search for: consistenly

Hello. I'd like to backup kvm guests running from lvm partitions on the host without as little downtime as possible, preferably without stopping them. Could libvirt help me with this? Could anybody point me to some documentation? The question is what happens to the filesystem if I snapshot it from the host. LVM is supposed to tell the filesystem to make itself consistent but I don't know

Hello folks, I use dovecot squat for indexing. I use to have fts_squat = partial=4 full=4 But i change to fts_squat = partial=4 full=8 My question is, do i need to delete older indexes to have it consistenly, or dovecot is able "update" the indexes or it sees that it is broken and rebuild it all? Other question, is there an comand line to update the indexes ? Thanks a lot! []'sf.rique

Hi All, I have the following problem: x = c(1,2) x [1] 1 2 as.matrix(x) [,1] [1,] 1 [2,] 2 BUT, if I add: y = c(3,4) as.matrix(rbind(x,y)) [,1] [,2] x 1 2 y 3 4 It does not transpose. Since I will need as.matrix() for a list of data that is in one or more lines, I need as.matrix to behave in a consisten fashions, so I get as.matrix(x, whatever) [,1] [,2] x 1

...r all. I assume you are thinking about creating custom linker sections with list of init functions; Similar to the existing constructors sections but running at a time controlled by llvm code. While the compiler/linker nerd in me would love doing that, I could see this being very tricky to pull off consistenly on all platforms. We should not forget that there is a portable and proven solution: Just write the code! So here comes the strawman: static Statistic NumBlips("blips"); static cl::opt MyOpt("my-cool-option", cl::desc("bla")); static cl::opt AnotherOpt("bla&quo...

OK..this is driving me nuts. I cannot print from Windoze, consistenly getting a "Access denied; Unable to connect" error message" from my samba print server. Config --- Server: RH9.0 uptodate with patches, errata. Samba 2.2.7 HP OfficeJet K60 - hpoj 0.90-14 Client: Win2K w/sp4 HP OfficeJet K60 driver What I *can* do --- Print just fine...

The search on this forum should improve to improve the forum -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

This code consistenly segfaults for me. Can someone please take a look and tell me if the problem is due to something I am doing or is there a problems with the dwt (idwt) functions in the waveslim library. Thanks tom library(waveslim) data<-c(936.944,936.944,936.944,936.944,936.944,936.944,936.944,936.944,936.944...

Hello all, we are using rsync to produce a replica of our filesystem. it's very important for us to be sure that the files replicated on the remote backup host are left in a consistent state as we may need to boot services from those files (configs, logs, etc)! right now we use a 'greedy approach'... we stop all important services (dhcpd, squid, sendmail, etc) just to minimize the

...esting previously). The VM restores reasonably OK, but it jumps to an invalid address shortly after restoring, giving a D1 blue-screen error (DRIVER_IRQL_LESS_OR_EQUAL), which turns out to be "page-fault in driver" after I looked at the memory dump in windbg. (The address it jumps to is consistenly a0000ca5, if that''s of any meaning to anyone). I''ve compared my svm.c that I had previously and the current one that I got from mercurial, and they are identical. I went back to my 13568 build of the hypervisor, and it works there... There''s no obvious changes in betw...

.... > I assume you are thinking about creating custom linker sections with list of init functions; Similar to the existing constructors sections but running at a time controlled by llvm code. While the compiler/linker nerd in me would love doing that, I could see this being very tricky to pull off consistenly on all platforms. > > We should not forget that there is a portable and proven solution: Just write the code! I agree, and there was a proposal in the past for cl::opt (I believe from Chris B.). The idea would be to have explicit registration (from the pass ctor for instance) and the storag...

...t;> I assume you are thinking about creating custom linker sections with list of init functions; Similar to the existing constructors sections but running at a time controlled by llvm code. While the compiler/linker nerd in me would love doing that, I could see this being very tricky to pull off consistenly on all platforms. >>>> >>>> We should not forget that there is a portable and proven solution: Just write the code! >>> >>> I agree, and there was a proposal in the past for cl::opt (I believe from Chris B.). The idea would be to have explicit registratio...

