Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "container_reference_wrapp".
Did you mean:
container_reference_wrapper
2008 Feb 29
2
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] REPOST: Scheduler Fix
I'm reposting this patch at the request of Evan. It fixes a problem with
std::priority_queue and _GLIBCXX_DEBUG.
-Dave
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: schedule_dag.diff
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 7731 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
2008 Feb 29
0
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] REPOST: Scheduler Fix
It's not building:
usr/include/c++/4.0.0/bits/stl_queue.h: In member function 'void
std::priority_queue<_Tp, _Sequence, _Compare>::push(const typename
_Sequence::value_type&) [with _Tp = llvm::SUnit*, _Sequence = ll\
vm::container_reference_wrapper<std::vector<llvm::SUnit*,
std::allocator<llvm::SUnit*> > >, _Compare = <unnamed>::td_ls_rr_sort]':
ScheduleDAGRRList.cpp:1057: instantiated from
'void<unnamed>::RegReductionPriorityQueue<SF>::push(llvm::SUnit*)
[with SF = <unnamed>::td_ls_...
2007 Dec 17
2
[LLVMdev] RFC: GLIBCXX_DEBUG ScheduleDAG Patch
...calls updateNode which does a std::make_heap on the underlying SUnitVec.
This restores the correct ordering.
I believe this should also make the scheduler run more like it is supposed to.
Previously, the priority queue ordering was incorrect so we weren't necessarly
scheduling correctly.
The container_reference_wrapper part may be controversial. So I want to
get some opinions on this before I submit it.
Thanks.
-Dave
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ScheduleDAG.patch
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 7731 bytes
Desc: not avai...
2007 Dec 17
0
[LLVMdev] RFC: GLIBCXX_DEBUG ScheduleDAG Patch
...nderlying
> SUnitVec.
> This restores the correct ordering.
>
> I believe this should also make the scheduler run more like it is
> supposed to.
> Previously, the priority queue ordering was incorrect so we weren't
> necessarly
> scheduling correctly.
>
> The container_reference_wrapper part may be controversial. So I
> want to
> get some opinions on this before I submit it.
>
> Thanks.
>
> -Dave
> <ScheduleDAG.patch>_______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMd...