search for: constantpoolmapti

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "constantpoolmapti".

Did you mean: constantpoolmapty
2013 Dec 17
0
[LLVMdev] Implementing the ldr pseudo instruction in ARM integrated assembler
Hi David, Maybe I’m just blind, but where’s the code to handle the .ltorg directive? Is that a separate patch, maybe? Without that, this is not going to be usable in any circumstance using subsections-via-symbols. +typedef std::map<const MCSection *, ConstantPool> ConstantPoolMapTy; This feels odd to me. Can you elaborate a bit more on the data structure choices?? I would have expected
2013 Dec 17
2
[LLVMdev] Implementing the ldr pseudo instruction in ARM integrated assembler
Hi Jim, Thanks for the review. It seems like you were looking at an old patch. I've attached the latest patches to this email (and a squashed version of all three for easy reading). I believe many of your concerns were addressed. See below for a detailed response. > Maybe I'm just blind, but where's the code to handle the .ltorg directive? It is implemented in patch 0003 in this
2013 Nov 16
2
[LLVMdev] Implementing the ldr pseudo instruction in ARM integrated assembler
Moving discussion to llvm-commits now that I have a more developed implementation: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20131111/195401. html > -----Original Message----- > From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On > Behalf Of David Peixotto > Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 11:09 AM > To: 'Amara Emerson' >
2013 Dec 17
0
[LLVMdev] Implementing the ldr pseudo instruction in ARM integrated assembler
On Dec 17, 2013, at 11:33 AM, David Peixotto <dpeixott at codeaurora.org> wrote: > Hi Jim, > > Thanks for the review. It seems like you were looking at an old patch. I've > attached the latest patches to this email (and a squashed version of all > three for easy reading). I believe many of your concerns were addressed. See > below for a detailed response. > Ack!