search for: consequ

Hi, I wanted to know if its safe to FLUSH TLB with IRQ Enable. Basically If i call local_flush_tlb_all() with IRQ''s Enabled what is the consequence? How is it normally done in Linux/Xen. Warm Regards, Akshay

On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 05:42:12PM +0200, Patrik Horník wrote: > > Please confirm that this is fully correct solution (for my purpose, not > elegant clean way for official fix) and it has no negative consequences. It > seems that way but I did not analyze all code paths the fixed code is in. Yes, that's a fine solution. What I'll probably do is disable the check if s_inodes_count is greater than s_mkfs_time minus some fudge value, or if the broken system clock boolean is set. > BTW wer...

I think I can have finally reduced my problem to something somebody can help me with. I am using auto_complete... specifically the form command is... <%= text_area_auto_complete_for :case_manager :name %> I need to use the value derived here in my controller... If I use... cm = CaseManager.find(:first, :conditions => "name = ''Thomas E Dewey''") it works.

...w\s*\spassword:* %n\n *Retype\snew\s*\spassword:* %n\n *password\supdated\ssuccessfully* . pam password change = yes map to guest = bad user usershare allow guests = yes -- View this message in context: http://samba.2283325.n4.nabble.com/Adding-idmap-backend-idmap-rid-and-possible-consequences-tp4546579p4546579.html Sent from the Samba - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

...id Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > +Aprantl for debug info IR metadata verifier things > > I don't think the verifier's rigorously comprehensive - so probably somewhere between "intended/acceptable" and "a bug". > > Not sure what the consequences might be. > > On Sun, Oct 4, 2020 at 10:03 PM Xun Li via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: > Hi, > > In the LLVM documentation it says "there can only be one call to > llvm.dbg.declare for a given concrete loca...

I know the debate of whether this should validate has been rehashed many times. My question is, what are the consequences of overriding this method to force validation? Will this break fundamental things? Will it break plugins? Is there a reason not to have a strict validation option? In my code I will never use this as I consider it a terribly broken method, but some gems use it and in one case I was just burne...

Hi, I'm trying to find out consequences of overlapped idmap settings that used with 4.3.11 DC's. I'm about to upgrade these DC's to 4.8 version. Before deploying new DCs, I want to make sure that any side effects regarding id map settings will be left behind. # ldbsearch -H /var/lib/samba/private/idmap.ldb | grep xid...

Hello, I tried to use HostKeyAgent with sshd 6.7 under Linux. That worked for Linux clients. However, when I tried to connect from OpenSSH 6.2 under Mac OS X, the server disconnects: debug2: bits set: 1026/2048 debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_INIT sent debug1: expecting SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_REPLY Connection closed by 84.22.97.209 When I disabled HostKeyAgent and switched HostKey back to the private

...ing 'cwrsync' on one system to copy files from a local drive (F:) to a mapped (network) drive (Y:). The problem I'm having is with that infamous 'Network Trash Folder'. I can't get it to ignore it on the remote (mapped) drive, and it doesn't exist on the local drive. Consequently, I get this error: file has vanished: "/cygdrive/y/Network Trash Folder/Trash Can Usage Map" rsync: delete_file: rmdir(Network Trash Folder) failed: Device or resource busy (16) IO error encountered -- skipping file deletion ... and when that happens, it stops deleting those f...

Hi All, I just downloaded the source tar ball (Revision: 59324 Last Changed Date: 2012-05-07) and tried to compile on a Win x64 system. I am using Rtools version 2.15.0.1919. The only change I make is changing MkRules.dist -> MkRules.local and setting Multi=64 I have previously compiled unsuffered consquences without issue, but on the current version, I get this error windres -F pe-x86-64

Hi, Out of laziness I just used "R CMD batch" instead of "R CMD BATCH". I didn't get an error so didn't think about the consequences... One consequence is (at least on Mac OS X 10.11 but probably in more generality) that R_BATCH_OPTIONS are ignored, which was kind of fatal in my case... I am thus wondering whether it makes sense to either a) have R_BATCH_OPTIONS also be respected for "R CMD batch" or b) simply not...

...er fancy invariant: every piece of work - i.e., every > patch, every merge conflict resolution - appears in the repository > exactly once, under a unique identifier, and the non-linear source > control history becomes an accurate representation of the real history > of development. One consequence of this is that release branches can be more easily validated. In a world with merge commits, many projects make fixes on the release branch *first*, then merge the release branch to master, ensuring that fixes in the current release make it into the next release (when that is branched off mas...

...i, In the LLVM documentation it says "there can only be one call to llvm.dbg.declare for a given concrete local variable." However we don't seem to be checking it. opt tool can process IR that violates this rule without complaining. Is this intended, or is it a bug? What would be the consequence when this constraint is broken? -- Xun

Allocating many small objects triggers numerous garbage collections as R grows its memory, seriously degrading performance. The specific use case is in creating a STRSXP of several 1,000,000's of elements of 60-100 characters each; a simplified illustration understating the effects (because there is initially little to garbage collect, in contrast to an R session with several packages

can you use :confirm => ''great consequences'', :post => true within text_field_tag options? I''m trying to confirm with users that changing that particular field will have great consequences. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message b...

...d the slickness of the spam programmers have lead to regular leaking of spam messages into R-help (and other mailing lists). Even though our filters catch > 99.9% (probably even > 99.99%) of all the spam, our mail server has now occasionally been blacklisted because of the R-help spams. The consequence of this will be that .. before the weekend .. only __e-mail addresses__ subscribed to R-help will be allowed to post to R-help without any moderation, and we are even considering outright rejection all non-subscribers, these latter decision coming later. Consequence: Please subscribe to R-...

On 01/02/2014 04:09 AM, Ferenc Wagner wrote: > > Issuing another make after this gave the previous error again: > > isolinux.asm:1102: error: TIMES value -4 is negative > I just fixed this one... it seems to be a consequence of merging in the MOVZX isolinux fix into the firmware branch. -hpa

...se RFC 2142 strongly recommends it for that purpose. And sometimes one just makes a typo. It has not been too uncommon for people to forget the `-officer' part of `security-officer@freebsd.org'. (Yours truly has been guilty of this.) Mistaken early disclosure of a vulnerability can have consequences from the merely embarrasing to catastrophic. Therefore, I am proposing that `security@freebsd.org' be re-routed to the Security Officer. I imagine this will have some significant impact: there must be many references to security@freebsd.org as a public list out there. So, I thought I'...

All, This morning, I upgraded samba to version 3.5 on CentOS 4.6 and 5.4 boxes. When trying to run any "net" command, I get the following message: net: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/libreadline.so.x: undefined symbol: PC Additionally, while I can see my shares, I can't see any of the data in them. What does the error indicate, and how can I fix it. Thanks. Dimitri --

...onest and simple question: would it make sense to have a different code of conduct for meetings and the rest? I know it sounds like a bad idea, but my rationale is that maybe this would at least solve some of the points that socially inept people feel pressure on the current proposal. Because the consequences of a physical meeting can be a lot tougher than any electronic one, and because timing is of the essence, the wording *has* to be stronger and an executive decision has to be implemented. But such strong wording and harsh unappealable consequences do make us, of the anti-social variety, very...