Displaying 11 results from an estimated 11 matches for "constfoundbucket".
2019 Feb 23
2
Making LLD PDB generation faster
Hi,
Is anyone working on making the PDB generation on LLD faster? Looking
of a trace for linking one of our binaries (it takes 1min6s-1min20s) I
see two things:
1) LookupBucketFor(Val, ConstFoundBucket); takes 35s so almost half of
the time of linking, mostly finding duplicates
2) There is no parallelization inside of addObjectsToPDB
Is anyone working on those? Also has anyone thought about merging .obj
files to deduplicate type infomation so we can do the linking on
projects to generate somethi...
2019 Feb 24
2
Making LLD PDB generation faster
...onardo Santagada via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote:
Hi,
Is anyone working on making the PDB generation on LLD faster? Looking
of a trace for linking one of our binaries (it takes 1min6s-1min20s) I
see two things:
1) LookupBucketFor(Val, ConstFoundBucket); takes 35s so almost half of
the time of linking, mostly finding duplicates
2) There is no parallelization inside of addObjectsToPDB
Is anyone working on those? Also has anyone thought about merging .obj
files to deduplicate type infomation so we can do the linking on
projects to generate somethi...
2019 Feb 25
4
Making LLD PDB generation faster
...eonardo Santagada via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Is anyone working on making the PDB generation on LLD faster? Looking
> of a trace for linking one of our binaries (it takes 1min6s-1min20s) I
> see two things:
>
> 1) LookupBucketFor(Val, ConstFoundBucket); takes 35s so almost half of
> the time of linking, mostly finding duplicates
> 2) There is no parallelization inside of addObjectsToPDB
>
> Is anyone working on those? Also has anyone thought about merging .obj
> files to deduplicate type infomation so we can do the linking on
&...
2019 Feb 25
2
Making LLD PDB generation faster
...dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Is anyone working on making the PDB generation on LLD faster?
> > Looking of a trace for linking one of our binaries (it takes
> > 1min6s-1min20s) I see two things:
> >
> > 1) LookupBucketFor(Val, ConstFoundBucket); takes 35s so almost half
> > of the time of linking, mostly finding duplicates
> > 2) There is no parallelization inside of addObjectsToPDB
> >
> > Is anyone working on those? Also has anyone thought about merging
> > .obj files to deduplicate type infomation so we...
2019 Feb 25
3
Making LLD PDB generation faster
...> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Is anyone working on making the PDB generation on LLD faster?
> > > Looking of a trace for linking one of our binaries (it takes
> > > 1min6s-1min20s) I see two things:
> > >
> > > 1) LookupBucketFor(Val, ConstFoundBucket); takes 35s so almost
> > > half of the time of linking, mostly finding duplicates
> > > 2) There is no parallelization inside of addObjectsToPDB
> > >
> > > Is anyone working on those? Also has anyone thought about merging
> > > .obj files to deduplic...
2019 Feb 25
2
Making LLD PDB generation faster
...gt;> > > > Is anyone working on making the PDB generation on LLD faster?
>> > > > Looking of a trace for linking one of our binaries (it takes
>> > > > 1min6s-1min20s) I see two things:
>> > > >
>> > > > 1) LookupBucketFor(Val, ConstFoundBucket); takes 35s so almost
>> > > > half of the time of linking, mostly finding duplicates
>> > > > 2) There is no parallelization inside of addObjectsToPDB
>> > > >
>> > > > Is anyone working on those? Also has anyone thought about merging
>...
2019 Feb 25
5
Making LLD PDB generation faster
...t; Is anyone working on making the PDB generation on LLD faster?
> >> > > > Looking of a trace for linking one of our binaries (it takes
> >> > > > 1min6s-1min20s) I see two things:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > 1) LookupBucketFor(Val, ConstFoundBucket); takes 35s so almost
> >> > > > half of the time of linking, mostly finding duplicates
> >> > > > 2) There is no parallelization inside of addObjectsToPDB
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Is anyone working on those? Also has anyone thoug...
2019 Feb 25
2
Making LLD PDB generation faster
...gt;> > > > Is anyone working on making the PDB generation on LLD faster?
>> > > > Looking of a trace for linking one of our binaries (it takes
>> > > > 1min6s-1min20s) I see two things:
>> > > >
>> > > > 1) LookupBucketFor(Val, ConstFoundBucket); takes 35s so almost
>> > > > half of the time of linking, mostly finding duplicates
>> > > > 2) There is no parallelization inside of addObjectsToPDB
>> > > >
>> > > > Is anyone working on those? Also has anyone thought about merging
>...
2019 Feb 25
2
Making LLD PDB generation faster
...on making the PDB generation on LLD faster?
> > >> > > > Looking of a trace for linking one of our binaries (it takes
> > >> > > > 1min6s-1min20s) I see two things:
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > 1) LookupBucketFor(Val, ConstFoundBucket); takes 35s so
> > >> > > > almost half of the time of linking, mostly finding duplicates
> > >> > > > 2) There is no parallelization inside of addObjectsToPDB
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Is anyone working on those? A...
2019 Feb 27
4
Making LLD PDB generation faster
...ter?
> > > > >> > > > Looking of a trace for linking one of our binaries (it takes
> > > > >> > > > 1min6s-1min20s) I see two things:
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > > 1) LookupBucketFor(Val, ConstFoundBucket); takes 35s so
> > > > >> > > > almost half of the time of linking, mostly finding
> duplicates
> > > > >> > > > 2) There is no parallelization inside of addObjectsToPDB
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >>...
2019 Feb 28
3
Making LLD PDB generation faster
...eneration on LLD faster?
> > > >> > > > Looking of a trace for linking one of our binaries (it takes
> > > >> > > > 1min6s-1min20s) I see two things:
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > 1) LookupBucketFor(Val, ConstFoundBucket); takes 35s so
> > > >> > > > almost half of the time of linking, mostly finding duplicates
> > > >> > > > 2) There is no parallelization inside of addObjectsToPDB
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > Is anyone...