search for: connie

...m/init.c | 11 +++++++++++ drivers/virtio/Kconfig | 6 ++++++ drivers/virtio/virtio.c | 15 +++++++++++++++ include/linux/virtio_config.h | 9 +++++++++ 5 files changed, 42 insertions(+) -- 2.25.1 Changelog to v9: - move virtio tests back to virtio_finalize_features (Connie) - remove virtio device argument to v8: - refactoring by using an optional callback (Connie) to v7: - typo in warning message (Connie) to v6: - rewording warning messages (Connie, Halil) to v5: - return directly from S390 arch_validate_virtio_features() when the guest is not protect...

...atch 4) > > * make the genpool based dma pools API tolerate NULL genpool (patch 2) > > * fix typo (patch 2) > > * fix unintended code move (patch 7) > > * add more r-b's > > > > > > > > v3 --> v4 > > * fixed cleanup in css_bus_init() (Connie) > > * made cio.h include genalloc.h instead of a forward declaration > > (Connie) > > * added comments about dma_mask/coherent_dma_mask values (Connie) > > * fixed error handling in virtio_ccw_init() (Connie) > > * got rid of the *vc_dma* wrappers (Connie) > &gt...

Hi all, The goal of the series is to give a chance to the architecture to validate VIRTIO device features. in this respin: I use the original idea from Connie for an optional arch_has_restricted_memory_access. I renamed the callback accordingly, added the definition of ARCH_HAS_RESTRICTED_MEMORY_ACCESS inside the VIRTIO Kconfig and the selection in the PROTECTED_VIRTUALIZATION_GUEST config entry. Regards, Pierre Pierre Morel (2): virtio: let arch v...

...press inaccurate part of the comment in patch 2 (Halil) - added back virtio_config.h to define arch_has_restricted_virtio_memory_access (kernel robot) to v11: - replaced VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM with VIRTIO_F_ACCESS_PLATFORM to v10: - removed virtio_config.h unnecessary include - wording (Connie) to v9: - move virtio tests back to virtio_finalize_features (Connie) - remove virtio device argument to v8: - refactoring by using an optional callback (Connie) to v7: - typo in warning message (Connie) to v6: - rewording warning messages (Connie, Halil) to v5: - return directly...

...press inaccurate part of the comment in patch 2 (Halil) - added back virtio_config.h to define arch_has_restricted_virtio_memory_access (kernel robot) to v11: - replaced VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM with VIRTIO_F_ACCESS_PLATFORM to v10: - removed virtio_config.h unnecessary include - wording (Connie) to v9: - move virtio tests back to virtio_finalize_features (Connie) - remove virtio device argument to v8: - refactoring by using an optional callback (Connie) to v7: - typo in warning message (Connie) to v6: - rewording warning messages (Connie, Halil) to v5: - return directly...

...rtio: PV needs VIRTIO I/O device protection arch/s390/mm/init.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/virtio/virtio.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ include/linux/virtio_config.h | 1 + 3 files changed, 48 insertions(+) -- 2.25.1 Changelog to v7: - typo in warning message (Connie) to v6: - rewording warning messages (Connie, Halil) to v5: - return directly from S390 arch_validate_virtio_features() when the guest is not protected. (Connie) - Somme rewording (Connie, Michael) - moved back code from arch/s390/ ...kernel/uv.c to ...mm/init.c (Christian) to v4:...

Someone told me that if you have a CentOS or Fedora server, you can pay a Red Hat yearly fee and get them to support it (because the environments are so similar). Can anyone here substantiate this claim? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20091211/03c9856b/attachment.html>

...init.c | 10 ++++++++++ drivers/virtio/Kconfig | 6 ++++++ drivers/virtio/virtio.c | 15 +++++++++++++++ include/linux/virtio_config.h | 9 +++++++++ 5 files changed, 41 insertions(+) -- 2.25.1 Changelog to v10: - removed virtio_config.h unnecessary include - wording (Connie) to v9: - move virtio tests back to virtio_finalize_features (Connie) - remove virtio device argument to v8: - refactoring by using an optional callback (Connie) to v7: - typo in warning message (Connie) to v6: - rewording warning messages (Connie, Halil) to v5: - return directly...

...dma_pool API not tolerating NULL dma pool (patch 4) > * make the genpool based dma pools API tolerate NULL genpool (patch 2) > * fix typo (patch 2) > * fix unintended code move (patch 7) > * add more r-b's > > > > v3 --> v4 > * fixed cleanup in css_bus_init() (Connie) > * made cio.h include genalloc.h instead of a forward declaration > (Connie) > * added comments about dma_mask/coherent_dma_mask values (Connie) > * fixed error handling in virtio_ccw_init() (Connie) > * got rid of the *vc_dma* wrappers (Connie) > * added some Reviewed-bys &g...

...o: PV needs VIRTIO I/O device protection arch/s390/mm/init.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/virtio/virtio.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ include/linux/virtio_config.h | 1 + 3 files changed, 48 insertions(+) -- 2.25.1 Changelog to v6: - rewording warning messages (Connie, Halil) to v5: - return directly from S390 arch_validate_virtio_features() when the guest is not protected. (Connie) - Somme rewording (Connie, Michael) - moved back code from arch/s390/ ...kernel/uv.c to ...mm/init.c (Christian) to v4: - separate virtio and arch code (Pierre) - mo...

