Displaying 14 results from an estimated 14 matches for "control1".
Did you mean:
control
2012 Aug 23
3
Please help....normalization by the median of some control genes
...someone show me some code to do normalization by the median of some control genes for the example below?
Many Many Thanks in advance
This strategy selects a subset of genes (called ?control genes?) and makes the median of their data distribution similar across arrays.
??? ??? id1??? id2??? id3
control1??? 0.8??? 0.7??? 0.6
control2??? 0.6??? 0.2??? 0.4
probe1??? ??? 0.3??? 0.2??? 0.5
probe2??? ??? 0.4??? 0.9??? 0.7
probe3??? ??? 0.6??? 0.7??? 0.4
2011 Jul 19
3
How to get predicted values of y for different x values?
Here is my model with interaction terms and control variables (I changed
variables names for easy read):
reg1 <- lm(y ~ x1*x2*x3 +control1 + control2 + control3)
x1 ranges from 0 to 6; x2 from 0 to 5; and x3 from 0 to 4. All three are
discrete ordinal variables; but I will treat them as continuous variables.
(a) How can I see the predicted values of y for each of these scenarios (210
scenarios I guess)?
(b) How can I see the pred...
2007 Mar 28
0
geoRglm question with covariates
Hi All,
I'm trying to use the geoRglm package to run a poisson spatial glm
on a dataset with several covariates. When I run without covariates I
have no problems.
control1.data.geo <- mcmc.control(S.scale=0.2, thin = 1)
model1.data.geo <- list(cov.pars = c(1,1), beta=c(1), family="poisson")
test1.model1 <- glsm.mcmc(data.geo, model=model1.data.geo,
mcmc.input=control1.data.geo)
iter. numb. 1000 : Acc.-rate = 0.634
MCMC performed: n.iter. = 10...
2003 May 22
1
Experimental Design
...he only common group in
the two experiments are the controls. Is there any ANOVA design that
allows me to make this comparison taking into consideration the
confounding effect? Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Isaac
A representation of the experiments follows:
Experiment 1
Control1 Treat1 Treat2
Blk1 s1 s2 s3
Blk2 s4 s5 s6
Blk3 s7 s8 s9
Experiment 2
Control2 Treat3 Treat4
Blk1 s1a s2a s3a
Blk2 s4a s5a s6a
Blk3...
2016 Dec 14
0
Enabling scalarized conditional stores in the loop vectorizer
...ation kicking in unless -force-vector-width=<> is specified. Let me know if I am missing something.
-Thx
struct nodeTy
{
unsigned int c1;
unsigned int c2;
unsigned int state;
};
struct quantum_reg
{
struct nodeTy node[32];
unsigned int size;
};
void
quantum_toffoli(int control1, int control2, int target, struct quantum_reg *reg, int n)
{
int i;
int N = reg->size;
for(i=0; i < N; i++)
{
if(reg->node[i].state & ((unsigned int)1 << control1))
if(reg->node[i].state & ((unsigned int)1 << control2))...
2012 Sep 04
1
binary data
Dear list,
Hello to everybody, I´m interested in finding a package for statistical analysis of binary data, I have a matrix with the following structure:
Case1 Case2 Case 3 ....... CaseX Control1 Control2 Control3 ....... ControlY
Pep1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1
Pep2 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1
Pep3 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1
...
Pepz 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1
I would like to know some R package to calculte similarity matrix or to make some statistical diferences between cases and controls
Any help it would be very appreciate...
2017 Dec 02
0
How can you find the optimal number of values to randomly sample to optimize random forest classification without trial and error?
I have data set up like the following:
control1 <- sample(1:75, 3947398, replace=TRUE)
control2 <- sample(1:75, 28793, replace=TRUE)
control3 <- sample(1:100, 392733, replace=TRUE)
control4 <- sample(1:75, 858383, replace=TRUE)
patient1 <- sample(1:100, 28048, replace=TRUE)
patient2 <- sample(1:50, 80400, replace=TRUE)
patient3...
