Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "constraits".
Did you mean:
constraints
2008 Jul 25
3
Maximization under constraits
I''m looking for a R function which can maximise this logliklihood function,
under the constraits a>0 e b>0
f<-function(param){
a<-param[1]
b <-param[2]
log(prod)-(a*s2)-(b*s)-n*log(1-((0.5*b/sqrt(a))*(exp((b^2)/(4*a)))*((sqrt(pi
))*(1-pnorm(-b/(2*sqrt(a)), mean=0, sd=1)))))}
I''ve tried maxlik constrOptim e donlp2 but without success.
Thanks so much!!!...
2009 Jun 16
0
ui and ci explanatory documentation
...ood to
know also.
Any pointer or advice would be useful.
Thank you!
Stu
****Original posting*****
by <http://www.nabble.com/user/UserProfile.jtp?user=802522> livia Jan 15,
2008; 05:58am
Hello everyone,
I would like to maximize the following function fqp with linear constraits
and the codes are as following:
a= c(0.2,0.3,0.4)
vcov=matrix(c(1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9),3,3)
fqp <- function(b) {t(b)%*%a-0.5*((t(b)%*%vcov)%*%b)}
constrOptim(c(b1,b2,b3), fqp,NULL,ui=?, ci=?, control=list(fnscale=-1))
The linear constrait is like abs(b1)+ abs(b2)+abs(b3) <= 1.5. How can I s...
2008 Jun 18
1
[LLVMdev] Constraints
On Wednesday 18 June 2008 01:30, Evan Cheng wrote:
> On Jun 17, 2008, at 1:36 PM, David Greene wrote:
> > Can someone explain the Constraints system in X86*.td?
> >
> > For example:
> >
> > let Constraints = "$src1 = $dst"
> >
> > This replaces isTwoAddress (according to svn logs), which I gather
> > is how
> > two-address
2008 Jun 17
2
[LLVMdev] Constraints
Can someone explain the Constraints system in X86*.td?
For example:
let Constraints = "$src1 = $dst"
This replaces isTwoAddress (according to svn logs), which I gather is how
two-address instructions used to be marked for X86.
Except isTwoAddress is still used in X86InstInfo.td.
So what gives? What do these two properties actually do?
2008 Jun 18
0
[LLVMdev] Constraints
On Jun 17, 2008, at 1:36 PM, David Greene wrote:
> Can someone explain the Constraints system in X86*.td?
>
> For example:
>
> let Constraints = "$src1 = $dst"
>
> This replaces isTwoAddress (according to svn logs), which I gather
> is how
> two-address instructions used to be marked for X86.
You're right. This is the same as isTwoAddress, just more