search for: controller_as_a_file_server

...it supports only Windows ACL’s as per https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_a_Share_Using_POSIX_ACLs Also, as per below link, it is not recommended to use ADDC as file sharing service https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_Samba_as_an_Active_Directory_Domain_Controller#Using_the_Domain_Controller_as_a_File_Server So, we will not be using ADDC as file server. Can you please let us know if there is any other impact due to not supporting Windows/Extended ACL’s. Thanks, Silambarasan M On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 3:28 PM, Rowland Penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Fri, 3 Feb 201...

Hello, at the Moment we use and Samba 4 in NT4-style Domain with approx. 20 Clients. With the Problem of Windows 10 to join to NT4-style (https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Required_Settings_for_Samba_NT4_Domains#Windows_10:_There_Are_Currently_No_Logon_Servers_Available_to_Service_the_Logon_Request) we plan to migrate to Samba AD. At the Moment there is the following scheme: samba PDC

...mber or gidNumber attributes. > > Can I suggest you try reading the Samba wiki: > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Main_Page > > Paying attention to: > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_Samba_as_an_ > Active_Directory_Domain_Controller#Using_the_Domain_ > Controller_as_a_File_Server > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Shares_with_Windows_ACLs > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Implementing_roaming_profiles > > Rowland > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/opt...

I set up a samba ad dc (self compiled samba 4.5.1 on Ubuntu 16.04). If I connect to the server via \\smb.wie (its dns name) I can access netlogon and sysvol. If I connect via its IP then I can access all my shares (test as an example) - but either way I cannot connect to the other (I do see them though). Windows always tells me the login credentials would be wrong for the other one. This is my

I understand from the wiki that I shouldn't have the domain controller also be the file server. Is it possible to to setup the domain controller in a chroot and have the file server run under regular root? Would it be better to setup a VM for the domain controller and have file server run on the main OS or vice-versa? Regards, John

Hi i got a pdc with samba 4.5.1 with ldap backend for autentication The users can login into domain and everythings fine, after some days, the resources of the networks in this case the shares directory, can't be access by anyone, even them directory in common to everyone. i found this message with the same problem https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2014-March/179632.html and i applied

...ull_audit > > full_audit:failure = connect opendir disconnect unlink mkdir > > rmdir open rename > > I take it you haven't read this wiki page: > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_Samba_as_an_ > Active_Directory_Domain_Controller#Using_the_Domain_ > Controller_as_a_File_Server > > You cannot use POSIX ACLs on a Samba AD DC, so your share should be > something like this: > > [library] > comment = Library in common > path = /home/samba/shares/Library > read only = No > vfs objects = full_audit > full_audit:failure = connect...