Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "cont41".
Did you mean:
cont4
2014 Nov 06
2
[LLVMdev] Should the MachineVerifier accept a MBB with a single (landing pad) successor?
...he verifier is wrong and should
accept it. Skip the description for the proposed change.
On AArch64, the verifier complains with:
*** Bad machine code: MBB exits via unconditional branch but
doesn't have exactly one CFG successor! ***
- function: t4
- basic block: BB#5 invoke.cont41
The freshly selected relevant blocks are:
BB#7: derived from LLVM BB %invoke.cont41
EH_LABEL <MCSym=Ltmp4>
B <BB#8>
Successors according to CFG: BB#8(1) BB#9(1)
BB#8: derived from LLVM BB %invoke.cont43
Predecessors according to CFG: BB...