search for: consequent

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4250 matches for "consequent".

2013 Apr 08
2
Consequence of FLushing TLB with IRQ Enable
Hi, I wanted to know if its safe to FLUSH TLB with IRQ Enable. Basically If i call local_flush_tlb_all() with IRQ''s Enabled what is the consequence? How is it normally done in Linux/Xen. Warm Regards, Akshay
2014 Apr 19
0
Re: Many orphaned inodes after resize2fs
On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 05:42:12PM +0200, Patrik HornĂ­k wrote: > > Please confirm that this is fully correct solution (for my purpose, not > elegant clean way for official fix) and it has no negative consequences. It > seems that way but I did not analyze all code paths the fixed code is in. Yes, that's a fine solution. What I'll probably do is disable the check if
2006 Jan 29
1
returned values and consequent usage
I think I can have finally reduced my problem to something somebody can help me with. I am using auto_complete... specifically the form command is... <%= text_area_auto_complete_for :case_manager :name %> I need to use the value derived here in my controller... If I use... cm = CaseManager.find(:first, :conditions => "name = ''Thomas E Dewey''") it works.
2012 Apr 10
0
Adding idmap backend = idmap_rid... and possible consequences
I have Linux machine with Samba 3.5.11 working great. I was using passdb backend = tdbsam So when I tried to setup a second Linux machine I failed..since UID/GID's were different when I copied fiels from server 1 to server 2. Would you recommend me to use IDMAP_RID with Winbind? BTW, I don't have domain trusts (which is required to be "off" when using rid). It's a
2020 Oct 05
2
llvm.dbg.declare constraints
The documentation is correct, and the observation that the IR verifier is currently not verifying this property is also correct. Due to the way that dbg.declares are handled by later stages, LLVM can only keep track of one dbg.declare per variable and that is intentional. The dbg.declare intrinsic is supposed to pin a variable to a stack slot, such as in the code that clang emits at -O0. If you
2011 May 21
1
Consequences of overriding update_attribute to force validation?
I know the debate of whether this should validate has been rehashed many times. My question is, what are the consequences of overriding this method to force validation? Will this break fundamental things? Will it break plugins? Is there a reason not to have a strict validation option? In my code I will never use this as I consider it a terribly broken method, but some gems use it and in one case
2018 Jul 24
1
Tracing the consequences of overlapped id mappings
Hi, I'm trying to find out consequences of overlapped idmap settings that used with 4.3.11 DC's. I'm about to upgrade these DC's to 4.8 version. Before deploying new DCs, I want to make sure that any side effects regarding id map settings will be left behind. # ldbsearch -H /var/lib/samba/private/idmap.ldb | grep xidNumber \ | cut -d' ' -f2 | sort 0 100 3000000
2015 Jun 20
2
sshd and consequences of HostKeyAgent
Hello, I tried to use HostKeyAgent with sshd 6.7 under Linux. That worked for Linux clients. However, when I tried to connect from OpenSSH 6.2 under Mac OS X, the server disconnects: debug2: bits set: 1026/2048 debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_INIT sent debug1: expecting SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_REPLY Connection closed by 84.22.97.209 When I disabled HostKeyAgent and switched HostKey back to the private
2008 Nov 09
2
rsync for the brave
...ing 'cwrsync' on one system to copy files from a local drive (F:) to a mapped (network) drive (Y:). The problem I'm having is with that infamous 'Network Trash Folder'. I can't get it to ignore it on the remote (mapped) drive, and it doesn't exist on the local drive. Consequently, I get this error: file has vanished: "/cygdrive/y/Network Trash Folder/Trash Can Usage Map" rsync: delete_file: rmdir(Network Trash Folder) failed: Device or resource busy (16) IO error encountered -- skipping file deletion ... and when that happens, it stops deleting those file...
