Displaying 16 results from an estimated 16 matches for "constructordestructorattribut".
Did you mean:
constructordestructorattributes
2014 May 04
12
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Benchmarking subset of the test suite
...liasesReturn
SingleSource/Regression/C++/2011-03-28-Bitfield
SingleSource/Regression/C/badidx
SingleSource/Regression/C/bigstack
SingleSource/Regression/C++/BuiltinTypeInfo
SingleSource/Regression/C/callargs
SingleSource/Regression/C/casts
SingleSource/Regression/C/compare
SingleSource/Regression/C/ConstructorDestructorAttributes
SingleSource/Regression/C/DuffsDevice
SingleSource/Regression/C++/EH/class_hierarchy
SingleSource/Regression/C++/EH/ConditionalExpr
SingleSource/Regression/C++/EH/ctor_dtor_count
SingleSource/Regression/C++/EH/ctor_dtor_count-2
SingleSource/Regression/C++/EH/dead_try_block
SingleSource/Regression...
2003 Jun 26
1
[LLVMdev] Core LLVM status update
...ns which are executed before "main" is called.
Static destructors are run after the program exits. This facility is
used by C++ frontend to run ctors/dtors of objects declared at global
scope, but can also be used by C programs (for an example, see
test/Regression/C++Frontend/ConstructorDestructorAttributes.c).
This is now supported by all backends, and recently I checked in some
optimizer improvements which allow all of the support overhead to be
dead code eliminated from programs which don't use the facilities (ie,
most C programs). This also means that the mysterious "__mai...
2012 Feb 19
2
[LLVMdev] Problem While Running Test Suite
...ngleSource/Regression/C/2005-05-06-LongLongSignedShift | * | * |
SingleSource/Regression/C/sumarray2d | * | * |
SingleSource/Regression/C/PR1386 | * | * |
SingleSource/Regression/C/ConstructorDestructorAttributes | * | * |
SingleSource/Regression/C/2003-05-21-UnionTest | * | * |
SingleSource/Regression/C/2008-01-07-LongDouble | * | * |
SingleSource/Regression/C/2003-05-14-initialize-string | *...
2008 Feb 03
0
[LLVMdev] 2.2 Prerelease available for testing
...0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/Regression/C/2008-01-07-LongDouble | 0.0016 548 0.0021 * 0.0020 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.00 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/Regression/C/ConstructorDestructorAttributes | 0.0021 712 0.0037 * 0.0035 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/Regression/C/DuffsDevice | 0.0098 1328 0.0049 * 0.0047 | 0.00...
2007 Sep 18
0
[LLVMdev] 2.1 Pre-Release Available (testers needed)
...0.01 * 0.02 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/Regression/C/2005-05-06-LongLongSignedShift | 0.0000 556 0.0040 * 0.0000 | 0.01 0.00 0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/Regression/C/ConstructorDestructorAttributes | 0.0080 696 0.0040 * 0.0000 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/Regression/C/DuffsDevice | 0.0040 1324 0.0080 * 0.0080 | 0.00...
2008 Jan 24
6
[LLVMdev] 2.2 Prerelease available for testing
LLVMers,
The 2.2 prerelease is now available for testing:
http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.2/
If anyone can help test this release, I ask that you do the following:
1) Build llvm and llvm-gcc (or use a binary). You may build release
(default) or debug. You may pick llvm-gcc-4.0, llvm-gcc-4.2, or both.
2) Run 'make check'.
3) In llvm-test, run 'make TEST=nightly report'.
4) When
2007 Sep 18
0
[LLVMdev] 2.1 Pre-Release Available (testers needed)
...0.01 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/Regression/C/2005-05-06-LongLongSignedShift | 0.0027 564 0.0019 * 0.0018 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/Regression/C/ConstructorDestructorAttributes | 0.0030 704 0.0073 * 0.0064 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.02 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/Regression/C/DuffsDevice | 0.0147 1316 0.0045 * 0.0070 | 0.00...
2008 Jan 28
0
[LLVMdev] 2.2 Prerelease available for testing
...0.00 * 0.00 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/Regression/C/2008-01-07-LongDouble | 0.0007 568 0.0011 * 0.0013 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.00 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/Regression/C/ConstructorDestructorAttributes | 0.0012 744 0.0017 * 0.0017 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.00 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/Regression/C/DuffsDevice | 0.0036 1372 0.0021 * 0.0021 | 0.00...
