search for: cons_init

...fset; + + memcpy(buf, inbuf + cons_offset, count); + cons_offset += count; + if (cons_offset == cons_input.used_len) { + cons_offset = 0; + cons_input.used_len = 0; + } + return count; +} + +struct hv_ops lguest_cons = { + .get_chars = get_chars, + .put_chars = put_chars, +}; + +static int __init cons_init(void) +{ + if (strcmp(paravirt_ops.name, "lguest") != 0) + return 0; + + return hvc_instantiate(0, 0, &lguest_cons); +} +console_initcall(cons_init); + +static int lguestcons_probe(struct lguest_device *lgdev) +{ + lgdev->private = hvc_alloc(0, lgdev->index+1, &lguest_cons,...

...fset; + + memcpy(buf, inbuf + cons_offset, count); + cons_offset += count; + if (cons_offset == cons_input.used_len) { + cons_offset = 0; + cons_input.used_len = 0; + } + return count; +} + +struct hv_ops lguest_cons = { + .get_chars = get_chars, + .put_chars = put_chars, +}; + +static int __init cons_init(void) +{ + if (strcmp(paravirt_ops.name, "lguest") != 0) + return 0; + + return hvc_instantiate(0, 0, &lguest_cons); +} +console_initcall(cons_init); + +static int lguestcons_probe(struct lguest_device *lgdev) +{ + lgdev->private = hvc_alloc(0, lgdev->index+1, &lguest_cons,...

...@@ -25,7 +25,6 @@ static int cons_irq; static int cons_offset; static char inbuf[256]; static struct lguest_dma cons_input = { .used_len = 0, - .addr[0] = __pa(inbuf), .len[0] = sizeof(inbuf), .len[1] = 0 }; @@ -66,6 +65,12 @@ struct hv_ops lguest_cons = { static int __init cons_init(void) { + /* + * Can't initialize this in the const declarations, + * since __pa(inbuf) does not evaluate into a constant. + */ + cons_input.addr[0] = __pa(inbuf); + if (strcmp(paravirt_ops.name, "lguest") != 0) return 0; --

...@@ -25,7 +25,6 @@ static int cons_irq; static int cons_offset; static char inbuf[256]; static struct lguest_dma cons_input = { .used_len = 0, - .addr[0] = __pa(inbuf), .len[0] = sizeof(inbuf), .len[1] = 0 }; @@ -66,6 +65,12 @@ struct hv_ops lguest_cons = { static int __init cons_init(void) { + /* + * Can't initialize this in the const declarations, + * since __pa(inbuf) does not evaluate into a constant. + */ + cons_input.addr[0] = __pa(inbuf); + if (strcmp(paravirt_ops.name, "lguest") != 0) return 0; --

Hi all, Gratefully-received recent feedback from CC'd was applied to excellent effect (and the advice from Matt Mackall about my personal appearance is best unrequited). The patch is split in 5 parts to correspond with the 9 parts Andrew sent out before, but here's the summary: 1) Sparse (thanks Christoph Hellwig): - lguest_const can be static now - lguest.c should include

Hi all, Gratefully-received recent feedback from CC'd was applied to excellent effect (and the advice from Matt Mackall about my personal appearance is best unrequited). The patch is split in 5 parts to correspond with the 9 parts Andrew sent out before, but here's the summary: 1) Sparse (thanks Christoph Hellwig): - lguest_const can be static now - lguest.c should include

...pv_info.kernel_rpl = 0; /* set the limit of our address space */ xen_reserve_top(); =================================================================== --- a/drivers/char/hvc_lguest.c +++ b/drivers/char/hvc_lguest.c @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ static struct hv_ops lguest_cons = { static int __init cons_init(void) { - if (strcmp(paravirt_ops.name, "lguest") != 0) + if (strcmp(pv_info.name, "lguest") != 0) return 0; return hvc_instantiate(0, 0, &lguest_cons); =================================================================== --- a/drivers/lguest/core.c +++ b/drivers/lgue...

