search for: constable

I came across this thread from a couple years ago: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-November/119346.html Has there been any progress on RDF for X86? Or is there some other preferred alternative for performing reachability analysis after register allocation? Thanks, Scott Constable -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20191108/a1736aee/attachment.html>

...ndamental problems that would make it not work on x86. -- Krzysztof Parzyszek kparzysz at quicinc.com<mailto:kparzysz at quicinc.com> AI tools development From: llvm-dev <llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org>> On Behalf Of Scott Douglas Constable via llvm-dev Sent: Friday, November 8, 2019 10:59 AM To: llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> Subject: [EXT] [llvm-dev] Register Dataflow Analysis on X86 I came across this thread from a couple years ago: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-November/119346...

...11 in s1578 is not connected directly to the use in s1725 is that there may be an intervening def between them (that phi node of the register mask may be one such def). -- Krzysztof Parzyszek kparzysz at quicinc.com<mailto:kparzysz at quicinc.com> AI tools development From: Scott Douglas Constable <sdconsta at syr.edu> Sent: Friday, December 27, 2019 5:58 PM To: Krzysztof Parzyszek <kparzysz at quicinc.com> Cc: llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org Subject: [EXT] Re: [llvm-dev] Register Dataflow Analysis on X86 Hi Krzysztof, Thanks for the reply, I'm starting to understand the graph s...

...ets of registers), so if it includes R9D and R11D, it will be treated as being aliased with both. These separate defs are there because they reach disjoint registers. -- Krzysztof Parzyszek kparzysz at quicinc.com<mailto:kparzysz at quicinc.com> AI tools development From: Scott Douglas Constable <sdconsta at syr.edu> Sent: Monday, December 23, 2019 2:10 PM To: Scott Douglas Constable <sdconsta at syr.edu> Cc: Krzysztof Parzyszek <kparzysz at quicinc.com>; llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org Subject: [EXT] Re: [llvm-dev] Register Dataflow Analysis on X86 Revisiting this thread. I...

...eve_imapsieve sieve_extprograms sieve_quota_max_scripts = 0 sieve_quota_max_storage = 0 sieve_redirect_envelope_from = recipient sieve_vacation_default_period = 60s sieve_vacation_max_period = 0 sieve_vacation_min_period = 5s sieve_vacation_send_from_recipient = yes } -- Mark Constable 0419 530 037 https://spiderweb.com.au

On 06 Jul 2020, at 20:30, Mark Constable <markc at renta.net> wrote: > you could try disabling SSL/STARTTLS on port 143. What? I?ve never seen SSL/StARTTLS on port 143,a dn I doubt that would work? -- Rumour is information distilled so finely that it can filter through anything. It does not need doors and windows -- sometimes...

On Tue Jul 07 2020 02:07:08 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time), Mark Constable <markc at renta.net> wrote: > FWIW I meant if the client is Windows7/old-Outlook then changing either > 993/SSL or 143/STARTTLS to 143/NONE could help pick up the mail. We had > to do this for a 100 or so clients a few months ago after upgrading to > Ubuntu 20.04. Really, really...

...SA**** # https://ssl-config.mozilla.org MEDIUM # openssl dhparam -dsaparam 2048 > /etc/dovecot/dh.pem #ssl_prefer_server_ciphers = no #ssl_min_protocol = TLSv1.2 #ssl_cipher_list = ECDHE-ECDSA**** ~ dovecot --version 2.3.7.2 (3c910f64b) Apologies to the OP for hijacking this thread. -- Mark Constable 0419 530 037 https://spiderweb.com.au

I currently use Ubuntu 20.04 with Dovecot 2.3.7.2 and OpenSSL 1.1.1f. A few months ago there was an update to all these systems and since then I've had to talk W7 and old Mac clients through disabling ports 993/995 with TLS enabled back to ports 143/110 without SSL or they could not pick up email. Thunderbird users (ie; me) were unaffected. Could anyone share a set of port 993/995 SSL

I want to supply separate Letsencrypt certificates for each virtual domain and seeing that SNI does not work I need to allocate separate IPs. Could anyone give some pointers, or keywords to search for, on... a) how to make dovecot listen for different domains on different IPs? b) how to configure separate SSL certs for each of these IPs?

