Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "conntack".
Did you mean:
conntrack
2003 Feb 25
1
[Bug 54] Kernel crash with pptp connectiontrack
...tch-o-matic
------- Additional Comments From laforge@netfilter.org 2003-02-25 10:03 -------
I don't know what particular patch the Gentoo distribution uses. We are not
aware of kernel crashes with the pptp helper(s).
Can you try a plain linux kernel with patch-o-matic's
'extra/pptp-conntack-nat.patch' and see if you can confirm the problem?
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
2006 Aug 03
28
[Bug 498] RTP packets are not hitting NAT table
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=498
cfilin@intermedia.net changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |chip@innovates.com
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are
2004 May 22
6
MARK causes high CPU usage / using tc in conjunction with MASQ
Using below configuration multiplied by 3000+ nodes to control bandwidth
causes very high kernel cpu usage (99.5%) narrowed it down to the mangle
table. Any ideas to do this more efficiently would be appreciated.
The mangle table entry (indicated by ***) is sucking all the cpu. I am
running RH7.3 kernel 2.4.18-3 and iptables 1.2.5
This setup has worked well for more than 1000 devices but as the