Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "conscise".
Did you mean:
concise
2012 Jun 18
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: "Building with MinGW on Windows" (DOC, 2ND TRY)
...e suggestions that go
against each other :-)
I'll fix the documentation so that it uses MinGW and MinGW-W64. I'll
ignore that the 64-bit version targets both 32-bit and 64-bit Windows, so
as to keep things simple.
I'll use your link, thank you for that.
It is intended to be a brief, conscise, and precise tutorial on how to
build LLVM and Clang using the MinGW tools. I believe that those who know
more can easily skip parts whereas those who know less cannot easily figure
out the missing parts. So I try to spell it out from A to Z. That way,
anybody can read and use the document: The...
2012 Jun 18
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: "Building with MinGW on Windows" (DOC, 2ND TRY)
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 12:25 PM, Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> 3. The document now covers 32-bit and 64-bit builds with MinGW tools (if
> anybody know of an alternate BINARY distribution of MinGW64 than Drangon's
> release, please let me know so I can include it in the document).
As was once explained to me by Ruben Van Boxem, what you
2012 Jun 18
5
[LLVMdev] RFC: "Building with MinGW on Windows" (DOC, 2ND TRY)
Hi all,
Here's an updated version of my proposed "Building with MinGW on Windows"
document. In summary, the document gives a step-by-step description of how
to build LLVM + Clang on Windows WITHOUT having Microsoft Visual Studio
installed. The high-level goal of the document is to make life pleasant
for those wonderful Windows users who desire to try out LLVM and/or Clang.
I