search for: considerforloop

...tcond10, label %bb6, label %bb0 bb6: ; preds = %bb3 ret i32 0 } LoopInfo: Loop Containing: %bb0, %bb3, %bb1 Loop Containing: %bb1 I would need to operate in the two loops in rotated form. It can be considered a bug or I have to introduce manually the header (or modify myself the ConsiderForLoop to my particular problem)? Thanks. Julio -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20080713/cfacf586/attachment.html>

On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 3:45 PM, Julio <julio.martin.hidalgo at gmail.com> wrote: > I would need to operate in the two loops in rotated form. It can be > considered a bug or I have to introduce manually the header (or modify > myself the ConsiderForLoop to my particular problem)? Try adding "AU.addRequiredID(LoopSimplifyID);AU.addPreservedID(LoopSimplifyID);" to your transformation pass. -Eli