...t;> I assume you are thinking about creating custom linker sections with list of init functions; Similar to the existing constructors sections but running at a time controlled by llvm code. While the compiler/linker nerd in me would love doing that, I could see this being very tricky to pull off consistenly on all platforms. >>> >>> We should not forget that there is a portable and proven solution: Just write the code! >> >> I agree, and there was a proposal in the past for cl::opt (I believe from Chris B.). The idea would be to have explicit registration (from the pass...

...t;> I assume you are thinking about creating custom linker sections with list of init functions; Similar to the existing constructors sections but running at a time controlled by llvm code. While the compiler/linker nerd in me would love doing that, I could see this being very tricky to pull off consistenly on all platforms. >>>>> >>>>> We should not forget that there is a portable and proven solution: Just write the code! >>>> >>>> I agree, and there was a proposal in the past for cl::opt (I believe from Chris B.). The idea would be to have expl...

...t;> I assume you are thinking about creating custom linker sections with list of init functions; Similar to the existing constructors sections but running at a time controlled by llvm code. While the compiler/linker nerd in me would love doing that, I could see this being very tricky to pull off consistenly on all platforms. >> >> We should not forget that there is a portable and proven solution: Just write the code! > > I agree, and there was a proposal in the past for cl::opt (I believe from Chris B.). The idea would be to have explicit registration (from the pass ctor for instan...

...consider it a work > in progress, but from my testing, it consistently performs better than > the old code already, sometimes considerably so (on my laptop, dumping > out data over serial from a HVM DomU -> pty in Dom0 was up to 5.3 > times faster than with the old 16450 code). I can consistenly reach > full 115200 baud speeds over physical serial lines when the virtual > device is backed by a phys port, which I never could with the old code. > > There are still some things to be done. I want to add proper error > handling, so that overflow/framing & parity errors on th...

...t;> I assume you are thinking about creating custom linker sections with list of init functions; Similar to the existing constructors sections but running at a time controlled by llvm code. While the compiler/linker nerd in me would love doing that, I could see this being very tricky to pull off consistenly on all platforms. >>>>>> >>>>>> We should not forget that there is a portable and proven solution: Just write the code! >>>>> >>>>> I agree, and there was a proposal in the past for cl::opt (I believe from Chris B.). The idea would...

...t;> I assume you are thinking about creating custom linker sections with list of init functions; Similar to the existing constructors sections but running at a time controlled by llvm code. While the compiler/linker nerd in me would love doing that, I could see this being very tricky to pull off consistenly on all platforms. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> We should not forget that there is a portable and proven solution: Just write the code! >>>>>> >>>>>> I agree, and there was a proposal in the past for cl::opt (I believe from Chris B.)...

...t;> I assume you are thinking about creating custom linker sections with list of init functions; Similar to the existing constructors sections but running at a time controlled by llvm code. While the compiler/linker nerd in me would love doing that, I could see this being very tricky to pull off consistenly on all platforms. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> We should not forget that there is a portable and proven solution: Just write the code! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I agree, and there was a proposal in the past for cl::opt (I believ...

...t;> I assume you are thinking about creating custom linker sections with list of init functions; Similar to the existing constructors sections but running at a time controlled by llvm code. While the compiler/linker nerd in me would love doing that, I could see this being very tricky to pull off consistenly on all platforms. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> We should not forget that there is a portable and proven solution: Just write the code! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I agree, and there was a proposal i...

Dear Friends. I found something very puzzling with constOptim(). When I change the parameters for ConstrOptim, the error messages do not seem to be consistent with each other: > constrOptim(c(0.5,0.3,0.5), f=fit.error, gr=fit.error.grr, ui=ui,ci=ci) Error in constrOptim(c(0.5, 0.3, 0.5), f = fit.error, gr = fit.error.grr, : initial value not feasible > constrOptim(c(0.5,0.9,0.5),