Displaying 20 results from an estimated 11187 matches for "contributers".
2019 Nov 22
3
[RFC] Let's add a CONTRIBUTING.md file to llvm-project
Hi,
With multiple proposals to improve the situation for newcomers in flight, let me add another brief proposal:
Let’s add a CONTRIBUTING.md file to the top-level directory of llvm-project.
I think this would make the information about how to contribute more visible and Github uses CONTRIBUTING.md to display ‘Contributing Guidelines’ at a few places, like when creating new issues or pull
2006 Feb 16
2
simple association question
I have two models, Donor and Contribution, and have has_many and
belongs_to set respectively.
My question is regarding creation of associated objects. I''ll let the
code speak:
me = Donor.find(1)
contribution = me.contributions.create do |e|
e.amount = 164.00
e.category = Category.find(1)
end
I thought this was valid, but it doesn''t work properly - it appears to
2006 Apr 09
4
Inheritance via Though Associations?
I posted something about this a week ago wihtout response, but have made some
progress since. However, I''m still not getting exactly what I want.
OK, three core tables:
create_table :reference_items do |t|
t.column :title, :string, :limit => 255
t.column :year, :integer, :limit => 4
t.column :type, :string
t.column
2015 Oct 21
2
RFC: Improving license & patent issues in the LLVM community
>
>
> > Again, as stated before, both of these issues are covered by the apache
> license.
> >
> > It has a built-in CLA that explicitly grants both copyright and patent
> > rights from contributors when they make contributions to the work.
>
> Huh? How can employee X of company Y contributing a patch grant any
> patent rights on behalf of Y?
>
>
2009 Jan 19
1
Question about contributed packages
I am working on a methodology for qualifying R, for GLP and GCP.
If I quailfy only the base R install, with no contributed packages, it
seems relatively simple to qualify R. However, from time to time I
will want to use a contributed package. If I use a contributed package,
does it leave anything behind that will be loaded with the next invocation
of R?
Suppose I run R and use a contributed
2009 Sep 30
3
New User Wishes to Contribute
As requested on http://wiki.centos.org/Contribute, here is my info:
# your FirstnameLastname username [SteveBonds]
# the proposed subject of your Wiki contribution(s) [Personal Page]
# the proposed location of your Wiki contribution(s) [Personal Page]
I'll branch out from here. Maybe. While I understand the problem
with spammers, asking each user to send each proposed page to the list
for
2014 Dec 19
2
Contribute to the Wiki
Hello Akemi,
I want to give support to CentOs user with any kind of issue, hence please
suggest me what should I do for that. And also one thing I am new here so
can suggest me the workflow.
Gajanan
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 12:43 AM, Akemi Yagi <amyagi at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 3:49 AM, Gajanan Kankal <grkankal at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>>
2018 Jun 21
2
Contribute - request
Hi, i would like to contribute to the WiKi. Lots of the articles are
outdated...
*Username: LucianMaly*
*Proposed subject of my contribution(s): for
example https://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Skype
<https://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Skype> and
https://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/OS_Protection
<https://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/OS_Protection> plus some others*
*Proposed location of my
2011 Oct 12
1
Contributing to Samba: Samba now accepts corporate copyright.
Here is a change we're instituting immediately to make it easier
for corporations to contribute code changes to Samba whilst still
retaining copyright ownership of the contributed code.
Feel free to ask any questions on the samba-technical at samba.org
list.
We'd like to thank our lawyers at the Software Freedom Law Center
for helping us to make this change.
Regards,
The Samba Team.
2011 Oct 12
1
Contributing to Samba: Samba now accepts corporate copyright.
Here is a change we're instituting immediately to make it easier
for corporations to contribute code changes to Samba whilst still
retaining copyright ownership of the contributed code.
Feel free to ask any questions on the samba-technical at samba.org
list.
We'd like to thank our lawyers at the Software Freedom Law Center
for helping us to make this change.
Regards,
The Samba Team.