...ilable anymore which still >> supports this old virtio transport, so let's disable this by default. >> >> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth at redhat.com> > > I don't have any objections, but there may be something I'm not aware of. > Let's see what Connie says. From my side it's ack. > > Via whom is this supposed to go in? Looking at the MAINTAINERS, I would > say Martin or Heiko but I don't see them among the recipients. FWIW as the original author of that transport Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger at de.ibm.com&gt...

...ilable anymore which still >> supports this old virtio transport, so let's disable this by default. >> >> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth at redhat.com> > > I don't have any objections, but there may be something I'm not aware of. > Let's see what Connie says. From my side it's ack. > > Via whom is this supposed to go in? Looking at the MAINTAINERS, I would > say Martin or Heiko but I don't see them among the recipients. FWIW as the original author of that transport Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger at de.ibm.com&gt...

...ports this old virtio transport, so let's disable this by default. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth at redhat.com> >>> >>> I don't have any objections, but there may be something I'm not aware of. >>> Let's see what Connie says. From my side it's ack. >>> >>> Via whom is this supposed to go in? Looking at the MAINTAINERS, I would >>> say Martin or Heiko but I don't see them among the recipients. >> >> FWIW as the original author of that transport >> Acked-by: Chris...

...ports this old virtio transport, so let's disable this by default. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth at redhat.com> >>> >>> I don't have any objections, but there may be something I'm not aware of. >>> Let's see what Connie says. From my side it's ack. >>> >>> Via whom is this supposed to go in? Looking at the MAINTAINERS, I would >>> say Martin or Heiko but I don't see them among the recipients. >> >> FWIW as the original author of that transport >> Acked-by: Chris...

...drivers/virtio/virtio.c | 15 +++++++++++++++ include/linux/virtio_config.h | 10 ++++++++++ 5 files changed, 42 insertions(+) -- 2.17.1 Changelog to v11: - replaced VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM with VIRTIO_F_ACCESS_PLATFORM to v10: - removed virtio_config.h unnecessary include - wording (Connie) to v9: - move virtio tests back to virtio_finalize_features (Connie) - remove virtio device argument to v8: - refactoring by using an optional callback (Connie) to v7: - typo in warning message (Connie) to v6: - rewording warning messages (Connie, Halil) to v5: - return directly...

...drivers/virtio/virtio.c | 15 +++++++++++++++ include/linux/virtio_config.h | 10 ++++++++++ 5 files changed, 42 insertions(+) -- 2.17.1 Changelog to v11: - replaced VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM with VIRTIO_F_ACCESS_PLATFORM to v10: - removed virtio_config.h unnecessary include - wording (Connie) to v9: - move virtio tests back to virtio_finalize_features (Connie) - remove virtio device argument to v8: - refactoring by using an optional callback (Connie) to v7: - typo in warning message (Connie) to v6: - rewording warning messages (Connie, Halil) to v5: - return directly...

...| 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/virtio/virtio.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ include/linux/virtio_config.h | 1 + 3 files changed, 47 insertions(+) -- 2.25.1 Changelog to v5: - return directly from S390 arch_validate_virtio_features() when the guest is not protected. (Connie) - Somme rewording (Connie, Michael) - moved back code from arch/s390/ ...kernel/uv.c to ...mm/init.c (Christian) to v4: - separate virtio and arch code (Pierre) - moved code from arch/s390/mm/init.c to arch/s390/kernel/uv.c (as interpreted from Heiko's comment) - moved validation...

Hello list, my name is Steven and of course: I got a problem... we are using dovecot 0.99 because it?s the actual stable version for RedHat 4 Enterprise. I am trying to authenticate using "PLAIN" but I don?t know how. that?s what I am doing: telnet conny.MYDOMAIN.de 143 Trying IP.AD.RE.SS... Connected to conny.MYDOMAIN.de. Escape character is '^]'. * OK dovecot ready. a1

FYI, I see the following build error with this patch... MRJ ---- new warnings/errors for xen ---- keyhandler.c: In function `__dump_execstate'': keyhandler.c:96: warning: asm operand 1 probably doesn''t match constraints gmake[5]: *** [keyhandler.o] Error 1 gmake[4]: *** [/tank/ws/xvm-3.4.3/xen.hg/xen/common/built_in.o] Error 2 gmake[3]: *** [/tank/ws/xvm-3.4.3/xen.hg/xen/xen]

....c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ include/linux/virtio_config.h | 1 + 3 files changed, 45 insertions(+) -- 2.25.1 Changelog to v4: - separate virtio and arch code (Pierre) - moved code from arch/s390/mm/init.c to arch/s390/kernel/uv.c (Heiko) - moved validation inside the arch code (Connie) - moved the call to arch validation before VIRTIO_F_1 test (Michael) to v3: - add warning (Connie, Christian) - add comment (Connie) - change hook name (Halil, Connie) to v2: - put the test in virtio_finalize_features() (Connie) - put the test inside VIRTIO core (Jason) - pass...