2012 May 08
1
file 2 is not in sorted order error building unsuffered consequences
Hi All, I just downloaded the source tar ball (Revision: 59324 Last Changed Date: 2012-05-07) and tried to compile on a Win x64 system. I am using Rtools version 2.15.0.1919. The only change I make is changing MkRules.dist -> MkRules.local and setting Multi=64 I have previously compiled unsuffered consquences without issue, but on the current version, I get this error windres -F pe-x86-64
2015 Oct 29
2
R CMD BATCH vs R CMD batch
Hi, Out of laziness I just used "R CMD batch" instead of "R CMD BATCH". I didn't get an error so didn't think about the consequences... One consequence is (at least on Mac OS X 10.11 but probably in more generality) that R_BATCH_OPTIONS are ignored, which was kind of fatal in my case... I am thus wondering whether it makes sense to either a) have R_BATCH_OPTIONS also
2019 Mar 22
3
[cfe-dev] [lldb-dev] [GitHub] RFC: Enforcing no merge commit policy
Artem Dergachev via cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> writes: > If you're doing merge commits, you might lose linear history, but you > obtain another fancy invariant: every piece of work - i.e., every > patch, every merge conflict resolution - appears in the repository > exactly once, under a unique identifier, and the non-linear source > control history becomes an
2020 Oct 05
2
llvm.dbg.declare constraints
Hi, In the LLVM documentation it says "there can only be one call to llvm.dbg.declare for a given concrete local variable." However we don't seem to be checking it. opt tool can process IR that violates this rule without complaining. Is this intended, or is it a bug? What would be the consequence when this constraint is broken? -- Xun
2011 Oct 05
1
Moderating consequences of garbage collection when in C
Allocating many small objects triggers numerous garbage collections as R grows its memory, seriously degrading performance. The specific use case is in creating a STRSXP of several 1,000,000's of elements of 60-100 characters each; a simplified illustration understating the effects (because there is initially little to garbage collect, in contrast to an R session with several packages
2007 Jan 30
7
text_field_tag
can you use :confirm => ''great consequences'', :post => true within text_field_tag options? I''m trying to confirm with users that changing that particular field will have great consequences. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
2008 Jan 30
2
R-help going to become "subscriber-only"
Dear R-help mailing list readers, After some discussion among R foundation members (and friends), we have agreed that ``the spammer mafia (*)'' has momentarily won a battle: After more than ten years of open and free mailing lists devoted to R (development, use, etc), the increasing volume of spam {quadrupling within one year, I'm told by an expert} and the slickness of the spam
2014 Jan 02
4
EFI build problems
On 01/02/2014 04:09 AM, Ferenc Wagner wrote: > > Issuing another make after this gave the previous error again: > > isolinux.asm:1102: error: TIMES value -4 is negative > I just fixed this one... it seems to be a consequence of merging in the MOVZX isolinux fix into the firmware branch. -hpa
2004 Apr 07
5
Changing `security@freebsd.org' alias
Hello Folks, The official email address for this list is `freebsd-security@freebsd.org'. Due to convention, there is an email alias for this list: security@freebsd.org, just as there is for hackers@ & freebsd-hackers@, arch@ & freebsd-arch@, and so on. The security@freebsd.org alias has been the source of occassional problems. Several times in the past, postings have been made to
2010 Mar 04
5
3.5 issue
All, This morning, I upgraded samba to version 3.5 on CentOS 4.6 and 5.4 boxes. When trying to run any "net" command, I get the following message: net: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/libreadline.so.x: undefined symbol: PC Additionally, while I can see my shares, I can't see any of the data in them. What does the error indicate, and how can I fix it. Thanks. Dimitri --
2015 Oct 14
6
RFC: Introducing an LLVM Community Code of Conduct
On 14 October 2015 at 20:35, Tanya Lattner via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Related specifically to the developers meeting, we are growing quite > rapidly. For the past few years, we have been increasing our attendance from > 50 at the start to now over 350 attendees. With this many people (and many > new to the community), it seems important to have a code of