2015 Jul 09
4
Contributing to the CentOS wiki
Hello all,
I'd like to contribute to the CentOS wiki. Per these docs[0], I
should email this list with the following information.
Username: DanielFarrell
Contribution subject: Update CBS Koji Poodle patch docs
Contribution location: http://goo.gl/7Oe9QO (CBS HOWTO#Quickstart)
I'd like to make the docs related to patching Koji for the Poodle
exploit[1] generally more clear. For example,
2017 Jul 06
2
[DWARFv5] Reading the .debug_str_offsets section
Yep, Wolfgang picked up on the one thing I saw too.
This is why I like having people review my stuff.
I think it's a bit of a pity that str_offsets_base can point into the middle of a str_offsets contribution in some ways
Actually I changed my mind after saying that in the review, and in this writeup I concluded that it cannot do that. str_offsets_base points to the element immediately
1998 Oct 15
1
Problem to map home dir
> Sorry, but in the first mail I forgot to attach the Makefile and I
> forgot also to mention that I already tried the password handling in win95
> via the registry.
>
> De Boe Bart wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I need to install Samba on a HP J210 HPUX 10.20.
> > I downloaded and compiled version 1.9.18p10.
> >
> > Following problems are
2014 Dec 22
2
Contribute to the Wiki
Hello Akemi,
I have gone through your mail and provided link and this is my contribution
details
- the proposed subject of your Wiki contribution(s) :- Provide
technical support to CentOS user
- the proposed location of your Wiki contribution(s) :- Pune (India)
Thanks & Regards,
Gajanan Kankal
On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 11:50 AM, Akemi Yagi <amyagi at gmail.com> wrote:
>
2008 Nov 05
1
Structure for Contribution Pages
Hi Guys,
While updating es/ pages, noted that actually there are two Contribute
pages. One in Contribute and other in HowToContribute.
I wonder if we could reorganize that a bit. Maybe separate
contribution needs by SIGs. Then create a Contribution index page
where all those SIG's contribution pages be linked from ? It may be
needed to create some SIGs in those areas where they don't
2013 Jan 08
0
New Trivial Patch Exemption Policy for open source contributions
I wanted to make sure that everyone was aware of a slight change we''ve
made to the process for open source contributions. For *trivial*
contributions, we are no longer requiring a Contributor License
Agreement (CLA). Note that for most contributions a CLA signature is
still required. I''m also working on making the overall CLA process
easier, but that will take a little more time
2014 Nov 19
14
[LLVMdev] Proposal: add Go frontend subproject based on llgo
Hi all,
I'd like to propose the contribution of a Go frontend subproject to the LLVM
project, based on the existing llgo project at https://github.com/go-llvm/llgo .
As with the previous contribution of the Go bindings, I have obtained
permission from all llgo contributors whose code is part of this contribution,
to contribute their changes to the LLVM project and relicense their changes
2020 May 25
2
requesting edit/create page rights for wiki.centos.org/contribute
Howdy,
as you already know from my intro email, I'm working on CentOS Stream.
I'd love to start publishing docs to wiki and therefore need edit
access for the wiki.centos.org/contribute tree: could you grant it to
me, please?
My plan is to create a new document for it:
wiki.centos.org/contribute/CentOSStream and then link to it from the
contribute document - does that sound right?
2017 Aug 10
2
Relicensing: Revised Developer Policy
Hi Rafael,
We’ve discussed why a license change is preferable over the span of several years now. I’m happy to explain over the phone, contact me off list and we can talk.
-Chris
> On Aug 10, 2017, at 8:33 AM, Rafael Avila de Espindola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I still don't see any justification in the text why a license change is
>
2017 Aug 10
2
Relicensing: Revised Developer Policy
This has already been discussed extensively in the public. The threads are available in the archives.
-Chris
> On Aug 10, 2017, at 1:05 PM, Rafael Avila de Espindola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Sorry, but I really don't think a private conversation is appropriate
> for such discussions.
>
> If the motive cannot be explained in public I have no choice