2016 Dec 14
2
Enabling scalarized conditional stores in the loop vectorizer
...>
> unsigned int c1;
>
> unsigned int c2;
>
> unsigned int state;
>
> };
>
>
>
> struct quantum_reg
>
> {
>
> struct nodeTy node[32];
>
> unsigned int size;
>
> };
>
>
>
> void
>
> quantum_toffoli(int control1, int control2, int target, struct quantum_reg
> *reg, int n)
>
> {
>
> int i;
>
>
>
> int N = reg->size;
>
> for(i=0; i < N; i++)
>
> {
>
> if(reg->node[i].state & ((unsigned int)1 << control1))
>
>...
2016 Dec 14
4
Enabling scalarized conditional stores in the loop vectorizer
...>
> unsigned int c1;
>
> unsigned int c2;
>
> unsigned int state;
>
> };
>
>
>
> struct quantum_reg
>
> {
>
> struct nodeTy node[32];
>
> unsigned int size;
>
> };
>
>
>
> void
>
> quantum_toffoli(int control1, int control2, int target, struct quantum_reg
> *reg, int n)
>
> {
>
> int i;
>
>
>
> int N = reg->size;
>
> for(i=0; i < N; i++)
>
> {
>
> if(reg->node[i].state & ((unsigned int)1 << control1))
>
>...
2016 Dec 14
0
Enabling scalarized conditional stores in the loop vectorizer
...ation kicking in unless -force-vector-width=<> is specified. Let me know if I am missing something.
-Thx
struct nodeTy
{
unsigned int c1;
unsigned int c2;
unsigned int state;
};
struct quantum_reg
{
struct nodeTy node[32];
unsigned int size;
};
void
quantum_toffoli(int control1, int control2, int target, struct quantum_reg *reg, int n)
{
int i;
int N = reg->size;
for(i=0; i < N; i++)
{
if(reg->node[i].state & ((unsigned int)1 << control1))
if(reg->node[i].state & ((unsigned int)1 << control2))...
2016 Dec 15
0
Enabling scalarized conditional stores in the loop vectorizer
...igned int state;
>>
>> };
>>
>>
>>
>> struct quantum_reg
>>
>> {
>>
>> struct nodeTy node[32];
>>
>> unsigned int size;
>>
>> };
>>
>>
>>
>> void
>>
>> quantum_toffoli(int control1, int control2, int target, struct
>> quantum_reg *reg, int n)
>>
>> {
>>
>> int i;
>>
>>
>>
>> int N = reg->size;
>>
>> for(i=0; i < N; i++)
>>
>> {
>>
>> if(reg->node[i]....
2016 Dec 15
0
Enabling scalarized conditional stores in the loop vectorizer
...ation kicking in unless -force-vector-width=<> is specified. Let me know if I am missing something.
-Thx
struct nodeTy
{
unsigned int c1;
unsigned int c2;
unsigned int state;
};
struct quantum_reg
{
struct nodeTy node[32];
unsigned int size;
};
void
quantum_toffoli(int control1, int control2, int target, struct quantum_reg *reg, int n)
{
int i;
int N = reg->size;
for(i=0; i < N; i++)
{
if(reg->node[i].state & ((unsigned int)1 << control1))
if(reg->node[i].state & ((unsigned int)1 << control2))...
2016 Dec 13
4
Enabling scalarized conditional stores in the loop vectorizer
Hi Michael,
Thanks for testing this on your benchmarks and target. I think the results
will help guide the direction we go. I tested the feature with spec2k/2k6
on AArch64/Kryo and saw minor performance swings, aside from a large (30%)
improvement in spec2k6/libquantum. The primary loop in that benchmark has a
conditional store, so I expected it to benefit.
Regarding the cost model, I think the
2013 Feb 27
4
GlusterFS performance
...itching direct-io on and off doesn't have effect.
Playing with glusterfs options too.
What I can do with performance?
My volumes:
Volume Name: nginx
Type: Replicate
Volume ID: e3306431-e01d-41f8-8b2d-86a61837b0b2
Status: Started
Number of Bricks: 1 x 2 = 2
Transport-type: tcp
Bricks:
Brick1: control1:/storage/nginx
Brick2: control2:/storage/nginx
Volume Name: instances
Type: Distributed-Replicate
Volume ID: d32363fc-4b53-433c-87b7-ad51acfa4125
Status: Started
Number of Bricks: 2 x 2 = 4
Transport-type: tcp
Bricks:
Brick1: control1:/storage/instances
Brick2: control2:/storage/instances
Brick3:...