search for: contradict

...me here? VR256:v32i8:$src MD0.VMOVDQA_256mr: (st:isVoid VR256:v32i8:$src, addr:iPTR: $dst)<<P:Predicate_unindexedstore>><<P:Predicate_store>><<P:Predicate_alignedstore>> /ptmp/dag/universal_build/debug/DEFAULT/llvm/tblgen: In MD0.VMOVDQA_256mr: Type inference contradiction found in node! I don't see any type contradiction. -Dave

man_in_shack banned me during a casual conversation where i was explaining my dual x server wine setup, saying I was contradicting myself. I obviously wasn't trying to contradict myself, if I did, and I don't see how this is ban-worthy under any circumstance.

Hi, I'm reading the tinc documentation [1], chapter 4 Configuration. I notice an apparent contradiction, and I wonder which part is correct. [1] http://tinc-vpn.org/documentation/tinc_4.html In part 4.3 "How connections work" this is stated: "If it [tinc] sees one or more ?ConnectTo? values pointing to other tinc daemons in that file, it will try to connect to those other daemons...

...st_subfolder". 3) on that subfolder , from the windows security tab I could add user "user1" and can give read and write access to that. How to prevent this ??. Actually on the share "test" user1 has read only access .How samba code is allowing to change permissions that contradict user security settings. 4) when I login to share "test" with "user1" , I cannot write into subfolder "test_subfolder" This is smb.conf for "test" share part .. ------- [test] path= /mnt/samba/shares/SP0/test/ max connections= 50 max connections= 250 directo...

...:128 followed by f80:32:32. This is an output from clang on Windows (clang -m32 -emit-llvm). Triple is i686-pc-win32. Documentation doesn't specify the interpretation of such cases. So I have two questions: 1. What interpretations should be? 2. Should it be clearly specified in documentation if contradicting information is allowed and how it should be interpreted? -Dmitry -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130415/22f61396/attachment.html>

Hi, I have found some contradictions in the samba documentation. i am writing them down here so if you can please verify them. in heading 4.3.3 of the documentation it says " When samba is operating in security = domain mode , the samba server has a domain security trust account ( a machine account) and causes all auth...

Hi Herve, I think you are confusing subclasses and classes. There is no contradiction. `is` documentation is very clear: `With one argument, returns all the super-classes of this object's class.` Note that object class is always `data.frame` here, check: > class(data.frame()) [1] "data.frame" > is(data.frame(), "data.frame") [1] TRUE Best, Mehmet...

Hello Folks, There seems to be contradicting sentences in the release notes for 4.11.0RC1: Default schema updated to 2012_R2 --------------------------------- Default AD schema changed from 2008_R2 to 2012_R2. 2012_R2 functional level is not yet available. Older schemas can be used by provisioning with the '--base-schema' argum...

...entirely sure. Best, -Mehmet On 29 November 2017 at 20:46, Herv? Pag?s <hpages at fredhutch.org> wrote: > Hi Mehmet, > > On 11/29/2017 11:22 AM, Suzen, Mehmet wrote: >> >> Hi Herve, >> >> I think you are confusing subclasses and classes. There is no >> contradiction. `is` documentation >> is very clear: >> >> `With one argument, returns all the super-classes of this object's class.` > > > Yes that's indeed very clear. So if "list" is a super-class > of "data.frame" (as reported by is(data.frame())),...

Hi, The unary forms of is() and extends() report that data.frame extends list, oldClass, and vector: > is(data.frame()) [1] "data.frame" "list" "oldClass" "vector" > extends("data.frame") [1] "data.frame" "list" "oldClass" "vector" However, the binary form of is()

2017-11-30 3:14 GMT+01:00 Suzen, Mehmet <mehmet.suzen at gmail.com>: > My understanding is that there is no inconsistency. `is` does what it > claims, from the documentation: > > ?is?: With two arguments, tests whether ?object? can be treated as > from ?class2?. > > With one argument, returns all the super-classes of this > object's

2017-11-30 13:26 GMT+01:00 Suzen, Mehmet <mehmet.suzen at gmail.com>: > On 30 November 2017 at 11:37, I?aki ?car <i.ucar86 at gmail.com> wrote: >> 2017-11-30 3:14 GMT+01:00 Suzen, Mehmet <mehmet.suzen at gmail.com>: >>> My understanding is that there is no inconsistency. `is` does what it >>> claims, from the documentation: >>> >>>

2017-11-30 15:54 GMT+01:00 Suzen, Mehmet <mehmet.suzen at gmail.com>: > > > On 30 Nov 2017 14:32, "I?aki ?car" <i.ucar86 at gmail.com> wrote: > >>> >>> Am I supposed to read every reference on a man page just to know what >>> to expect from a function? >>> >> >> If the reference is from John Chamber, you are supposed

Yes, data.frame is not an S4 class but is(data.frame()) finds its super-classes anyway and without the need to wrap it in asS4(). And "list' is one of the super-classes. Then is(data.frame(), "list") contradicts this. I'm not asking for a workaround. I already have one with 'class2 %in% is(object)' as reported in my original post. 'is(asS4(object), class2)' is maybe another one but, unlike the former, it's not obvious that it will behave consistently with unary is(). There could b...

> > And indeed I think you are right on spot and this would mean > > that indeed the implicit class > > "matrix" should rather become c("matrix", "array"). > > I've made up my mind (and not been contradicted by my fellow R > corers) to try go there for R 4.0.0 next April. I'm not enthusiastic about matrices extending arrays. If a matrix is an array, then shouldn't all vectors in R, be arrays too? > #mockup > class (1) [1] "numeric" "array" Which is a bad ide...

Hi Mehmet, On 11/29/2017 11:22 AM, Suzen, Mehmet wrote: > Hi Herve, > > I think you are confusing subclasses and classes. There is no > contradiction. `is` documentation > is very clear: > > `With one argument, returns all the super-classes of this object's class.` Yes that's indeed very clear. So if "list" is a super-class of "data.frame" (as reported by is(data.frame())), then is(data.frame(), "lis...

...s that the sign of a zero result isn't significant." > > I'll revise my description to also mention that the sign of a zero result > isn't significant. > Ok, I see what you're saying here now. > > Also, even when you do have the second sentence, it seems to contradict > the first sentence. > > > Why does it contradict the first sentence? I meant it as a clarification > or reinforcement of the first, not a contradiction. > Suppose I'm writing a backend for a target which has an instruction that traps on any kind of NaN. Assuming I care abou...

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1582 ------- Additional Comments From wayned@samba.org 2004-08-05 11:21 ------- Created an attachment (id=594) --> (https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=594&action=view) Fix problem with --dry-run (-n) This patch avoids a fatal error when using --dry-run and the destination directory does not exist on the receiver. -- Configure

Sorry, the use of rows/columns I found so far was rather contradictive, both refering to what can be gotten via subset() instead of what I'm looking for. Is there a way to get multiple colums/rows? Something like corpus.df${mph,mgl,eng} Thanks in advance for any answers. -- Joel Prokopchuk

...n a Poisson distribution the Maximum Likelihood estimator of the mean parameter lambda is the sample mean, so if we calculate the sample mean of that generated Poisson distribution manually using R we get the below!* > sample.mean<- sum(x*y)/sum(y) > sample.mean [1] 3.5433 *This is the contradiction!! * Here I am getting the estimate as 3.5433(which is reasonable as most of the values are clustered around 3), but mle code gives the estimate 11.545(which may not be correct as this is out side the range 0:10) Why this contradiction? -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabbl...