search for: cont'd

After a brief stint offlist (thanks Bradley), I'm closer to getting SMB/LDAP working but now am encountering something very odd, which he suggested I bring back to the list for "further evaluation". :-) > $ smbclient //TESTBOX/testshare -U dballing > added interface ip=10.15.49.142 bcast=10.15.49.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 > Password: > session setup failed:

Hi, Some time ago I reported a problem with Dolphin on bugs.centos.org. When extracting an archive, the new files don't appear, and I have to press F5 to refresh the current directory display. I just found out a specificity of this bug. This only seem to happen on those installations where I run the 4.4.x kernel (kernel-lt package from elrepo-kernel repository). Any idea how I could solve

>I am trying to compile R-0.65 on a Sparc 20. I have gcc 2.7.2.2 and I >have SC4.0. I used gcc to compile R-0.64.2 in July with no problems. >Now when I run configure for R-0.65 I get the following message: > >>checking whether the C compiler (gcc ) works... no >>configure: error: installation or configuration problem: C compiler cannot create executables. > >and

Chris Cappuccio wrote: > So I just got one like this before a login: > > May 16 21:24:58 m1 dovecot: imap-login: Unrecognized event: kevent {.ident = 0, .filter = 0xffffffff, .flags = 0x0001, .fflags = 0x00000000, .data = 0x0000002b} > May 16 21:24:58 m1 dovecot: imap-login: mode: 0x004x > May 16 21:24:58 m1 dovecot: child 10716 (login) killed with signal 6 > > The OpenBSD

Thank you Paul for your response. Perhaps I can give a bit more info: RS/6000 H50 w/AIX 4.3.2 running Samba 2.0.5a PIII-450 NT4sp4 w/128MB I indicated yesterday that a race condition appeared to be happening. I later remembered that I turned on level2 oplocks on two read only shares as the last tunings we did before this began to happen. I got the info from the Speed.txt document in hopes of

Hi, What i said above is not true, i didn't realize that the reason the route disappeared was caused by a script that restarts tinc (and also resets the tap device), not by tinc itself. I compiled and installed tinc 0.3 today. It seems to work ok, even on a very slow 486 that caused to crash earlier tinc version. -- Hans Bayle - Tinc: Discussion list about the tinc VPN daemon

Hi Alexandre, Am Montag, den 24.03.2014, 17:42 +0900 schrieb Alexandre Courbot: > Hi everyone, [...] > > A few lines of hacks (not included here) are still needed to deal with cached > mappings triggering external aborts and CPU/GPU memory coherency issues, but I > hope to understand and address these issues next. For the coherency issue part you may want to look at my Nouveau on

On Mon, 14 Apr 2008, Jon Sargeant wrote: > Ugh, this isn't what I wanted to hear. Passing "complex" differently > than a structure containing two doubles is a bad design, but alas, > calling conventions are beyond our control. How many special cases like > this are there? If "complex" is the only special case, LLVM could There are a huge number of special cases. Take a look at the craziness in the x86-64 ABI st...

> > entirely in the back end. Apart from calling conventions, the front end > > doesn't need to know the specific target, only the data layout and which > > intrinsics the target supports. This approach makes a clean division > > between the front end and back end. > > If you want to map from a C type/calling convetion to LLVM IR, clang is a > good way to

...stack. I know this is painful, hopefully LLVM will get some helpers for this one day. The reason is that some ABIs make distinctions that don't exist at the LLVM level. For example at least one ABI says that "complex" ( { double, double } ) should be passed differently to a struct containing a pair of doubles. > It looks like I replace each > struct/array parameter with a 'byval' pointer parameter, and I replace a > result struct/array with an 'sret' pointer parameter. No, it's not so easy, sorry. > The reason I ask > is that each callin...

...it won't do sed. Basically I want to find all files with a string (except binary) and change it. let STR be the string I am looking for. NEW is new string. I am doing TFIL=/usr/tmp/dummy$$.txt find . -type f | while read fil do grep "$STR" $fil > $TFIL [ $? -eq 0 ] || continue ## does not match if [ "$(cat $TFIL)" = "Binary file $fil matches" ] then continue # Don't operate on binary files fi sed -i "s/$STR/$NEW/g" $fil done (I will have to do something with sed in case there is "/"...

On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 5:19 PM, Alexandre Courbot <acourbot at nvidia.com> wrote: > Changes since v2: > - Enabled software class > - Removed unneeded changes to nouveau_accel_init() > - Replaced use of architecture-private pfn_to_dma() and dma_to_pfn() with > the portable page_to_phys()/phys_to_page() page_to_phys() looks well defined and used everywhere, phys_to_page() not

Hi Alexandre, Am Mittwoch, den 26.03.2014, 15:33 +0900 schrieb Alexandre Courbot: > Hi Lucas, > > On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 10:19 PM, Lucas Stach <l.stach at pengutronix.de> wrote: > > Hi Alexandre, > > > > Am Montag, den 24.03.2014, 17:42 +0900 schrieb Alexandre Courbot: > >> Hi everyone, > > [...] > >> > >> A few lines of hacks

Here's the state of my search: BatteriesPlus is... odd. The corporate site, and after a phone call, tell me they don't do GSA, but some of their franchises do. I called the local one, and they do. However, the only RBC 43 they offer, I might as well buy direct from APC, at well over $300 for the set. Battery Sharks, and Apex, don't do GSA... but they *do* offer replacements for about

What is the correct procedure for translating a function signature from a high-order language to LLVM? It looks like I replace each struct/array parameter with a 'byval' pointer parameter, and I replace a result struct/array with an 'sret' pointer parameter. The reason I ask is that each calling convention has subtle variations for each architecture and platform. For

...this is painful, hopefully LLVM will get some helpers for this one > day. The reason is that some ABIs make distinctions that don't exist at > the LLVM level. For example at least one ABI says that "complex" > ( { double, double } ) should be passed differently to a struct containing > a pair of doubles. Ugh, this isn't what I wanted to hear. Passing "complex" differently than a structure containing two doubles is a bad design, but alas, calling conventions are beyond our control. How many special cases like this are there? If "complex" i...

This continues the message "data.frame within a function (PR#9294)" that was posted on 2006/10/12. Duncan Murdoch kindly replied. I'm using the current version R 2.4.0, but the same issue exists. Just copy and paste the following code under R, and compare the output of f1() and f2() and the...

...cs that come with samba, like brwosing.txt, browsing-config.txt, etc. They may help you out as well. Jim > -----Original Message----- > From: James W. Beauchamp [mailto:jbeauchamp@gesinc.com] > Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 1:32 PM > To: vansickj-eodc@Kaman.com > Subject: Browsing cont'd > > > Jim: > Thanks again. My problem is there aren't two samba boxes :( > . Just the one > on one end of the link. There is only a peer-to-peer setup > on the other > end. I'll try the host file setup since it is so few > machines and see if >...

Hi Lucas, On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 10:19 PM, Lucas Stach <l.stach at pengutronix.de> wrote: > Hi Alexandre, > > Am Montag, den 24.03.2014, 17:42 +0900 schrieb Alexandre Courbot: >> Hi everyone, > [...] >> >> A few lines of hacks (not included here) are still needed to deal with cached >> mappings triggering external aborts and CPU/GPU memory coherency

I have undertaken a small project of writing a Vorbis decoder completely from the spec, with the goal of catching any errors, both typographically and algorithmically, in the spec. My "reference" decoder is also being written in an extremely methodical style, with practically no algorithmic optimization, such that it will be clear that every step has been copied exactly from the spec.