(*this) and marks the InputElement as already processed. *Th...

Shankar, I think your proposal and mine are pretty much the same. The difference is passing back info to the InputGraph as a parameter in nextFile() vs as a separate method call. My original draft email had a parameter in nextFile(), but it seemed a little confusing because the information was referring to the previous file. That is, if the current resolver state has newDefinedAtoms, that