Perhaps I have not looked hard enough but is it possible to get at the current users auth userdb "home" (or $HOME) variable from inside a sieve script? Example?

On Tue, Jul 07, 2020 at 01:45:06AM +0300, Sami Ketola wrote: > > > > On 7. Jul 2020, at 0.48, The Doctor <doctor at doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote: > > > > Got a client that usually uses Outlook I think 2010. This person tends to move > > their e-mails to certain folers. On Thunderbird, the move shows. > > Not on Outlook. > > > > Any

Am 07.07.2020 um 08:07 schrieb Mark Constable: > > FWIW I meant if the client is Windows7/old-Outlook then changing either > 993/SSL or 143/STARTTLS to 143/NONE could help pick up the mail. We had > to do this for a 100 or so clients a few months ago after upgrading to > Ubuntu 20.04. Curious, what's the rationale behind t...

I've looking for a solution for this and no amount of googling has come up with anything. Is it possible to provide a static listing on a server, say every 24 hours, that a standard end-user rsync can pull and use? I have a lot of files to provide and the idea of every request dynamically providing a file list in real time is killing my server and is simply not needed. I am quite prepared to

FWIW this took me days to get right, and still needs tinkering, but it might make for a good starting point for anyone else needing something similar (ie; I don't use or need the overhead of spamassassin or rspamd). https://gist.github.com/markc/eeeb66ce30ea805af62631656cf86c4d Any comments or corrections on that page would be appreciated.

Op 4/3/2017 om 1:52 PM schreef Mark Constable: > Perhaps I have not looked hard enough but is it possible to get at the > current users auth userdb "home" (or $HOME) variable from inside a sieve > script? Example? What do you want to do with it? Regards, Stephan.

<!doctype html> <html> <head> <meta charset="UTF-8"> </head> <body> <div> <br> </div> <blockquote type="cite"> <div> On 31/05/2020 07:36 Mark Constable <<a href="mailto:markc@renta.net">markc@renta.net</a>> wrote: </div> <div> <br> </div> <div> <br> </div> <div> I currently use Ubuntu 20.04 with Dovecot 2.3.7.2 and OpenSSL 1.1.1f. </div&...

On 5/31/20 11:54 AM, Aki Tuomi wrote: > >> On 31/05/2020 07:36 Mark Constable <markc at renta.net >> <mailto:markc at renta.net>> wrote: >> >> >> I currently use Ubuntu 20.04 with Dovecot 2.3.7.2 and OpenSSL 1.1.1f. >> >> A few months ago there was an update to all these systems and since >> then I've had to talk W7...

...Any explanation? > > Using IMAp, most folders should sync client and server. Just > wondering if an old version of Outlook has passed its time. FWIW if they happen to be using Windows7 and dovecot has been updated recently then you could try disabling SSL/STARTTLS on port 143. -- Mark Constable 0419 530 037 https://spiderweb.com.au

...r wifi or public networks, no danger. -----Ursprungligt meddelande----- Fr?n: dovecot-bounces at dovecot.org <dovecot-bounces at dovecot.org> F?r Alexander Dalloz Skickat: den 7 juli 2020 18:05 Till: dovecot at dovecot.org ?mne: Re: Outlook vs Thunderbird Am 07.07.2020 um 08:07 schrieb Mark Constable: > > FWIW I meant if the client is Windows7/old-Outlook then changing > either 993/SSL or 143/STARTTLS to 143/NONE could help pick up the > mail. We had to do this for a 100 or so clients a few months ago after > upgrading to Ubuntu 20.04. Curious, what's the rationale behin...