Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "constaa".
Did you mean:
consta
2011 Oct 03
0
[LLVMdev] RTTI handling
...uiuc.edu<mailto:llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu>>
Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] RTTI handling
On Oct 3, 2011, at 4:42 AM, Somorjai, Akos wrote:
I'm trying to use this warning to check the vtable problem. Here's an example
In mem.hpp
classAA {
// Construction / destruction:
protected:
AA ();
AA (constAA&); // Disabled
public:
virtual ~AA ();
};
In mem.cpp
#include "mem.hpp"
AA::~AA()
{
}
And I still get the following warning:
warning: 'AA' has no out-of-line virtual method definitions; its vtable will be emitted in every translation unit [-Wweak-vtables,3]
Which version...
2011 Oct 03
2
[LLVMdev] RTTI handling
On Oct 3, 2011, at 4:42 AM, Somorjai, Akos wrote:
> I'm trying to use this warning to check the vtable problem. Here's an example
>
> In mem.hpp
>
> class
> AA {
> // Construction / destruction:
> protected:
> AA ();
> AA (const AA&); // Disabled
> public:
> virtual ~AA ();
> };
>
> In mem.cpp
>
> #include "mem.hpp"
>
2011 Oct 05
2
[LLVMdev] RTTI handling
...uiuc.edu<mailto:llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu>>
Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] RTTI handling
On Oct 3, 2011, at 4:42 AM, Somorjai, Akos wrote:
I'm trying to use this warning to check the vtable problem. Here's an example
In mem.hpp
classAA {
// Construction / destruction:
protected:
AA ();
AA (constAA&); // Disabled
public:
virtual ~AA ();
};
In mem.cpp
#include "mem.hpp"
AA::~AA()
{
}
And I still get the following warning:
warning: 'AA' has no out-of-line virtual method definitions; its vtable will be emitted in every translation unit [-Wweak-vtables,3]
Which version...