Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "controlc".
Did you mean:
control
2004 Apr 02
1
[LLVMdev] Re: llvm -> array bound checking at compile time
Dear Boris,
I managed to see your question and rescue it from the llvm-announce
mailing list filter. I'm forwarding your question to the
llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu mailing list; that list is used for questions and
answers about LLVM.
For future reference, the llvm-announce list is used to send
announcements regarding LLVM releases. The llvmdev list is for general
discussion.
Now, on to
2011 Oct 20
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM Language Reference Strictness
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 2:37 AM, Shea Levy <shea at shealevy.com> wrote:
>. The
> (probably impossible) end-goals to this project would be a) that every
> program which passes its checks would be as safe to run in kernel mode
> with full memory access as it would be in user mode
That would be a very useful thing to have for embedded systems. Some
such as uCLinux run ports of
2011 Oct 20
4
[LLVMdev] LLVM Language Reference Strictness
On 10/19/11 11:58 PM, Eli Friedman wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 8:20 PM, Shea Levy<shea at shealevy.com> wrote:
>> 2. Are target-specific behaviors documented for each supported target?
> When anything has target-specific behavior, that fact should be
> documented. Beyond that, if you have a question about what some
> construct is supposed to do, please ask.
What I