search for: consideration

Hello again, There is any package which does Z aware (real 3D) interpolations? It can be any method (IDW, kriging or spline) but it should take into consideration not only x and y coordinates for interpolation, but also z coordinate. I looked into different packages but it seems i didn't find the right one. The ultimate goal is to import the output into a GIS (Geographical Information System) for further analysis. Alternatively, maybe you know a sou...

...ot;. > Regards, > > Ricardo Martinez.- > > > -----Mensaje original----- > > De: Andres [mailto:andres@telesip.net] > > Enviado el: Martes, 05 de Julio de 2005 17:17 > > Para: Giovanni Balasso > > CC: serusers@iptel.org > > Asunto: Re: [Serusers] NAT considerations... > > > > > > Giovanni Balasso wrote: > > > > >Just some thoughts based on my experience... > > >After months trying to make everything work using > > rtpproxy-mediaproxy with > > >almost everything accomplished but video, I tried to switch...

...er.html If it does get to the wiki, I would remove the fedora section and also add a notice at the beginning of the article with dire warnings about using a non-stock kernel. (I would probably copy the warning on red background from http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Custom_Kernel) Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, -- Scott Robbins PGP keyID EB3467D6 ( 1B48 077D 66F6 9DB0 FDC2 A409 FA54 EB34 67D6 ) gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys EB3467D6 Faith: You can't trust guys. Buffy: You can trust some guys. Really, I've read about them.

...e copied from one local linux machine to another. Since both systems are on the same local subnet, there's no need for encryption. I've done this sort of thing before a few times in the past in different ways, but wanted to get input from others on what's worked best for them. One consideration is that the source filesystem contains quite a few hardlinks and symlinks and of course I want to preserve these, and preserve all timestamps and ownerships and permissions as well. Maintaining the integrity of this metadata and the integrity of the files themselves if of course the top prior...

Just a quick question: is greedy still a local allocator (i.e. only takes into consideration the current bb) or a global one (takes into consideration the whole function)? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20110926/d87aa2bd/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A no...

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3529 Bug ID: 3529 Summary: `add_host_to_hostfile` should take into consideration that the known_hosts file isn't terminated with a newline character. Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 9.1p1 Hardware: ix86 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priori...

Hello! I am switching hardware platform for my dovecot 1.0beta3 installation. From Sun Sparc (SS4) to Intel i386. OS platform will only change from OpenBSD 3.7 to 3.9. From Dovecot 1.0beta3 to beta8. Is there anything special to consider, in terms of endianness or other incompatibilities? I plan on a fresh install (compile) on the new machine, migrate the settings manually (by hand), test

We''ve just come across an issue for consideration. I am avoiding some words which would allow people to find this message in an internet search who have questionable intentions, but wish to communicate a strong sense of caution. Consider someone who adds extra methods to their controller which they use in their main get/post methods to do...

...ot;adding fields" is bad terminology -- we're really talking about > setting the struct's list of fields, which you can only do once. (You > can't add yet more fields later.) The name-noname distinction still seems artificial to me. I assume it is being driven by efficiency considerations: i.e. not allowing named types to be refined simplifies LLVM's internals considerably. Ciao, Duncan.

I've read about securelevel in the mailing list archive, and found some pitfalls (and seems to me to be discarded soon). But According to me, the following configuration should offer a good security: - mount root fs read only at boot; - set securelevel to 3; - do not permit to unmount/remount roots fs read-write (now it is possible by means of "mount -uw /"); - the only way to make

I am working with some large text files (up to 16 GBytes). I am interested in extracting the words and counting each time each word appears in the text. I have written a very simple R program by following some suggestions and examples I found online. If my input file is 1 GByte, I see that R uses up to 11 GBytes of memory when executing the program on a 64-bit system running CentOS 6.3. Why is

As long as we have SERIALIZE_ALL_REQUESTS, we don't have to worry about one thread processing a fork() while another thread might be opening an fd. But add comments to the code to remind us to fix things if we ever decide to add more parallelism. Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> --- plugins/sh/call.c | 4 ++++ plugins/sh/sh.c | 3 +++ 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+)

This patch series is fine, ACK. Unfortunately it likely breaks Haiku support. I'd like to hear from the Haiku folk if they are planning support for atomic CLOEXEC (SOCK_CLOEXEC, accept4, pipe2, etc.) Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com virt-builder quickly builds VMs

On Sat, Nov 30, 2019 at 05:19:44PM +0100, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: > Hi, > > One of my clients has a mixed Linux/Mac OS/Windows environment in his office. > He just purchased a 4 TB external hard disk, which he intends to use on his > various workstations. > > Up until recently, I've been using plain old MBR/FAT for hard disks in mixed > environments. Fire up fdisk, make

I strongly dislike moving removable disks between computers, especially with differing operating systems. I would instead recommend getting/building a NAS aka file server and using the network to share files, or make backups, or whatever. On Sat, Nov 30, 2019 at 11:38 AM Pierre Emerald <pierre.emerald at gmail.com> wrote: > What about exfat ? > > 2019?11?30?(?) 18:10 Fred Smith

Le 30/11/2019 ? 21:50, John Pierce a ?crit?: > I strongly dislike moving removable disks between computers, > especially with differing operating systems. > > I would instead recommend getting/building a NAS aka file server and using > the network to share files, or make backups, or whatever. Hell is paved with good intentions (french saying). We already have OwnCloud running

I want to set up a new IMAP server with Dovecot, so far I've been running Cyrus. I'm running dovecot on Debian Jessie. The general idea of the system would be: 1) Virtual users, i.e. login users are disjoint from any mail accounts. 2) Real-Users authenticate using their kerberos tickets. 3) There is a n-to-n mapping of real to virtual users. 4) Maildirs shall be stored on glusterfs. 5)

A. Schulze writes: > precomputing ssl-params is also possible without patching but it's a > little bit tricky > ... > Long version in german: https://andreasschulze.de/dovecot/ssl-params Nice. (You should probably point out to ensure ssl_parameters_regenerate is zero, otherwise all this work will get wiped out!) Joseph Tam <jtam.home at gmail.com>

On Fri, 4 May 2018 12:12:55 -0300 Edouard Guigné via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Dear Samba Users, > > I configured a samba share on a linux centos 7 server as server > member of an Active Directory Domain. > > I used posix extended unix attributes in AD for permissions on the > Samba share. > Winbind and SSSD are also installed for the mapping of

Dear R users, I have a txt file named 'data_1.txt' whose first column contains the names of the individuals and the other columns contain the values of four variables X_1,X_2,X_3 and X_4. I read it with R from its location and called it data. I'd like to do a normalized principal component analysis. I started by calculating the correlation matrix: cor(data) I got the following