...pv_info.kernel_rpl = 0; /* set the limit of our address space */ xen_reserve_top(); =================================================================== --- a/drivers/char/hvc_lguest.c +++ b/drivers/char/hvc_lguest.c @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ static struct hv_ops lguest_cons = { static int __init cons_init(void) { - if (strcmp(paravirt_ops.name, "lguest") != 0) + if (strcmp(pv_info.name, "lguest") != 0) return 0; return hvc_instantiate(0, 0, &lguest_cons); =================================================================== --- a/drivers/lguest/core.c +++ b/drivers/lgue...

Hi Linus, Here's a set of patches to update paravirt_ops and Xen for 2.6.24 A quick overview of the patchset: paravirt_ops: Remove the monolithic paravirt_ops structure, and replace it with smaller structures of related functions. Also, clean up the handling of lazy mode to make it easier to implement. x86/mm/init.c: remove a chunk of dead code Xen: - remove duplicate includes -

Hi Linus, Here's a set of patches to update paravirt_ops and Xen for 2.6.24 A quick overview of the patchset: paravirt_ops: Remove the monolithic paravirt_ops structure, and replace it with smaller structures of related functions. Also, clean up the handling of lazy mode to make it easier to implement. x86/mm/init.c: remove a chunk of dead code Xen: - remove duplicate includes -

Hi Linus, Here's a set of patches to update paravirt_ops and Xen for 2.6.24 A quick overview of the patchset: paravirt_ops: Remove the monolithic paravirt_ops structure, and replace it with smaller structures of related functions. Also, clean up the handling of lazy mode to make it easier to implement. x86/mm/init.c: remove a chunk of dead code Xen: - remove duplicate includes -

Hi all, These are the patches I'm planning to submit for 2.6.24. Comments gratefully accepted. Along with the usual cleanups and improvements are Jes' de-i386-ification patches, and a new "virtio" mechanism designed to be shared with KVM (and hopefully other hypervisors). Cheers, Rusty. Documentation/lguest/Makefile | 30 Documentation/lguest/lguest.c

Hi all, These are the patches I'm planning to submit for 2.6.24. Comments gratefully accepted. Along with the usual cleanups and improvements are Jes' de-i386-ification patches, and a new "virtio" mechanism designed to be shared with KVM (and hopefully other hypervisors). Cheers, Rusty. Documentation/lguest/Makefile | 30 Documentation/lguest/lguest.c

Hi all, I've been working on lguest64 and in order to do this, I had to move a lot of the i386 specific out of the way. Well, the lguest64 port is still not ready to display, but before Rusty makes too many changes I would like this in upstream so I don't have to keep repeating my changes :-) So this patch series moves lguest32 out of the way for other archs. -- Steve

Hi all, I've been working on lguest64 and in order to do this, I had to move a lot of the i386 specific out of the way. Well, the lguest64 port is still not ready to display, but before Rusty makes too many changes I would like this in upstream so I don't have to keep repeating my changes :-) So this patch series moves lguest32 out of the way for other archs. -- Steve

[ Changes since last version. - Move lg.h to include/asm instead (suggested by Rusty Russel) - All steps of the series compiles (suggested by Stephen Rothwell) - Better ifdef header naming (suggested by Stephen Rothwell) - Added Andi Kleen to CC (forgot to on V1) ] Hi all, I've been working on lguest64 and in order to do this, I had to move a lot of the i386 specific out of the

[ Changes since last version. - Move lg.h to include/asm instead (suggested by Rusty Russel) - All steps of the series compiles (suggested by Stephen Rothwell) - Better ifdef header naming (suggested by Stephen Rothwell) - Added Andi Kleen to CC (forgot to on V1) ] Hi all, I've been working on lguest64 and in order to do this, I had to move a lot of the i386 specific out of the