2009 Oct 20
1
[LLVMdev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing
... 0.01 | - - n/a n/a
> SingleSource/Regression/C/2008-01-07-LongDouble |
> 0.0000 596 0.0000 * 0.0100 | 0.00 0.00
> 0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a
> SingleSource/Regression/C/ConstructorDestructorAttributes |
> 0.0000 760 0.0000 * 0.0000 | 0.00 0.01
> 0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a
> SingleSource/Regression/C/DuffsDevice |
> 0.0000 1084 0.0000 * 0.0100...
2009 Oct 20
0
[LLVMdev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing
Hi Tanya,
> 1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects
> directory (name it llvm-test or test-suite). Choose to use a
> pre-compiled llvm-gcc or re-compile it yourself.
I compiled llvm and llvm-gcc with separate objects directories.
Platform is x86_64-linux-gnu.
> 2) Run make check, report any failures (FAIL or unexpected pass). Note
> that you need to
2009 Oct 20
1
[LLVMdev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing
...- n/a n/a
> SingleSource/Regression/C/2008-01-07-
> LongDouble | 0.0000 596 0.0000
> * 0.0100 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 *
> 0.01 | - - n/a n/a
> SingleSource/Regression/C/
> ConstructorDestructorAttributes | 0.0000 760
> 0.0000 * 0.0000 | 0.00 0.01 0.00
> * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a
> SingleSource/Regression/C/
> DuffsDevice | 0.0000 1084
> 0.0000 *...
2007 Sep 15
22
[LLVMdev] 2.1 Pre-Release Available (testers needed)
LLVMers,
The 2.1 pre-release (version 1) is available for testing:
http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version1/
I'm looking for members of the LLVM community to test the 2.1
release. There are 2 ways you can help:
1) Download llvm-2.1, llvm-test-2.1, and the appropriate llvm-gcc4.0
binary. Run "make check" and the full llvm-test suite (make
TEST=nightly report).
2) Download
2009 Oct 17
12
[LLVMdev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing
LLVMers,
2.6 pre-release2 is ready to be tested by the community.
http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.6/
If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release.
To test llvm-gcc:
1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects
directory (name it llvm-test or test-suite). Choose to use a pre-
compiled llvm-gcc or re-compile it yourself.
2) Run make check,
2009 Feb 07
11
[LLVMdev] 2.5 Pre-release1 available for testing
LLVMers,
The 2.5 pre-release is available for testing:
http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.5/
If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release.
Please do the following:
1) Download/compile llvm source, and either compile llvm-gcc source or
use llvm-gcc binary (please compile llvm-gcc with fortran if you can).
2) Run make check, send me the testrun.log
3) Run "make
2014 Jan 28
3
[LLVMdev] MergeFunctions: reduce complexity to O(log(N))
Hi Stepan,
Sorry for the delay. It's great that you are working on MergeFunctions
as well and I agree, we should definitely try to combine our efforts to
improve MergeFunctions.
Just to give you some context, the pass (with the similar function
merging patch) is already being used in a production setting. From my
point of view, it would be better if we focus on improving its
capability
2014 Jan 30
3
[LLVMdev] MergeFunctions: reduce complexity to O(log(N))
...36921
config3.ll 2 35228 0 0.01 35195 0 0.01 35195
configfile.ll 17 322639 0 0.03 322618 0 0.03 322618
conflicts.ll 13 110041 0 0.02 110015 0 0.02 110015
consistent.ll 2 9625 0 0.01 9600 0 0.01 9600
ConsoleClose.ll 6 10504 0 0.01 10468 0 0.01 10468
constants.ll 6 468828 0 0.05 468813 0 0.05 468813
ConstructorDestructorAttributes.ll 3 1742 0 0.01 1730 0 0.01 1730
contain.ll 18 76106 0 0.02 76076 0 0.02 72452
context_ini.ll 12 306158 0 0.03 306137 0 0.03 306137
context.ll 2 20575 0 0.01 20557 0 0.01 20557
cont.ll 1 5257 0 0.01 5228 0 0.01 5228
convert.ll 5 15405 0 0.01 15375 0 0.01 15375
CopyCoder.ll 15 42021 0 0.01 41987...